Well, it remains to be seen if it's going to be alright that was as well. Just because EA says that it's "fine" at the momenet doesn't mean that it is, I mean the annoucement is still fairly hot off the presses.IamQ said:This just shows how stupid people are.
"They're called 'Talibans', that horribly wrong, you hate America, you fucker!"
"What if we don't change anything, except that we rename them to 'Opposing Force'?"
"Well then, that's alright."
To be entirely blunt, I am one of those who was against the entire idea, and I think they shouldn't even have a playable arab faction for multiplayer. Heck, I'd even go so far as to say that they probably should release without multiplayer at all if that's what they want to do with it.
I understand the perspective (mostly left wing) on these forums. However at the same time I find it deeply disturbing that people had issues with "Seven Days Of Fallujah" which had US/Allied troops shooting Muslims, but for some reason think that it's a good thing to have playable Taliban who can kill US/Allied troops in this game.
I don't think anyone has talked about gamers hating America, but at the same time if someone DID say that, it wouldn't be entirely out of line. Looking at how things have been playing out, one can certainly get that impression.
I think the problem is that there is so much anti-war rhetoric out there tied to the left wing, and attempts to portray this as a right wing war, as opposed to an American war... not to mention all the "peace at any price" junk which Democrats are infamous for... that people are getting hyped up for anything that seems contreversial and against the war that they aren't stopping to think about how tasteless something like this is.
I personally hope that EA decides to further relent and make Multiplayer a simple contest between genetic looking special forces guys or something, rather than including any kind of muslim themed faction given the theatre the game is set in and the current conflicts.