Doctor Who Review: This Is The Show At Its Best

Dan O'Halloran

New member
Feb 4, 2014
61
0
0
Doctor Who Review: This Is The Show At Its Best

Sharp writing, superb acting and surprising character revelations make this tightly-paced episode one of the best in a very long time.

Read Full Article
 

Wolyo

New member
Sep 27, 2013
51
0
0
gigastar said:
See? Moffat can still write gold when he tries.
Moffat is very good when he go for a self-contained story, it's when he tries to do something over the whole season that things gets bad.
 

Gizmo1990

Insert funny title here
Oct 19, 2010
1,900
0
0
As I said in another thread, I think that that the overall story was a great idea but it focused far to much on Clara. I have no interest in her love life. I in fact have very little intrest in her at all. I watch Doctor Who to watch the Doctor do crazy stuff not watch the human strays he picks up do important things and be more important than him.
 

man-man

New member
Jan 21, 2008
163
0
0
if he keeps this up he'll never get into the army or become a Time Lord.
One small point, I'm pretty sure that was "academy", not "army".

Given the Doctor's frequently expressed distaste for soldiers, that seems like a semi-important distinction.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
This was a very well written, very compelling episode. However like Gizmo1990 I am not really interested in Clara's love life. As I said in the other thread, it is nice to see Clara getting some character development, however I do think they're running the risk of having her upstage and overshadow the Doctor. I don't know about anyone else, but I watch Doctor Who to watch the Doctor be awesome and save people and planets and do other amazing things.
gigastar said:
See? Moffat can still write gold when he tries.
Maffat is certainly a capable writer when it comes to single self-contained episodes. He is just not very good at introducing over-arching plot points and then paying them off.
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,137
0
0
I find the break in Lore particularly jarring. Galifrey is removed from this universe, either by time lock or by being excluded in a bubble universe. The final sequence shouldn't happen. Good story otherwise.

Also, Army or Time Lord one or the other, the man says The Doctor will be in the Army because he doesn't have what it takes to get into the Academy and become a Time Lord. All Time Lords are Gallifrean, but not all Gallifrean's are Time Lords.
 

andersgeek

New member
Jul 6, 2010
126
0
0
I don't know whether it's Capaldi, who I still don't like that much, or that I'm so fed up with Moffat-era Who by now that I just don't see [or want to acknowledge] the brilliance in this episode everyone else does. It certainly has to do with the fact that the "Clara is the monster under the bed" plot-point would've been a waaaaaay better pay-off for the "Impossible Girl" arc last season. It is kind of neat, but it annoys me quite a bit that it took them this long. Probably irrationally so.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
I'm still unsure about one thing in the episode. What was on Rupert's bed? We only saw a hair of it, but it definitely wasn't human.
 

VincentX3

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,299
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
I'm still unsure about one thing in the episode. What was on Rupert's bed? We only saw a hair of it, but it definitely wasn't human.
This ^

This whole episode felt contradictory after I remembered this and saw the ending.
The whole episode "trys" to tell you that in the end there was truly nothing in the dark.

Yet that one scene when the "monster" uncovers itself for a moment shows there IS something always lurking.
So yea.. confused on how to feel at the moment
 

gridsleep

New member
Sep 27, 2008
299
0
0
Netflix only has selected arcs of the earlier series, not every episode of all twenty-six seasons. Maybe they don't have enough servers.

It is Gallifrey from the moment of the end of the Time War that is time-locked. Gallifrey from when the Doctor was a child is still there in the past. As it was when the War Doctor returned there, along with Ten(nant/"inch") and Eleven, with the Moment just before end of the war. There is no contradiction.

As for what was on the bed, and what pulled off the bedspread out of focus looking a bit like an anthropomorphic horned lizard, we may never know. Just as we may never see the return of Eleven's nemesis the Dream Lord from "Amy's Choice" although they seemed to indicate foreshadowing galore, nor the Doctor's Daughter, even though she is flying through the cosmos on adventures of her own even as we cogitate. Then again, who knows what lies in the mind of Moffet?

Oo, wouldn't it be splendid if Jenny shows up to take over Companion detail when Clara eventually bows out? It'll be just like One and Susan again. That would be nice. She'd call him "Dad" all the time, much to his dismay.
 

small

New member
Aug 5, 2014
469
0
0
VincentX3 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
I'm still unsure about one thing in the episode. What was on Rupert's bed? We only saw a hair of it, but it definitely wasn't human.
This ^

This whole episode felt contradictory after I remembered this and saw the ending.
The whole episode "trys" to tell you that in the end there was truly nothing in the dark.

Yet that one scene when the "monster" uncovers itself for a moment shows there IS something always lurking.
So yea.. confused on how to feel at the moment
i know the feeling.
starts off great and then that whole thing is ignored and dismissed at the end where it lost me. i can see what he was aiming for but it needed another scene or something. them getting into the tardis, leaving and something in the shadows watching
 

Jeroenr

New member
Nov 20, 2013
255
0
0
octafish said:
I find the break in Lore particularly jarring. Galifrey is removed from this universe, either by time lock or by being excluded in a bubble universe. The final sequence shouldn't happen. Good story otherwise.

Also, Army or Time Lord one or the other, the man says The Doctor will be in the Army because he doesn't have what it takes to get into the Academy and become a Time Lord. All Time Lords are Gallifrean, but not all Gallifrean's are Time Lords.
The time lock was often described as the TARDIS simply refusing to take the doctor somewhere.
Like in what the TARDIS did in "Time of the Doctor" by refusing to go to trenzalore.
In this case the TARDIS didn't take the doctor, it took Clara.

gridsleep said:
Netflix only has selected arcs of the earlier series, not every episode of all twenty-six seasons. Maybe they don't have enough servers.

It is Gallifrey from the moment of the end of the Time War that is time-locked. Gallifrey from when the Doctor was a child is still there in the past. As it was when the War Doctor returned there, along with Ten(nant/"inch") and Eleven, with the Moment just before end of the war. There is no contradiction.

As for what was on the bed, and what pulled off the bedspread out of focus looking a bit like an anthropomorphic horned lizard, we may never know. Just as we may never see the return of Eleven's nemesis the Dream Lord from "Amy's Choice" although they seemed to indicate foreshadowing galore, nor the Doctor's Daughter, even though she is flying through the cosmos on adventures of her own even as we cogitate. Then again, who knows what lies in the mind of Moffet?

Oo, wouldn't it be splendid if Jenny shows up to take over Companion detail when Clara eventually bows out? It'll be just like One and Susan again. That would be nice. She'd call him "Dad" all the time, much to his dismay.
Although Jenny returning would be cool.
I feel she and the doctor are to alike, she can't really balance the doctor out.

The female soldier from the dalek episode is the most likely candidate.
The Doctor blew her off for being a soldier, but she didn't seem to keen on being one either.


On the episode:

I loved the subtle connections, like Orson Pink.

Also, when the talking couple mention "Time Lord" really gave me a big "Wait.... WHAT.." reaction (Also did to Clara).
 

Kingjackl

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,041
0
0
I like it when Steven Moffat does a spooky episode, since his goal seems to be to make even the most innocuous things scary. We've done things that move when you're not looking (Weeping Angels), the dark (Vashta Nerada), gaps in your memory (the Silence), and now the monster under the bed. I'm almost certain he came up for the idea when he was reminded of the old 'kids hide under the sofa when Doctor Who comes on' meme and gleefully decided to make underneath the sofa scary.
 

bunnielovekins

New member
Mar 1, 2013
39
0
0
Wasn't a fan. It started off very well as a horror episode, then decided not to be and turned into a clara episode. If they'd run with the horror it would have been awesome, that's the reason blink was so good, but in the end I was disappointed. That the thing under rupert's sheet and the things outside orson's door were supposedly red herrings is just not great at all.
 

VincentX3

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,299
0
0
small said:
VincentX3 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
I'm still unsure about one thing in the episode. What was on Rupert's bed? We only saw a hair of it, but it definitely wasn't human.
This ^

This whole episode felt contradictory after I remembered this and saw the ending.
The whole episode "trys" to tell you that in the end there was truly nothing in the dark.

Yet that one scene when the "monster" uncovers itself for a moment shows there IS something always lurking.
So yea.. confused on how to feel at the moment
i know the feeling.
starts off great and then that whole thing is ignored and dismissed at the end where it lost me. i can see what he was aiming for but it needed another scene or something. them getting into the tardis, leaving and something in the shadows watching
Plus theres the whole "who wrote Listen in the chalkboard?" since it showed the chalkboard being full of writing that the Doctor actually DID write in the beggining, yet poof! chalk falls down and "LISTEN" is written.

This episode was just all over the place.
 

Punkster

New member
Sep 9, 2014
15
0
0
Well I enjoyed it too, I thought it was refreshing to see a Mofatt script that didn't keep hammering in, with it's own self importance with more smug gitty writing to roll my eyes at.

I'm an old fan of Steven's writing, but in recent years his ideas have been all over the place I believe mainly because nobody is in charge of his scripts and he needs somebody to reign him in from time to time.

This episode had me worried for the 1st twenty minutes, while I kept thinking to myself, what is this all about? As it appeared as if there was no story at all to get invested in and I thought it bland, but I kept telling myself it's Steven Mofatt, one thing he does not do is bland. So I kept on watching.

It eventually paid off and I think as an overall story it worked... Eventually.

I'd give it a solid 8/10.
 

Wolf In A Bear Suit

New member
Jun 2, 2012
519
0
0
The monster under blanket scene was one of the most enjoyable moments of this series while I was watching it. It was akin to the horror episodes like the Angels, Vashta Nerada etc that I love. What let it down was that they gave no real explination for this and Moffat showed he can't link his ideas together properly at all. He can write really compelling stuff but it's so hot and cold that you never know if you're going to get a love and nonsense episode in which the old reliable themes are boringly trotted out or a compelling sci-fi script mixed with mood lifting moments of comedy and character development.
This episode was a bit of both for me.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
VincentX3 said:
small said:
VincentX3 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
I'm still unsure about one thing in the episode. What was on Rupert's bed? We only saw a hair of it, but it definitely wasn't human.
This ^

This whole episode felt contradictory after I remembered this and saw the ending.
The whole episode "trys" to tell you that in the end there was truly nothing in the dark.

Yet that one scene when the "monster" uncovers itself for a moment shows there IS something always lurking.
So yea.. confused on how to feel at the moment
i know the feeling.
starts off great and then that whole thing is ignored and dismissed at the end where it lost me. i can see what he was aiming for but it needed another scene or something. them getting into the tardis, leaving and something in the shadows watching
Plus theres the whole "who wrote Listen in the chalkboard?" since it showed the chalkboard being full of writing that the Doctor actually DID write in the beggining, yet poof! chalk falls down and "LISTEN" is written.

This episode was just all over the place.
Well, that's because the answer to this is "we don't know." Unlike the other Moffat "monster" stories, this one is left purposefully ambiguous. Was it a monster or just another kid? Was Capaldi subconsciously doing the unexplained and we cannot take what we see when it is only him on the screen? Was there someone behind the door or just knocking? It's purposefully left up in the air whether a monster exists or not. And in this case, I think it works. It doesn't try to say "it was nothing". It more tries to say "we don't know."