E3: Lord of the Rings: War in the North

allistairp

New member
Apr 22, 2011
274
0
0
E3: Lord of the Rings: War in the North

Lord of the Rings co-op action: Now with giant eagles!

When I first set my eyes on War in the North, I thought it was some sort of sequel to Pandemic's lackluster Lord of the Rings: Conquest. As it turns out, WitN couldn't be more different, with an emphasis on a linear campaign and cooperative action - more importantly, it's actually good.

Since being pleasantly surprised by the game at South by Southwest last March, I've had hopes that Snowblind Studios would make a game that lives up to the developer's classic Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance. So far, so good. The E3 demo presented a new area and combat features, mainly a giant eagle you can call in for support.

War in the North is a three-player cooperative action-RPG with loot, an enjoyable combat system and a original storyline with moral choices. The game is a hack-n-slash, so repetition is inevitable. Like all good entries in the genre, WitN avoids fatigue by stringing the player along with new loot, ability unlocks and addicting combat.

The three players choose between an elf, dwarf and ranger. Each has their own play style, but perhaps they aren't as distinct as they could be. I was disappointed to find that running head-on into combat was more effective than long-distance archery, while playing as the ranger.

The player has a weak and strong attack which can be strung into combos; striking with a strong attack while an enemy is dazed results in an execution and extra xp. Cooperative play makes the waves of enemies manageable, but also helps players level-up faster with additional xp given for co-op combos. Incentives like these make sticking together the best choice, even when one player gets annoyed at another for hording all the item drops.

Each ability has its own recharge time, which don't last all that long. As a result, you'll rely on each character's abilities which alter the rhythm of combat. For instance, the ranger has a cloak ability that lets the player sneak up behind an enemy and perform a one-hit kill. Each character shares the ability to summon a giant eagle that swoops down and attacks an enemy. This is especially useful when facing a boss.

LotR games haven't had the strongest track record as of late, but War in the North might change that. With offline, online and mixed co-op, Snowblind's latest is a welcome diversion among fall's co-op shooters and a faithful entry in the LotR canon.

Middle-Earth and co-op fans can pick up the game August 24 for 360, PS3 and PC.


Permalink
 

Snowy Rainbow

New member
Jun 13, 2011
676
0
0
allistairp said:
As it turns out, WitN couldn't be more different, with an emphasis on a linear campaign and cooperative action - more importantly, it's actually good.
You are determining the game to be good from a trailer and production staff interviews? That's a bold claim.
 

Caveworm

New member
Jun 8, 2011
180
0
0
I really hope this game is good.

Decent LOTR games are quite thin on the ground. Looks quite gritty and gory. Yay.
 

CoL0sS

New member
Nov 2, 2010
711
0
0
Certainly looks promising, but I seriously doubt it's gonna bring anything new to the table. But it's a hack-n-slash RPG so as long as characters play differently, loot is varied and combat fun and fast paced it should be fine. It's a welcome addition to LotR games and I'm gonna give it a chance. Too bad LotR: The White Council was canceled.
 

allistairp

New member
Apr 22, 2011
274
0
0
Snowy Rainbow said:
allistairp said:
As it turns out, WitN couldn't be more different, with an emphasis on a linear campaign and cooperative action - more importantly, it's actually good.
You are determining the game to be good from a trailer and production staff interviews? That's a bold claim.
This preview was based on a hands-on demo, as were many other E3 previews we posted.
 

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
Can I please get a game based in the First or Second Age of Middle Earth? Pretty please? The end of the Third Age has been done to death.
 

Snowy Rainbow

New member
Jun 13, 2011
676
0
0
allistairp said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
allistairp said:
As it turns out, WitN couldn't be more different, with an emphasis on a linear campaign and cooperative action - more importantly, it's actually good.
You are determining the game to be good from a trailer, production staff interviews and an E3 demo? That's a bold claim.
This preview was based on a hands-on demo, as were many other E3 previews we posted.
I've modified the quoted post to amend it.
 

AlternatePFG

New member
Jan 22, 2010
2,858
0
0
I think it looks cool and I'll probably buy it, but I don't really like the way they are handling magic. Much like Conquest (which I hated), some of the magic does not really fit with how it was in the books/movies.
 

Dragonborne88

New member
Oct 26, 2009
345
0
0
I played this at PAXEast. It was actually pretty fun, I was the Dwarf and he has a lot of "tank" abilities, like taunt and charge and whatnot, and my friend played the Ranger, who was the DPS guy. The Dev played the Elf Wizard, who was basically support, I think, but the guy kind of chilled behind us firing the occasional spell, so I didn't see it much.

It was like a simplified MMO setting, but with friends, the game could be amazing with the tactics required. And the combat was very enjoyable and satisfying feeling.
 

Your Nightmare

New member
May 28, 2010
363
0
0
I actually rather enjoyed Conquest...but I love most hack & slash games


And that Eagle was kicking ass towards the end of the trailer.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,832
0
0
I like what I'm seeing so far, but I couldn't help but shake my head when Amy Drobeck made the following statement:

"For Tolkien, the Great Eagles are a representation of the order of nature..."

No...just, no. Tolkien hated allegory in all its forms and never intended any part of Middle-Earth to be a representation of anything. The Great Eagles are awesome giant birds and nothing more.

Still, the game itself looks promising.
 

repeating integers

New member
Mar 17, 2010
3,315
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
I like what I'm seeing so far, but I couldn't help but shake my head when Amy Drobeck made the following statement:

"For Tolkien, the Great Eagles are a representation of the order of nature..."

No...just, no. Tolkien hated allegory in all its forms and never intended any part of Middle-Earth to be a representation of anything. The Great Eagles are awesome giant birds and nothing more.

Still, the game itself looks promising.
I am reminded a quote from one of Isaac Asimov's opening mini-essays: "What makes you think you understand your story, just because you wrote it?"

Tolkein may have not intended anything to have any deeper meaning, but that doesn't mean people can't interpret it their own way. If that guy wishes to see Great Eagles as a representation of the order of nature, more power to him.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,832
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
I am reminded a quote from one of Isaac Asimov's opening mini-essays: "What makes you think you understand your story, just because you wrote it?"

Tolkein may have not intended anything to have any deeper meaning, but that doesn't mean people can't interpret it their own way. If that guy wishes to see Great Eagles as a representation of the order of nature, more power to him.
Well, perhaps I'm just kind of fed up with people trying to impose their personal interpretations as some sort of incontrovertible fact. For example, I remember taking a poetry class in college where the professor would ask for feedback on what we felt the various poems we read meant. Eventually, each "discussion" would turn into her trying to convince us that her interpretation was the "right" one. When it came time for the final exam, you had better use her version as the answer if you wanted to get the question right.

It would have been better for the narrator to say, "The Great Eagles are often seen as a representation of the order of nature." To say Tolkien interpreted them as such when he clearly didn't gives the wrong impression.

To be fair though, I should have re-worded my post a bit to say "To Tolkien, the Great Eagles were awesome giant birds and nothing more."
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Can we please have a PC Hack'n'slash without coop? So sick and tired of this... Oh hey, this game looks good... COOP!! Oh, looks fun... TWO PLAYERS AND MOOOORE

ehh. I can't wait for Diablo 3.
 

Compatriot Block

New member
Jan 28, 2009
702
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
Neverhoodian said:
I like what I'm seeing so far, but I couldn't help but shake my head when Amy Drobeck made the following statement:

"For Tolkien, the Great Eagles are a representation of the order of nature..."

No...just, no. Tolkien hated allegory in all its forms and never intended any part of Middle-Earth to be a representation of anything. The Great Eagles are awesome giant birds and nothing more.

Still, the game itself looks promising.
I am reminded a quote from one of Isaac Asimov's opening mini-essays: "What makes you think you understand your story, just because you wrote it?"

Tolkein may have not intended anything to have any deeper meaning, but that doesn't mean people can't interpret it their own way. If that guy wishes to see Great Eagles as a representation of the order of nature, more power to him.
I've never understood that line of thought. Of course the author has more say in the representation of his work. If a reader decides that it's actually, say, a criticism of capitalism, the only reason for him to claim that the author has no more authority than anyone else is if the author disagrees with the reader's conclusion.

What I'm trying to say is, I just see it as an easy way to attack the credibility of those who don't see the same metaphors as you.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Abedeus said:
Can we please have a PC Hack'n'slash without coop? So sick and tired of this... Oh hey, this game looks good... COOP!! Oh, looks fun... TWO PLAYERS AND MOOOORE

ehh. I can't wait for Diablo 3.
Pretty much yeah. I was hoping for a nice single player game with this one, forcing co-op is just, lame.
 

DalekJaas

New member
Dec 3, 2008
1,028
0
0
Does anybody know if this loosely follows the story of the war in the north set by LOTR Battle For Middle Earth 2? If we saw some returning characters from that I would be extremely happy, but if it doesn't interconnect or re-writes that story I will not bother purchasing. I really, really enjoyed that interpretation of the war in the north and I consider it canon for the whole LOTR series.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
Compatriot Block said:
OhJohnNo said:
Neverhoodian said:
I like what I'm seeing so far, but I couldn't help but shake my head when Amy Drobeck made the following statement:

"For Tolkien, the Great Eagles are a representation of the order of nature..."

No...just, no. Tolkien hated allegory in all its forms and never intended any part of Middle-Earth to be a representation of anything. The Great Eagles are awesome giant birds and nothing more.

Still, the game itself looks promising.
I am reminded a quote from one of Isaac Asimov's opening mini-essays: "What makes you think you understand your story, just because you wrote it?"

Tolkein may have not intended anything to have any deeper meaning, but that doesn't mean people can't interpret it their own way. If that guy wishes to see Great Eagles as a representation of the order of nature, more power to him.
I've never understood that line of thought. Of course the author has more say in the representation of his work. If a reader decides that it's actually, say, a criticism of capitalism, the only reason for him to claim that the author has no more authority than anyone else is if the author disagrees with the reader's conclusion.

What I'm trying to say is, I just see it as an easy way to attack the credibility of those who don't see the same metaphors as you.
Drobeck didn't just see a metaphor, however. She attributed it to Tolkein as if that was his intention. As far as "what is a symbol?", which seems to be where this is going, I agree that a symbol can be created by anyone at any time from anything.
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
I'm getting this no matter what. Huge LOTR fan, just please let his be good. Let it also have a good story, and fun enough so I can convince my friends to pick this up.