I've watched Dr. Phil for a long time. He's a popular punching bag for us "young people" (I'm a 21 year old male, if that matters) sometimes, but I really respect him because he's a pretty damn good psycologist, something I aspire to be. His shows have sparked some pretty long and fun debates with my wife about issues featured on his show.
I will say that he has done a few shows in the past dealing with video game addictions and he can seem a bit accusatory sometimes (I remember an EverQuest addict a few years back), but for the most part he treats it like any other addiction.
I don't like this article because there are a few quotes that are out of context, because I watched the episode in question and agreed with Phil completely.
I'm unsure as to the point of this article other than as a vehicle for ragging on Dr. Phil because you feel like it. You quote stuff out of context to make Dr. Phil seem like a prick, but then go on to agree with the core of his statements and admit that she is addicted and needs to stop...so why did does this article exist, what's the point?
I will say that he has done a few shows in the past dealing with video game addictions and he can seem a bit accusatory sometimes (I remember an EverQuest addict a few years back), but for the most part he treats it like any other addiction.
I don't like this article because there are a few quotes that are out of context, because I watched the episode in question and agreed with Phil completely.
What's wrong with stating the truth? That's one of the fundamental things that you have to tell an addict: that this thing they are addicted to (in the case of video games) isn't real in that sense, and that if you walk away from it, the sky doesn't start falling."There aren't really any crops," Dr. Phil informed her. "That's just a little image on a screen. They're not going to die." Thanks for pointing that out, Doc.
This is completely out of context because that statement was posed more of a question to Jennifer in order to illustrate the lengths that Teresa would go to to get the computer all to herself.In all honesty, Teresa has resorted to some tricky business to get her daughter off the computer. "She unplugged the router, so you would think the Internet had gone down, and as soon as you went away, she plugged it back in and went back to tending her crops," Dr. Phil told the daughter, Jennifer. I'm sorry, Doc, but nobody likes a tattle-tale.
I'm unsure as to the point of this article other than as a vehicle for ragging on Dr. Phil because you feel like it. You quote stuff out of context to make Dr. Phil seem like a prick, but then go on to agree with the core of his statements and admit that she is addicted and needs to stop...so why did does this article exist, what's the point?
This is the pinnacle of pointlessness. It's completely irrelevant to the topic of the article, which is itself weak and full of the writer's self-importance. Since everyone is about respect in this article...-100 respect to the Escapist's "news room" for this pointless and out-of-context article.You'll notice that none of that advice includes watching Dr. Phil's show.