Doctor Who: Episode 12: The Pandorica Opens (Spoilers)
- Thread starter TimeLord
- Start date
He didn't actually have it with him, he had it sent away so it could be taken off the wrist of the previous owner before finding out.shemming said:
[HEADING=3]"Total event collapse. Ever sun will supernova at every moment in history..."[/HEADING]
Except Sol
Except Sol
Paddin said:Yes a normal episode where he featured would be nice.PoliceBox63 said:Jack is Moffat's character seeming he was introduced under a script of his, and so I think a cameo will probably happen. But I'd rather it happened independent of big events such as the finale, so he actually gets a chance to shine. Also, I'm just not that big a fan of Jack because, well, what more is there to see of Jack? I can't see a story they'd do with him that was that original.Paddin said:Jack is special thoughPaddin said:
Jesus, that previous page is the Page of Jack. Theres pictures of him everywhere!
Lol the Page of Jack
To be honest guys and gals, I saw all of that episode coming. Within the first ten minutes I'd outlined all the major plot points that turned up over the next forty (except the android romans), and wasn't proved wrong.
I hope they come up with something less obvious for the conclusion, because I was expecting a belter of a final episode, and so far it's kinda pedestrian.
I hope they come up with something less obvious for the conclusion, because I was expecting a belter of a final episode, and so far it's kinda pedestrian.
Said big blue alien isnt bound by crappy 'thou shalt not meddle in time' laws/doesn't know about them. The vortex manipulater doesnt travel through time tho as river used it to travel through time ergo he/she/it/alien could have used it to travel time and stop himself drinking the bombsPoliceBox63 said:
He is bound by the laws, remember when Rose stopped her dad dying? Even though it was Rose doing it, time was still being fixed by those creatures. Everything is bound by the laws of time, and its the Time Lords that are supposed to fix paradoxes.shemming said:Said big blue alien isnt bound by crappy 'thou shalt not meddle in time' laws/doesn't know about them. The vortex manipulater doesnt travel through time tho as river used it to travel through time ergo he/she/it/alien could have used it to travel time and stop himself drinking the bombsPoliceBox63 said:
Also, whos to say, assuming he'd know how to operate one, by the time he had fetched the vortex manipulator, typed in the time and date and activated it, River wouldn't have simply blown him sky high?
They're not
they are actual boundaries they're not like "oh don't go over 50mph" they're laws like the laws of phyisics are lawsshemming said:
I would add this one...TimeLord said:
"What type of starships?"
"......PREPARE TO DESCEND FROM OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRBBBIIITTTTTT"
"DOCTOOOOOR...... Those are Daleks!"
[HEADING=3]"This is the Royal Collection. And I'm the bloody Queen."[/HEADING]
Alright like get over yourself.
Alright like get over yourself.
Wow, criticising Steven Moffat earns you hate, must remember that for future posting.
And saying Timey Wimey Ball (I really have no patience to go back and quote) has about as much significance as saying 'A Wizard Did It'. In other words none.
Next point, saying it's a children's show is demeaning to children, and to the general idea of children's stories. Beauty and the Beast was a children's movie (the Disney one), the original Star Wars were children's movies, the entire concept of videogaming is constantly trying to show people how mature it is. To say that just because something is a childrne's show means it doesn't need to worry about consistency and goofd writing is akin to saying that all children are automatically idiots and we should have no respect for them.
To put it bluntly for however called me long winded and pedantic (or boring and intelligent for your lexicon, I'm sure) I reject your premises, and you should all hold yourself to higher standards.
And saying Timey Wimey Ball (I really have no patience to go back and quote) has about as much significance as saying 'A Wizard Did It'. In other words none.
Next point, saying it's a children's show is demeaning to children, and to the general idea of children's stories. Beauty and the Beast was a children's movie (the Disney one), the original Star Wars were children's movies, the entire concept of videogaming is constantly trying to show people how mature it is. To say that just because something is a childrne's show means it doesn't need to worry about consistency and goofd writing is akin to saying that all children are automatically idiots and we should have no respect for them.
To put it bluntly for however called me long winded and pedantic (or boring and intelligent for your lexicon, I'm sure) I reject your premises, and you should all hold yourself to higher standards.
I had such a moment of fame-by association when the Ermine Street Guard (the Romans, but only when they were outdoors as far as I can tell) turned up - my Dad used to be in that century!
Did it sound to anyone else as if Amy's not actually real? Like, she doesn't exist? Also, can't help but wonder if we're heading towards another situation with a consolation prize for the companion, like with the human version of the Tenth Doctor and Rose, only with Amy and the weird robot-Rory.
Did it sound to anyone else as if Amy's not actually real? Like, she doesn't exist? Also, can't help but wonder if we're heading towards another situation with a consolation prize for the companion, like with the human version of the Tenth Doctor and Rose, only with Amy and the weird robot-Rory.
