I really hope it doesn't go with Western Style Character building as that I personally find is the biggest flaw in WRPGs.
And presumably in Australia some time next year. So I won't get to see this game for a while...Logan Westbrook said:Dragon Quest IX was released in Japan in July 2009 and sold over two million copies in its first weekend. The game is due to be released in the US on July 11th, and in Europe on July 23rd.
Allegedly not being a JRPG doesn't appear to have impacted DQ9's sales in Japan, where at four million copies shifted it was the highest selling game of 2009.Grey_Focks said:Okay, I'm confused....who is this supposed to appeal to? JRPG fans are going to hate the sound of this, and people who don't like JRPGs (myself included) are all pretty much gonna say "bull-shit" and still not buy it.
But it's that pointless and ultimately meaningless meta-scenery that defines WRPGs. It isn't that you can actually mould your world, it's the illusion that you can... for in what RPG can you actually affect anything? The fact that a wall explains that you cannot move further is soothing, as opposed to an invisible barrier. The end result is the same, but it adds another layer to the experience.Dorian Cornelius Jasper said:The best Western RPGs are about that, but even then only to a point. More often than not, the choices you're given tend to be little better than window-dressing or superfluous in modern games.kingcom said:So the whole freedom of choice thing that western rpgs are about? Yea, thats not here...
Of course, it's your choice whether or not you want to consider Oblivion or Diablo true RPGs.
Dragon Quest has changed quite a lot over it's history. It doesn't radically reinvent everything every time, but they've never been afraid to experiment with new gameplay ideas.AboveUp said:Uh, oh... The whole reason I still loved Dragon Quest is because it stayed true to itself and didn't change, unlike Final Fantasy.
I love you for this post. Yay for making people eat their words!ahlycks said:mmm final fantasy 4...unacomn said:Does it have: a non linear story or that at least makes sense, characters that don't look like 10 year old kids, non turn-based 3 character party combat and a game world that makes sense?
If it has any two of those, it's an RPG, if not, it's a JRPG.
a non linear story OR one that at least makes sense... Check, it makes sense.
Characters that do not look like 10 year old kids... check, they do not look like little kids.
does not have turn based 3 player combat... Check, there are 5.
A game world that makes sense... Umm, makes no more sense than something like oblivion so check.
Hey guess what guys, unacomn has just found out that final fantasy 4 is not a JRPG! What an amazing system you have thought up of.
A lot times when a Japanese developer brings over a game you see a little news blurb where 'Such and such says they developed game with westeners in mine.' then it has such and such quoted saying 'When we were making this we really wanted to focus on the western audience. It's not really a JRPG in the traditional sense, really.' They did it for FFXIII.LeonLethality said:When did they say this before?For.I.Am.Mad said:They always say this.