Doctor Who's "Kill the Moon" Is a Mess of Pseudoscience

PrimePowerOn

New member
Nov 30, 2009
45
0
0
Adraeus said:
Doctor Who's "Kill the Moon" Is a Mess of Pseudoscience [...] Unfortunately, the action is often spoiled by the science, which even by Doctor Who standards is pretty slip-shod. [...] This is basically Doctor Who's version of Armageddon except Armageddon was probably more scientifically sound.
You're looking for hard sci-fi in the wrong TV series about aliens who travel through space and time in police boxes.
I don't think these criticisms necessarily indicate a desire for 'Who to be hard Sci Fi. It would be nice if the show was just consistent with standard physics, or at least give us a hand wave "reverse the polarity" kind of explanation.

Two examples: The moon spiders are "single-cell prokaryotic organsms"? Seriously? I may be more irked by this than other folks, having some biology training, but it's a friggen spider with fangs and legs. That speaks to cell differentiation, which makes it impossible to be a single-celled organism. Weird writing.

Additionally, where is the moon's extra mass coming from, and why does it gain so quickly? Apparently the Mexican mining team shows up, and THEN the trouble starts. What did they do to encourage this being to change mass so rapidly? If this thing is really millions of years old, shouldn't it be increasing mass at a slow and steady rate?

Also, where is this mass coming from? A baby animal gets larger and heavier because its mother is eating throughout development. I would have liked to have seen some sort of hand wave here, explaining it was sucking up energy / turning it into mass (which could explain why it took so long to grow,) or pulling matter in from another dimension, etc. Something to explain this situation at all.

Aside: Shuttle airlocks don't work like that. No one would ever design a door that led directly to the cabin. You'd have to drain that whole room of atmosphere every time you wanted to leave the ship. That's why airlocks are typically small and have two doors.

It really seems like rushed writing, or production issues, or some other problem.
 

luvd1

New member
Jan 25, 2010
736
0
0
... What's wrong with having a train in space? They're had racing galleons through space before and how is it more stupid than space titanic?
 

someonehairy-ish

New member
Mar 15, 2009
1,949
0
0
I already gave my opinion on the episode in another thread, so I'll just copy it here : -

I didn't enjoy it, partly because I find it creepy that Dr Who did an abortion metaphor episode, and because I find it even more creepy that in the end it was pro life holy shit guys, and partly because the science was so goddamn bad.

I noticed about ten obvious bits of weird science but there were undoubtedly more than that:
Firstly, just because you scale up an animal does not mean you scale up the bacteria living on it. Elephant bacteria and mouse bacteria are still bacteria-sized, why would a giant space creature have giant bacteria?

Secondly, how were the 'single celled' life forms displaying bilateral symmetry with structures that usually only arise from cell differentiation? Are we supposed to believe that a creature with 8 legs, specialised mouth parts and freaking web glands is single celled? Also, how could a single celled life form maintain structure at that kid of size, in earthlike gravity? It would just collapse.

Thirdly, how would the crumbling moon just 'dissipate', at best it would form a dust ring around the planet or slowly drift away into space, at worst it would all fall to Earth, potentially causing enormous damage. Even if its just a thin layer around the moon, its still a thin layer the size of the freaking MOON, so it would still add plenty of energy to the Earth's atmosphere if it fell and potentially have catastrophic effects. It wouldn't all just disappear like a fart in a spacious room.

Fourthly, how can the creature have been sitting there and growing for millions of years, yet the moon only increased rapidly in mass at some point between the present day and the year 2050ish?

Fifthly, how the fuck does a newly hatched creature immediately lay an egg, and how the fuck does it lay an egg almost the size of itself? Holy shit again, do these people actually know the mechanics of egg-laying or childbirth? Your alien laid an egg so big that it has to have a moon sized vagina, but it's only moon sized itself. What the fuck?

Sixthly, how exactly was the creature taking in the energy to grow to that kind of size? Was the energy already stored up in the egg in some kind of yolk? Was the egg somehow absorbing energy from the sun, perhaps? Either one is problematic for reasons I can't be bothered to explain.

Seventhly(?), how do the gravity fluctuations occur, the ones that we see when the girl gets trapped with the alien thing? Gravity is a product of mass, is the creature somehow rapidly changing its mass? How?

Eighthly(?!), they say that the extra mass is causing 'high tide all over the planet at once' or something like that. If the moon increased in mass, you'd still have high tide in the same places at the same times, more or less, the tide would just come in further.

Ninthly(!!!), if the moon is rapidly increasing in mass, why is there not a massive increase in eccentricity of its orbit (ie how elliptical its orbit is)

Finally, the Doctor said that it's 'unique, the only one of its kind' (referring to the moon thing), which implies that either the rest of its kind died out, or it somehow magically bypassed the evolutionary process and just appeared as a unique animal. If it's the first option, how could he possibly know, if it's not, then what the fuck Doctor? Are you mental?

Also, why were there so many extraneous characters in this episode? All you needed were Clara, the Doctor and an astronaut. In fact, you could even have gotten rid of the astronaut and still had the same moral dilemma, and the same trick with the lights, at the end. The kid was annoying, why do you keep doing kid episodes? Gah.

Anyway, my thoughts on the whole creepy abortion thing going on -

Someone on the other thread said:
I don't think that it was pro life, the episode was strongly pro-choice. The Doctor saying that it was up to humanity to choose, and not him as an outsider. The fact that he left three women to make the decision. The fact that it was a very hard decision to make. Just because choosing life ended up being the "correct" decision does not make it pro-life. Pro-choice does not mean "have an abortion already, jeez".
No, it means 'you aren't a bad person if you do choose to have an abortion.' Which is not how the show came across at all. The set up was either we kill an innocent thing or it kills us, which in human terms might be a mother with eclampsia deciding whether to risk her life and continue with the pregnancy or not. That's fine as a dilemma to present, even if it is a bit heavy for Dr Who...
But then when they choose the 'correct' option, as you put it, all the life-threatening consequences just magically disappear in a poof of smoke! It completely undermines any choice whatsoever, because there was only ever one right option. What kind of message does that send? There are no legitimate issues to abort; it might seem like there are but it'll all be fine in the end? Great.

The fact that the Doctor left them to make the decision without all the relevant information only makes it worse. How does helping people make an informed decision take away their ability to choose for themselves? That's a completely fucking insane idea.
 

Tono Makt

New member
Mar 24, 2012
537
0
0
It's a bit heartening to see I'm not the only one who was outright annoyed with this episode. I want to like this new series, and I am going to watch the entire season. (I'm that kind of guy; I watched the entire Evangelion series on VHS back in the early 2000's just so I could scream at a friend of mine who considers it to be the greatest Anime ever made - and so when I screamed at him I could cite things in every episode to back up my hatred for that show.) So far I do like the concept of a darker, older and more remote Doctor, one who is more apt to let a stranger die to serve a "greater good" (as the Doctor defines it at that time) than to move Time and Space to save them. But the execution is just horrible from top to bottom. In my eyes nothing is working this season. The writing is atrocious, the plots are thin and weak and the science is a D minus even when judged on the historical standards for Doctor Who.

I hope it gets better. I want it to get better. I think it can get better - and I think that Samuel Anderson (Danny Pink) might be the actor for the job. His chemistry with Peter Capaldi is intriguing, his character is perhaps the most interesting recurring one to be created in the past few seasons and as an actor, Anderson seems to have chemistry with everyone he's in a scene with. The writing for him is... inconsistent at best, but he's been the recipient for what I think is the most intriguing concept the new series has had so far - the concept of the Doctor being a Military General/Officer. We've been given hints of the Doctor being an Aristocrat in the reboot (and I believe it was pretty much an open idea for some of the pre-reboot Doctors), but the idea of him being a military officer (even metaphorically) is something that Doctor Who has always seemed to shy away from. I'd like to see them dive into that idea with Danny Pink.

And for sake, get rid of Clara. She was an awesome character when she was the Impossible Girl, showing up as almost the exact same character in different places in time and space, only to die a tragic/heroic death that made you wonder just who she was. Then they turned her into the official Companion and in either the very first episode or the very second episode, they undid all the good they had done with her up to that point. And the writing for the character has gotten steadily worse ever since. She's like the reverse Mickey; he started off as a horrible character who ended up growing into a good character. She started off as a great character has has turned into a blah character.
 

THM

New member
Sep 27, 2014
218
0
0
I wasn't that sold on the episode the first time I saw it; it was okay, maybe not that great, but okay. Having seen it twice, it's grown on me. I didn't get the abortion subtext the first time around, though I can see how that could be read into it. I agree that the end scene was really good. Probably would've been better if they'd had more time to flesh out the story.

Two things I wish they would change are getting rid of the mumbling and to make a cleaner break with Matt Smith's Doctor. Seriously; I have to keep putting on subtitles to watch this series. I like that Capaldi is more intense and soft-spoken, but you can be both and still be able to get your lines across to the audience. The 'clean-break' thing is smaller, but still important; they need to get Capaldi his own (music) theme and his own screwdriver (I thought the old west-type theme from the first episode was good). Keeping stuff from the previous Doctor sends a mixed message, like not even the show is that enthusiastic about the new Doctor. And if the show isn't, the viewers won't be, either.

shadowmagus said:
Oh boo-hoo. The Doctor isn't a funy and cheeky alien there to whisk maidens around the galaxy. Stuff it. You should have known the type of Doctor we were going to get when they cast Capaldi. Not that he can't do a certain amount of levity but seriously, have you seen the roles this guy takes?!
I agree; and people should also remember that even in his earlier 'Who-verse' roles, he wasn't exactly doing light stuff - hell, in his Torchwood role, he kills his entire family and then himself.

Peter Capaldi is not Matt Smith - his Doctor isn't going to be like Smith's, and I think part of the problem is that partly the show needs to be more supportive of this new Doctor, and make that clean break with the past. And partly, maybe we the viewers need to cut them some slack - not too much, but some. :)

- THM
 

Alpha Maeko

Uh oh, better get Maeko!
Apr 14, 2010
573
0
0
In my opinion, Clara should've stopped when she fulfilled the Impossible Girl status at the end of the last season.

I like how dark the Doctor is getting in his old age and (maybe?) final regeneration. It really shows how grouchy and negative he could've been all this time and makes you appreciate what he used to be. I think he's going to reconcile with Clara at some point, maybe become a bit less gruff.

But if they go nowhere with this darker side of him, I'm gonna shake my fist and stuff. Norly, I will.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,349
362
88
harpere said:
Are we really saying that between 2014 and 2049 not only will none of those programs have made any progress but they won't even exist anymore?
Maybe. Because those programs depend on future politics and economy. Those programs could had been canceled from here to 2049 because of wars and overthrown goverments. Prediction of human civilization isn't an exact science (psychohistory hasn't been created... yet)
 

Jeroenr

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2013
255
0
21
castlewise said:
I didn't like it until I thought about it a bit. I think the thing with the egg dissolving and everything working out is supposed to be total BS. See, the practical choice is to kill the moon creature, it has to be. Sometimes you have to sacrifice for the good of the many (ask Typhoid Mary) and its sad but it happens. Only someone with the Doctor's knowledge and foresight could know that things would turn out OK. Its total BS that it does turn out OK, but that's the point. Clara (and the audience) couldn't have known things would turn out well if the creature was saved. But she did what the Doctor would have wanted her to do, against the wishes of the entire planet even. That's why what she does is so annoying and why she's so mad at the end. The Doctor is making her like him, except she doesn't have the capacity to do that kind of thing responsibly.
Nor does the Doctor, he needs a companion to balance him out.
This time he had the foresight to "bud out" and rightfully so.
unlike in "The waters of Mars", there he chooses to interfere at a fixed point and messes up.

So i don't think Clara's anger was entirely justified.
Although she doesn't have to like making that choice, i think the doctor was right by letting her(them) make it.


The dialog in the last 2 episodes between Clara and the Doctor was mostly arguing and yelling.
There were rumors of Clara leaving after this season, and i must say with how things are now i am starting to belief them.
 

Boba Frag

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,288
0
0
Liking these reviews, though I wish the phrase 'cord cutters' & where to watc the show didn't jarringly reappear as if pasted from the first one every time...

I'm delighted to get that info, just.. yikes, that really feels shoved into an otherwise great bit of writing.

Currently trying not to build an effigy of Moffat to burn after that episode...

It's not that it's bad at all, I'm just getting increasingly weary of this violent, slap happy abusive Clara, and the Doctor's bizarrely erratic (even for him) moods.
 

Doclector

New member
Aug 22, 2009
5,010
0
0
I didn't even think about the terrible science, I was too distracted by the doctor being written, once again, as a massive asshole. I really, really hope that it gets better, and that Capaldi isn't blamed for it. I like capaldi's portrayal, but I get the feeling the writers are getting carried away with making this a less "nice" doctor.
 

rofltehcat

New member
Jul 24, 2009
635
0
0
I found the episode to be pretty mixed. A few moments were nice but many others were just strange or bad.

And in the end the thing somehow lays a new egg, directly after hatching, that has the same gravitational pull as the old moon. How conveniently stupid. If they wanted a new moon, why not make the thing into a phoenix? It hatches, flies around the globe for a few days (glowing brightly) looking for others of its kind. Then it "dies" and goes back into its egg. They could also have used the "last alien of its kind, so alone" to make the Doctor not look like a massive twat.
 

Deimir

New member
Jul 3, 2008
69
0
0
Boba Frag said:
Liking these reviews, though I wish the phrase 'cord cutters' & where to watc the show didn't jarringly reappear as if pasted from the first one every time...
It's definitely being copy-pasted, the same typo is there every week.

Up until the eggshell dissolving and the moon immediately being replaced, I thought the episode was fine. Not good, not bad, just...fine. The thing that's really getting to me about Capaldi's Doctor isn't his attitude towards other people, it's how he seems incapable of understanding day-to-day human existence. It could be an interesting quirk of his new personality if it was just played off here and there so we could have a laugh and move on, but it's constantly being shoved into our faces with no chance to cool down. See the whole "Soldier/Maths Teacher" argument that permeated last week's episode for an example.
 

Boba Frag

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,288
0
0
Deimir said:
Boba Frag said:
Liking these reviews, though I wish the phrase 'cord cutters' & where to watc the show didn't jarringly reappear as if pasted from the first one every time...
It's definitely being copy-pasted, the same typo is there every week.

Up until the eggshell dissolving and the moon immediately being replaced, I thought the episode was fine. Not good, not bad, just...fine. The thing that's really getting to me about Capaldi's Doctor isn't his attitude towards other people, it's how he seems incapable of understanding day-to-day human existence. It could be an interesting quirk of his new personality if it was just played off here and there so we could have a laugh and move on, but it's constantly being shoved into our faces with no chance to cool down. See the whole "Soldier/Maths Teacher" argument that permeated last week's episode for an example.

Glad I'm not the only one who was getting a twitch over the eye about that...

You nailed it, that's exactly what the problem with the writing at the moment- quirks are being over used & shoved in our faces as somehow a relevant plot or character development point.

Again, I dread the overall arc of the series coming to anything that isn't pure guff.
Yep, spot on again about the 'Soldier/Maths teacher' clunk. I don't mind the Doctor being more alien, I do mind him forgetting several centuries worth of memories of dealing with humans...

Also.... When do we get our Hunt for Gallifrey arc??

Sorry, rant over... Also that barn they visited during Listen doesn't count!
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
harpere said:
Doctor Who's "Kill the Moon" Is a Mess of Pseudoscience

The Doctor takes Clara and Courtney, one of her students, on a lunar field-trip. It's no surprise that things go terribly wrong.

Read Full Article
Who the hell watches Doctor Who looking for realistic, or even marginally consistent, science? It's like watching Star Wars and complaining that the sound in space and space magic ruined it for you.
 

faeshadow

New member
Feb 4, 2008
60
0
0
The Doctor is not always going to be a nice guy. The First Doctor nearly murdered an injured, helpless man because he was holding them up when they were trying to escape. The Third Doctor was hideously sexist at times in the beginning. The Fourth Doctor snapped a man's neck with his bare hands without batting an eyelash. The Sixth Doctor nearly murdered his companion, verbally abused her when they started out, and made jokes while two men melted to death in a vat of acid. The Seventh Doctor psychologically tormented his companion in order to mold her into the woman he wanted her to be. Then there was the war. And let's not forget about the Time Lord Victorious.

Some incarnations of the Doctor are nice people down to their core. (And even they have moments of saying unkind things in the heat of the moment.) Most of them aren't.

Besides, Twelve was right. What did they want him to do, hold their hand and guide them through making a decision that would affect their entire race? Why does he always have to have that decision on his shoulders when there are people right there who are perfectly capable of making the decision on their own.

Was he a dick about it? Sure. He was pissed off. The stupid blonde astronaut's first question was how to kill a living being. Everything went wrong from that moment. You can see it on his face. From that moment, he was flat-out done. Clara had every right to be angry, but the shit coming out of her mouth made no sense. In fact, the dialogue throughout the entire episode was an utter mess. And the very idea that Clara would be uncertain if the Doctor would leave them to die is utterly ludicrous. Being a dick =/= being an evil bastard that leaves innocent people (including a child) to die just because one of them said something to make him angry. Clara should have known this, and should have expressed more confidence.

In the end...I don't think new writers should be given episodes that have this much character arc weight. Especially not new writers who obviously don't get the show, or Twelve. Twelve has never been utterly rotten to the core. Twelve cares about Clara's well-being.

Oh, and on the subject of special, no...Courtney isn't special. She's the kind of kid you find at a school that's the school bully, to the point of even bullying the teachers. She's a horrible child and will grow up to be the kind of person the Doctor fights against. Screw her. Whatever happened to the days when it was the underdog that was given the special treatment, rather than the school bully? "You kicked a hole in my life!" Yeah, well, maybe now you know how the kids and teachers you probably abuse at school feel.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
faeshadow said:
Oh, and on the subject of special, no...Courtney isn't special. She's the kind of kid you find at a school that's the school bully, to the point of even bullying the teachers. She's a horrible child and will grow up to be the kind of person the Doctor fights against. Screw her. Whatever happened to the days when it was the underdog that was given the special treatment, rather than the school bully? "You kicked a hole in my life!" Yeah, well, maybe now you know how the kids and teachers you probably abuse at school feel.
Yeah that kind of annoyed me too. "Am I not special?" No, of course you're not special, you're a annoying little oik whos terrible at school and is a bully. You haven't done anything, haven't achieved anything, you haven't earned the right to /be/ "special". You're special, as much as anyone else is. Which for the most part, is not at all.
 

Wulfram77

New member
Dec 8, 2013
43
0
0
Honestly, the problem was that they mentioned the science too specifically. I mean, they could have just quickly brushed off the spider things as like bacteria are to humans and I probably wouldn't blink, but when you get all specific then it's too obvious rubbish.

Though I also wonder if they were conceived as something more simple and blobby and then got shifted to spiders because they were though to be insufficiently scary.
 

faeshadow

New member
Feb 4, 2008
60
0
0
elvor0 said:
faeshadow said:
Oh, and on the subject of special, no...Courtney isn't special. She's the kind of kid you find at a school that's the school bully, to the point of even bullying the teachers. She's a horrible child and will grow up to be the kind of person the Doctor fights against. Screw her. Whatever happened to the days when it was the underdog that was given the special treatment, rather than the school bully? "You kicked a hole in my life!" Yeah, well, maybe now you know how the kids and teachers you probably abuse at school feel.
Yeah that kind of annoyed me too. "Am I not special?" No, of course you're not special, you're a annoying little oik whos terrible at school and is a bully. You haven't done anything, haven't achieved anything, you haven't earned the right to /be/ "special". You're special, as much as anyone else is. Which for the most part, is not at all.
Yeah, normally I love the "everybody's special" thing, but I'm sorry, Courtney is a horrible person. It's like if Ten had gone up to that stock broker asshole who was bullying the Van Hoffs in Voyage of the Damned and went on about how special he is. No. He was an asshole and a bully. Some people don't deserve to be told they're special.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
If you thought using "pseudoscience" as a criticism would be valid for Doctor Who, then perhaps it is time you stopped reviewing the series entirely.

Remember, we had a localised time hole last week, and a dimensional shift bomb the week before that, and i cant even remember what came before that because either my memory is shit or i really didnt enjoy that episode.