EA Cuts Taliban From Medal of Honor

Decabo

New member
Dec 16, 2009
302
0
0
I'm no longer going to play this game. I wasn't even interested in the multiplayer portion of this game, and this still pisses me off.
 

Larnx

New member
Apr 13, 2009
69
0
0
So...The taliban get their name changed, but we're still fighting Nazis and Vietnamese soldiers? Such an hypocritical subject.
 

BrunDeign

New member
Feb 14, 2008
448
0
0
If people are actually satisfied with the change in name by itself, I will lose all hope for mankind. Is a member of the Taliban by any other name a member of the Taliban? YES
 

GLo Jones

Activate the Swagger
Feb 13, 2010
1,192
0
0
I don't really see an issue. They'll still represent the Taliban, and I'll still refer to them as the Taliban.
 

Vault boy Eddie

New member
Feb 18, 2009
1,800
0
0
Meh, Op For still works. No harm no foul. And hey, if it bothers yall that much, call them taliban in your houses when you get the game and stop having a titty fit.
 

Korey Von Doom

New member
May 18, 2008
473
0
0
Oh cool so all they will probably be doing is changing their name to something generic and doing nothing else and everything will be cool.

People are overreacting idiots.
 

Reagus

New member
Apr 1, 2009
111
0
0
Poomanchu745 said:
Javex said:
I'm disappointed in you, EA.
You are disappointed that they listened to soldiers and families of soldiers and used better judgment in making a decision? It's not like they were being forced to do anything. They chose to heed the wishes of many people who's lives have been changed by their interaction with the Taliban?

I wouldn't have minded either way really, but it sounds like they at least used good reasoning and judgment in this call.
Well, they couldn't really say "Oh, we bowed down to media stereotypical media uproar demeaning video games as an inferior media and make a load of scare mongering"

This decision is a load of shit, and EA should be ashamed of themselves. Now when ANYTHING controversial comes to gaming, narrow minded eejits will protest thinking that they can get it removed, ignoring the fact that its portrayed in other media like films and books with no problem at all.

Fucking pathetic, GET SOME BALLS EA
 

Epitome

New member
Jul 17, 2009
703
0
0
Everything I would say about the cowardice of EA has already been said here. All that is left is to no longer purchase this game.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Sad. People getting upset over their own negativity impacts on people trying to show the aspects of that negativity in a true light.

Feelings are more important than the truth now. :(

Edit: Perhaps they should have asked the SOLDIERS rather than the families and friends. Because, let's face it, they're the ones doing the goddam fighting.
 

CheckD3

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,181
0
0
I don't mind that they changed, but I wonder, what about playing as communist or Japanese? Where's all the backlash to playing as Nazis? I'll tell you why this caused so much hype and why so many people bitched about it, because it's current, and the current voices are the ones that matter nowadays

Ask anyone who fought in WWII and if you told them that in this war game you could be either American soldier or a German Nazi and they'd freak out I'd guess and produce an uproar. However, people would turn them down as crazy or old and nothing would change.

I understand the sensitivity of the Taliban subject today, but if we can play as Japanese soldiers, who also attacked American Soil at Pearl Harbor, why can't we play as Taliban soldiers? Gaming is a way to express point of views we couldn't normally play as. I vote that the next MoH or CoD game that comes out gives us a campaign as either a Nazi or a Taliban or a Japanese or a Korean or Vietnamese soldier. It could give us gameplay that we never thought we'd experience. A German who joins the Nazis in promise of fighting for his homeland. Propaganda videos playing before you fire a weapon, the more you fight, the more videos you watch and speeches you view, the field of vision changes. Or Japanese soldiers where you have to sacrifice yourself in a bombing run and you see the afterlife and feel honorable the way they were taught. The Taliban where you spend your time in a desert environment planting explosives in the ground and such.

While I'm not saying that any of the parties above in their contexts are right, giving us new PoVs besides Gun toting hero American would be nice. I've got enough games where I can wear my American flag proudly, what about a new PoV developers?
 

Fidelias

New member
Nov 30, 2009
1,406
0
0
I could understand taking the Taliban away as a playable faction, but this? This doesn't solve the issue! Everyone is still going to go after EA because all they did was change a name, and the gamers are going to go after EA because they changed it to a cruddy name! That's probably the stupidest choice EA coud have made.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Well, they just lost themselves a customer.

Well done EA, you pathetic douches. Bowing to people who probably werent even going to buy your games anyway!
 

hydrahh

New member
Apr 16, 2009
69
0
0
"In other words, you can still play as an AK-47-toting, suicide-bombing extremist trying to kill American forces in an ongoing, real-world conflict, you just can't have the T-word at the top of your scoreboard. "

^^ Probably the most important line of that article. ^^

EA will do whatever it takes to make an extra few bucks. If changing a name is gonna keep the game off of FOX News as the latest "murder simulator" that now trains young Americans how to become Jihadists (And you know that's the kinda spin they would put on it,) they will do it. Bad press will cost them way more on game sales through the general public because "The news told us this is a bad game" than it will cost them sales of video games forum people being dissapointed about free speech.

Just take comfort in the fact that you still get to unload virtual automatic weapons at virtual brown people in a virtual sandy environment.