Unless you're a texture artist or fairly senior you're probably employed in an adhoc manner as a self employed artist and let go between projects anyway.jurnag12 said:
Then you haven't played a PC version of CoD lately.Kumagawa Misogi said:
And on that same day pigs would fly, water would start falling upwards and satan would be taking the grand skiing tour through the snowy mountains of hell.RJ 17 said:
I know, it'd be absolutely beautiful! >lancar said:
*insert evil laugh here*
While that's totally your right, why would this be the piece of information that makes your decision? It's pretty hard to spin this in a negative that isn't retreading older complaints, not that you'd know it from listening to some people.AstaresPanda said:
I wouldn't get my hopes up. Even if they weren't blowing smoke up our asses when they said the guys who did the last medal of honor weren't the group working on it, we're still left with DICE, and DICE isn't what it used to be.TiberiusEsuriens said:I don't play Battlefield, but I do love Battlefront. As DICE is going to be making the latter, I don't know whether to be worried that this is all going to repeat again, or that they're working out all the kinks now so that Battlefront's launch will be flawless.
... who am I kidding
I have never been run over, therefore people don't get run over!Kumagawa Misogi said:
MarsAtlas said:
Johny_X2 said:
*In my best David Attenborough voice*amaranth_dru said:
Awh, I forgot text doesn't convey facetiousness very well... Normally I tend to support EA because I feel they have got the short end of the stick while some other pub's get what feels like a free pass. But in general I don't like the anti-big Dev attitude a lot of folk have 'round these parts because I feel its detrimental to progress. I've always felt that EA is a decent company with a bad PR department that the dev teams probably /facepalm every time PR speaks to the masses. Sure they've put out some less-than-stellar games and closed some dev studios, but not every game is going to pass muster and not every studio can survive forever.Simalacrum said:
I don't know about game crashes, but the first few months of Modern Warfare 2 were completely broken. The Infinite Care Package glitch completely broke multiplayer for a long time, to the point that I haven't bothered to play a Call of Duty game since.Kumagawa Misogi said:
Well, BF2 didn't really have permanent character or weapon progression. Characters in Galactic Domination were earned, but reset with each campaign. I liked that because it gave tactical choices for playing against a friend, making the early game more dynamic instead of all classes for everyone. The endgame ultimately gave us that option anyways so it didn't hurt. I just hope that they'll make the Dark Trooper less shitty and more like BF1.V da Mighty Taco said:
You're forgetting how the whole medal / killstreak system actually worked in Battlefront 2 while offline (it didn't affect online battles, fortunately, but did muck with spiltscreen). When you're profile has less than 4 of a given medal, you didn't a reward in battle at all. When you had 4 or more but less than 32, you got a bonus for doing certain things in battle (either an improved weapon or general buff, depending on the medal) that would last until the player died. Having 32 or more of a medal but less than 64 reduce the in-game requirements to get said reward by 25%. The real kicker though was when you hit 64 of any medal, as that medal's reward became permanent across all gametypes and the player would always spawn with the improved weapons or buff that particular medal gave you.TiberiusEsuriens said:
