And when American shows like Stargte Universe are getting 900,000 or less a week in America, I would say 6.5m in a smaller country is a success.Plinglebob said:I'm sorry, but I don't think 10% of a countries population watching a program (and 37% of the total viewing public as Forsinain shows) makes the figures "A little bleak". Considering in most countries it would be counted as a Niche program (Sci-Fi Action Comedy) I think the figures are fantastic.Logan Westbrook said:While the figures seem a little bleak,
Also, as you pointed out in the article, few families (the target audience) are going to be in during a 4 day weekend when is 25c and Sunny.
That's been a broken point for a while now. He did it in series 5 too. But then again the ONLY time it has been mentioned was in Fathers Day, and the only reason it's a plot point is because creating a paradox gave the Reapers strength and allowed them into the church.k-ossuburb said:Gah, that Christmas special annoyed me. Not for the shark, I was okay with that, it was the fact that the guy comes in physical contact his past-self which we were already informed that YOU SHOULD NEVER DO THAT.
Captcha: Retype above.
What the hell?
Moffat actually said that the Silence are based off the Scream painting.Mad1Cow said:I missed the beginning of it because of traffic, however I was still disappointed. It's like they tried to throw every plot twist they could in the first episode. And not matter what you say, those aliens were based off of the slenderman, yet the writer claims it was his own original monster. I think the cherry on the cake was "I'm pregnant", let's not lie, that's for your soap operas your mum watches...in fact I was surpised this wasn't playing at the end
It may not be "major," but it isn't inconsequential. In 2008 the BNP polled an average of 14% across 593 wards contested having fielded 612 candidates. The total number of votes polled by the BNP stood at 240,968. The party gained 15 seats and had 55 councillors in all local authorities. (Source: wiki)Abandon4093 said:LOLJDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
You think the BNP is a major political party.
Actually, no. The Republican Party isn't called "The Party of [Abraham] Lincoln" for nothing. It wasn't until the 1950s that the Southern Dixiecrats defected from the Democrat Party and joined the Republicans over the issues of desegregation and civil rights.stinkychops said:Republicans?JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
Honestly, republicans are founded on Xenophobia. Racism seems to be more of a minor thing.
I wouldn't be keen to have my country associated with that lot but the fact remains that someone over there likes them enough to vote for them in significant numbers. In 2008 the BNP polled an average of 14% across 593 wards contested having fielded 612 candidates. The total number of votes polled by the BNP stood at 240,968. The party gained 15 seats and had 55 councillors in all local authorities. (Source: wiki)Megacherv said:They are nowhere near being a major national party. Please don't associate Brits with BNP, associate racists with the BNP.JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
The Tea Party candidates may have run as Republicans and the ones elected may now caucus with the Republicans (although I suspect that there are many Republicans that wished they wouldn't), but to say that the Tea Party is a part of the Republican Party may be to misstate the case. They themselves claim to have many registered Democrats among their ranks.Da_Vane said:Just wanted to correct this: Yes, the British National Party are a racist and xenophobic party, but they are not a major political party yet. They have yet to claim a single seat in the House of Commons, and while they may have aspirations in this regard, much of the populace consider them abhorrent because of their racism and xenophobia - as well as other aspects of discrimination. They exist because we allow for a multi-party system and any number of candidates on any number of platforms, under the principles of free speech and free assembly.JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.
Compare this to the Tea Party, who are part of the Republicans/GOP that is a major national party in the US Senate. Whether any Tea Party-ers are actually in the Senate, is a matter for debate, but strong racist, nationalist, principles are more present in the US political system than the UK political system. Whether these principles are representative of the population as a whole, however, is also a matter for debate.
What were you watching that featured Will and Kate? The weddings on Friday...seniorsharptothetouch said:The WEATHER is the reason?
Ya! If the sudden storm of Will & Kate watchers counts!
The same thing happened with Heroes... The last season took place during the election of the century!
Which would YOU rather watch? A TV show or HISTORY in the making?
Besides I'm still waiting for the EXTRA SPECIAL "alternate timeline" episode...
here's a hint
Quoted for truth.forsinain42 said:6pm.
It was on at 6pm.
Doctor Who shouldn't be used by the BBC to prop up it's shit Saturday night lineup. It should be the centre, the gleaming jewel of the BBC.
Here are the 15 minute breakdowns.
17:30 ?.. 1.6 (13.0%)
17:45 ?.. 2.2 (16.4%)
18:00 ?.. 6.0 (35.3%)
18:15 ?.. 6.6 (37.1%)
18:30 ?.. 7.0 (37.5%)
18:45 ?.. 3.2 (18.5%)
19:00 ?.. 3.4 (19.4%)
See that jump? That's Doctor Who.
Now the 5 minutes...
17:55..3.91m
18:00..5.73m
18:05..5.98m
18:10..6.27m
18:15..6.43m
18:20..6.55m
18:25..6.79m
18:30..6.90m
18:35..6.96m
18:40..7.10m
18:45..3.88m
Note 2 things. One is that a 15 minute delay could have nabbed about 0.7 million more views and second note the drop off. People aren't just watching Who because its on. They are watching it because its Who!
Now what did the 11th Hour get on it's first night?
8.0m ..... (38.4%)
See that? About a single % less. It just shows that so many fewer people were watching TV. 1.5 million people didn't abandon Who, they abandoned ALL TV!
Not only that but it was the highest rated non-soap/reality show on during the whole week!
It did well. Ignore the media.
well it IS a British show >.>DanDanikov said:Also, I'm a bit disappointed that Britain (population: circa 62 million) can drum up 7 million live viewers on a nice day, while the USA (population 307 million, in 2009 anyway, 5 times as much) only managed 3.5 million. Doctor Who is 10 times more popular over here?
The Parliament isn't the only representative body. If you think it is you are a Grade "A" moron. The BNP are apparently able to do rather well at the local level. A quarter million votes and 14% of the votes cast ain't peanuts. What percentage of the vote did Cameron and the Conservatives get last time out?Abandon4093 said:Oh yea, they sure aren't inconsequential. Them having NO seats in parliament is by no means a downer on that theory.JDKJ said:It may not be "major," but it isn't inconsequential. In 2008 the BNP polled an average of 14% across 593 wards contested having fielded 612 candidates. The total number of votes polled by the BNP stood at 240,968. The party gained 15 seats and had 55 councillors in all local authorities. (Source: wiki)Abandon4093 said:LOLJDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
You think the BNP is a major political party.
They're a fringe party. The only reason they exist is because the UK has a multi-party system. Anyone can create a political party and anyone can vote on them. The UK obviously has Racists and Xenophobes, as does your country. If you think otherwise you're a grade A moron.
You may aswell say that the 'Pirate Party' is a major British political party.
What you're looking at is the downside of freedom of speech mixed with a multi-party system. Any idiot is free to say what they like. And even more idiots are free to agree with them.
I thought they called themselves the GOP... either way American politics worries me, in England, we see that cameron is being a twat and it his actions benefit only the upper class and call him out on it (fruitlessly I know, I have already mentioned the fact that he is a twat), whereas in the states, you have a leader who talks big and gets votes, then basically gives the republicans exactly what they want, then is called out by conservative media for not being right wing enough, then when the effects of conservative priorities cause a load of jobs to be lost they then blame the same guy who gave them what he wants, yet he and the American people still seem to think that the republicans are the good honest guys... even when they directly oppose something that the people are crying out for, they say "well the people want the [exact opposite of what they are saying] and by sticking with our priorities you will get them.JDKJ said:Actually, no. The Republican Party isn't called "The Party of [Abraham] Lincoln" for nothing.stinkychops said:Republicans?JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
Honestly, republicans are founded on Xenophobia. Racism seems to be more of a minor thing.
They're still not a major political party, and should never be associated with all British citizensJDKJ said:I wouldn't be keen to have my country associated with that lot but the fact remains that someone over there likes them enough to vote for them in significant numbers. In 2008 the BNP polled an average of 14% across 593 wards contested having fielded 612 candidates. The total number of votes polled by the BNP stood at 240,968. The party gained 15 seats and had 55 councillors in all local authorities. (Source: wiki)Megacherv said:They are nowhere near being a major national party. Please don't associate Brits with BNP, associate racists with the BNP.JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
Did you miss the part where I said that there was a major shift in the Republican Party's constituency in the 1950s?stinkychops said:Yes, because the Republican party clearly hasn't changed in the time between Abraham Lincoln and now.JDKJ said:Actually, no. The Republican Party isn't called "The Party of [Abraham] Lincoln" for nothing. It wasn't until the 1950s that the Southern Dixiecrats defected from the Democrat Party and joined the Republicans over the issues of desegregation and civil rights.stinkychops said:Republicans?JDKJ said:More extremist than the Brits and the BNP? Doesn't the "N" in "BNP" stand for "nationalist?" At least the Yanks don't have a major political party proudly founded on the principles of racism and xenophobia.Daverson said:£500 says the reason it was rated so high in the US was because it was based in the US. Yanks take nationa... erm... "patriotism" to new extremes =p
Honestly, republicans are founded on Xenophobia. Racism seems to be more of a minor thing.
Honestly.