Donald Rumsfeld Has Released an Incredibly Frustrating Mobile Game

JaredJones

New member
Jun 8, 2015
452
0
0
Donald Rumsfeld Has Released an Incredibly Frustrating Mobile Game

//cdn.themis-media.com/media/global/images/library/deriv/1271/1271753.png

True to it's creator, it's been dubbed "the most diabolical version of solitaire ever devised."

If you're like me, you've probably spent a lot of your mental energy over the years pondering about the goings on of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Is he keeping busy? Has he moved on to other business ventures? Are those business ventures video game based?

To put your worries at ease: the short answers to those questions are yes, yes, and you bet your ass they are!

Believe it or not, the 83-year-old Rumsfeld has apparently been shifting his focus from politics to mobile app development in recent years, and has just released his first game: [http://churchillsolitaire.com/].

What makes Churchill Solitaire different than just regular old solitaire, you ask? Well, aside from boasting a title sequence comprised of black and white, World War 2 archival footage, Churchill Solitaire also features a 104 card deck as opposed to the usual 52 cards. Diabolical indeed!

"It's a card game that can frustrate even the most skilled player because a single move can make or break an entire game." described Rumsfeld in a developer essay on Medium [https://medium.com/@DonRumsfeld/at-83-i-decided-to-develop-an-app-dadd4e53d342#.fcktl1r6b].

"A number of hands are simply unwinnable. But the most steadfast players will gamely soldier on to find their way to victory."

And the early reviews for Churchill Solitaire? Well, they're mixed to say the least. Kotaku's rundown of the game [http://kotaku.com/donald-rumsfelds-solitaire-game-puts-futility-at-your-f-1756000473] noted the game's forced landscape perspective and cramped layout among the game's aesthetic errors, stating "The obstacle to building your columns is that they don't really fit on the phone screen. Shortly into my first game, Rumsfeld Solitaire warned me that I was getting too close to the edge, and advised me to rotate my device to get more room. It was Rumsfeld Solitaire, of course, that had chosen to put the phone in horizontal layout in the first place."

But the major issue with the game? Oh, only that it's apparently rigged:

Still, a fundamental error of design wasn't going to stop me. I played on, itty-bitty cards and all, and as I did so, an understated fact about the game became clear: It's rigged.

It has to be, by design. There are difficulty levels. The only way to set a solitaire game at different levels of difficulty is to stack the deck. The only way out was to spend more time, or start spending money, on something that was never really going to work out.

So if you're looking for a nearly-impossible mobile app game that requires "the pessimism of intelligence and the optimism of will," head over to the game's official page [http://churchillsolitaire.com/] to download the free trial version for iOS devices (sorry Android users) today!

Source: Washingtonian [http://www.washingtonian.com/2016/02/01/donald-rumsfeld-churchill-solitaire-app-known-unknowns/]

Permalink
 

micuu

New member
Mar 28, 2014
18
0
0
Rumsfeld is as bad at making mobile games as he is at invading and occupying countries in the middle-east. Who knew?
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
Wait, how can you implement micro-transactions into solitaire? That confuddles me. Typical right-wing tactics, cheat and charge. Plus the game looks drier than his mum after a sensual Bush speech. Perhaps "fun" was just some distant myth the other kids talked about at school when they thought he wasn't listening. Give this guy some acid or something before i cry for another wasted soul.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
You play for three minutes and declare victory. Then the game reveals there are another entire set of rules that you didn't understand at all when you started playing, and you have to play for another twelve hours before admitting to a stalemate.
 

LordMonty

Badgerlord
Jul 2, 2008
570
0
0
It all goes to charity, but I can probally buy two decks of cards and play it on a table and donate to a charity I want to support for a little more but hey people love apps.
 

moose7

New member
Mar 5, 2014
9
0
0
Callate said:
You play for three minutes and declare victory. Then the game reveals there are another entire set of rules that you didn't understand at all when you started playing, and you have to play for another twelve hours before admitting to a stalemate.
To win you just need to surge really hard. Then when that doesn't work blame the black guy that tries to fix your mess after you destroyed 2 phones and wasted trillions.