EDGE of Asshattery

DragonsAteMyMarbles

You matter in this world. Smile!
Feb 22, 2009
1,206
0
0
Does this mean EA actually PAID this twat so they could call their game "Mirror's Edge"?!

EDIT: Ninja'd. By the ARTICLE. That's the second most retarded thing I've done this week.
 

4fromK

New member
Apr 15, 2009
322
0
0
I was hoping that that screen was a joke...
I was wrong :(
we should all go to e3 (it says he has a stall on his website)
and kick the shit outta him.
 

ohgodalex

New member
May 21, 2009
1,094
0
0
sravankb said:
corp (at) edgegames dot com

That's their email address. I hope someone from Anonymous can find that out. They'll cook up something good for that bastard.
inb4 personal army.

On a more serious note, I really can't stand this man. Ever since I read about him on Kotaku a month or so back, I've wanted to punch him right in the logic. Not only has he done nothing to contribute to the game industry for years, all the games he did make were absolute shit.
Thanks for the article, Shamus. It feels good to be morally outraged by something again.
 

LimeJester

New member
Mar 16, 2009
167
0
0
After reading this article and watching the SGC debate between Mark Methenitis and Jack Thompson, I am starting to think that Tim Langdell is the new arch-villian of gaming. SGC sort of vindicated you Thompson, time to hand the throne over.
 

theklng

New member
May 1, 2008
1,229
0
0
as a game developer, i am shocked to hear that this person is also on the board of IGDA (international game developers association). having done a bit of research on the case, i have chosen to forward this article to a game developer forum in order to spread the word of bad reputation of both tim langdell and the IGDA board of directors.

while having a copyright poacher on the lose without a network is one thing, having one with a vast network incorporating large companies in the industry is entirely another. i urge both gamers and game developers to research this and take a stance on the issue at hand. we should not be silenced by corporate greed or stonewalled by networks.
 

L.B. Jeffries

New member
Nov 29, 2007
2,175
0
0
Sabre_of_Pain said:
and tim langdell denies pretty much everything accusing mobigame of underhanded trickery and slander as observed here
http://www.igda.org/Forums/showthread.php?postid=224709#post224709

personally i think his denial looks quite reasonable and well written however i also think it is quite obviously damage control by his lawyers and not written by him himself

now that you have all the facts and opinions from multiple sources both biased and non it is up to you to decide whether YOU condemn him

supposedly tim langdell can be contacted at [email protected] whether this is true or not i cant be sure but i would think it is so feel free to rain your hate mail down upon him

edit: some sources say that mobigame offered to rename their game to edgy and then tim langdell trademarked that promptly thereafter i doubt this is reliable information and is likely embellished but IF it is true then tim langdell is a truely evil man indeed
Unlikely, the trademark process takes too long for him to just do it on the fly and there is the mild hope that they would actually catch it the second time around.

Thank you for the link round-up, by the way, gave a much more balanced look at the situation. You're right, Langell is just backpedaling from a PR disaster. F*** it, you reap what you sow in the legal world.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
The true purpose of copyright, patent, and trademark law has been the victim of malicious (and flagrant) abuse for a quite a while now. While their original purpose was to ensure that companies couldn't get their materials, names, and ideas stolen for the purposes of the thief making a quick buck, they have been subverted entirely for the purposes of... making a quick buck.

When a man makes a company called EGDE Gaming, that entitles him to several things: the ability to stop people from using that company's name to make money, for one. This does not however mean that he OWNS the word edge. Also, nobody thinks that the name of a game and who makes it are the same thing. Does one look at "Gears Of War" and think: that game is made by WarGear studios? Of course not: they look at the label to see who made it.

Worse yet, this company hasn't made a game in 15 YEARS. That means that the EDGE name has not been seen on store shelves for 15 years either. No worries Mr.Langdell, nobody will mistake this game for a creation of your company.

They might however been in danger of mistaking your company for 3D Realms.
 

Ginnipe

New member
May 25, 2009
533
0
0
RiffRaff said:
Hmm... I am now working a game called "Edge Edgerton's Edgy trip to the Edge" out of spite.
I think you should acually do that except secreatly have EA working on it, so that they can make it profesional, and it's all a trap so when he files a lawsuite, EA comes out of the closet and beats him up with lawers, then the escapist community just mobs him.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
Wait a minute, stop right there. I don't know what's actually going on here, but this story seems blown out of proportion. Some things don't add up. If any of it is true, which I'm certain most of it is, then there are some urban myths rolled in here. It sounds like the classic "loophole in the law" scenario that works well in urban myths. I don't believe the part about him trademarking Edge of Twilight, for instance, because I discovered that game long ago and it doesn't make any sense for them not to have trademarked the name. The law is just not with this guy... or not the way it's stated, anyway.

I trust Shamus Young, but I don't trust a few of his sources. Kotaku, for instance, is notorious for making small mistakes that add up over time.
 

CorvusE

New member
Sep 13, 2006
157
0
0
@PrototypeC Don't believe it? Check the trademark record: http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4002:ts5bhl.3.3

Word Mark EDGE OF TWILIGHT
Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Computer game programs
Standard Characters Claimed
Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Serial Number 77748665
Filing Date June 1, 2009
Current Filing Basis 1B
Original Filing Basis 1B
Owner (APPLICANT) EDGE Games Inc CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 530 South Lake Avenue Ste 171 Pasadena CALIFORNIA 91101
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE
 

METC

New member
Mar 21, 2009
137
0
0
It's interesting how several of the gaming news websites are doing articles about this guy.
It's also interesting how they all say the same thing:

This bastard must be stopped if the gaming industry is to remain intact.

I mean seriously. You made some game 15 years ago, and now you suddenly own the English word, Edge? Jeez, man. Get a life. Maybe if I were to make a game (which I'm in the process of doing), I should call it Edge, but in another language, like Hebrew or Russian.
 

j0z

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,762
0
0
Tim Langdell said:
I've been reading all over the Internet about what you people are saying about me and my company. I've seen death-threats and posting of my personal information on some websites, although this site seems to be obsessed with dealing bodily harm more than anything else. Do you normally post threats and links to personal info on this message board? I got five calls this morning from people saying they are from various websites, and that they are "out to get me."

You are sorely misinformed. But it seems like people are out for blood rather than the truth.

I'll be contacting the administrator of this site to have this insulting content removed.
If you are real, then I am not glad to meet you. Please quietly delete your account and leave. You are not wanted here.

That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it!-j0z