You bought it, you should be able to open it, smash it with a sledge hammer or whatever you like.
Yes, you are buying the console, I exchanged money for an object. I never signed anything that claimed that I did not own it, yet it was put into my possession.SomethingAmazing said:Actually that isn't correct.dathwampeer said:Piracies bad Mmmkay. Even things that aren't piracy but could theoretically be used for piracy... well they're bad too mmmkay.
What Hotz does is perfectly legal. He bought the machine. He can do what he likes with it.
This will just turn out like the jailbreaking iphones case. Hackers win. Because they aren't doing anything wrong.
If not I want off this planet.
When you buy a PS3, you are NOT buying the console. You do not own it, sony does. You buy the permission to use it. And even if that isn't the case, it really should be to give Sony more control over the product and it will help quash piracy.
Haelium said:So people shouldn't be allowed modify cars? Does that include mechanics? And so we should monitor what people do on the internet purely because they might be downloading stuff that they shouldn't?SomethingAmazing said:1. Yes.Haelium said:We could apply that logic of "It allows people to do other stuff" to many other areas. For example: Should we ban people from modifying cars purely because they could plant a bomb in the car and use it for a suicide bomb?icame said:For future reference, I don't like jailbreaking either for what it opens the doors to do.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
Should we ban people from modifying computers because they could be used for illegal stuff?
Should we ban the use of proxies because people could use them to download child pornography and/or copyrighted material?
Should we ban the use of game mods because they could be used to train people to commit massacres?
The list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.
2. No, computers are much different.
3. Yes.
4. No, that's just a stretch.
Homebrew and jailbroke PS3s are more often used for piracy than not. Due to this fact, it is perfectly reasonable for Sony to rule against jailbreaking PS3s.Thats not the point. You were saying "most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player."icame said:MW2 wouldn't be overrun with hackers if they just IP banned them.Haelium said:Thats why MW2 is overrun with hackers right?icame said:the list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
I was disproving that point.
Sounds to me like a contradictory statement.SomethingAmazing said:Actually that isn't correct.dathwampeer said:Piracies bad Mmmkay. Even things that aren't piracy but could theoretically be used for piracy... well they're bad too mmmkay.
What Hotz does is perfectly legal. He bought the machine. He can do what he likes with it.
This will just turn out like the jailbreaking iphones case. Hackers win. Because they aren't doing anything wrong.
If not I want off this planet.
When you buy a PS3, you are NOT buying the console.
icame said:Some hackers screw with multiplayer so therefore most hackers will? Am I missing a step here?Haelium said:So people shouldn't be allowed modify cars? Does that include mechanics? And so we should monitor what people do on the internet purely because they might be downloading stuff that they shouldn't?SomethingAmazing said:1. Yes.Haelium said:We could apply that logic of "It allows people to do other stuff" to many other areas. For example: Should we ban people from modifying cars purely because they could plant a bomb in the car and use it for a suicide bomb?icame said:For future reference, I don't like jailbreaking either for what it opens the doors to do.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
Should we ban people from modifying computers because they could be used for illegal stuff?
Should we ban the use of proxies because people could use them to download child pornography and/or copyrighted material?
Should we ban the use of game mods because they could be used to train people to commit massacres?
The list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.
2. No, computers are much different.
3. Yes.
4. No, that's just a stretch.
Homebrew and jailbroke PS3s are more often used for piracy than not. Due to this fact, it is perfectly reasonable for Sony to rule against jailbreaking PS3s.Thats not the point. You were saying "most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player."icame said:MW2 wouldn't be overrun with hackers if they just IP banned them.Haelium said:Thats why MW2 is overrun with hackers right?icame said:the list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
I was disproving that point.
There are some double standards at work here.Paragon Fury said:That PS3 is theirs though. In most Western, countries, buying a piece of electronic entertainment equipment does not mean you "own" that equipment; it means that you own the privilege to use that equipment. You can do pretty much what you want with it, but if the maker/designer catches you not being above-board with it, they have the reserved right to stop you or take it away.
Thats different from a "PC" or computer, in that no one faction truly "owns" that idea. But Sony wholly owns the idea and product of the Playstation, making it their toy, not yours.
True but, if you read the whole thing, I wasn't the one who brought up cars and suicide bombs as an analogy in the first place.dathwampeer said:That's to do with them no longer fitting in with the safety regulations. If it's a public safety issue then I think logic is on their side. You'd probably have a hard case arguing that a hacked PS3 is a public safety hazard.thepyrethatburns said:As a sidenote,
The example is inaccurate because you can modify your cars all you want. You just may not be able to use public roads if you modify them too far. It is illegal (in the U.S. anyway) to drive a Demolition Derby car or a Monster Truck on public roads. When Sony removed Other OS, it was pointed out numerous times that you can still use the PS3. You just won't be able to use the network. You could also argue that you also couldn't play newer games as a lot of them have security updates but that's the risk you take when modifying things for Homebrew.Haelium said:We could apply that logic of "It allows people to do other stuff" to many other areas. For example: Should we ban people from modifying cars purely because they could plant a bomb in the car and use it for a suicide bomb?
And, since we're on the subject of cars and suicide bombs, if someone did modify a car to be a suicide bomb then drove it into Times Square and let it go off, would you consider a defense of "I was just doing security research on the car" to be a valid defense?
As for your last analogy. Again. There is a massive difference between someone suicide bombing and someone hacking a machine.
Haelium said:You know what the word OVERRUN means right? An Activision employee said (Out of context mind you) that they might shut down the PS3 servers because its getting so bad. That means there's a hell of a lot of them. That means it probobly a huge chunk of the hackers that are doing it.icame said:Some hackers screw with multiplayer so therefore most hackers will? Am I missing a step here?Haelium said:So people shouldn't be allowed modify cars? Does that include mechanics? And so we should monitor what people do on the internet purely because they might be downloading stuff that they shouldn't?SomethingAmazing said:1. Yes.Haelium said:We could apply that logic of "It allows people to do other stuff" to many other areas. For example: Should we ban people from modifying cars purely because they could plant a bomb in the car and use it for a suicide bomb?icame said:For future reference, I don't like jailbreaking either for what it opens the doors to do.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
Should we ban people from modifying computers because they could be used for illegal stuff?
Should we ban the use of proxies because people could use them to download child pornography and/or copyrighted material?
Should we ban the use of game mods because they could be used to train people to commit massacres?
The list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.
2. No, computers are much different.
3. Yes.
4. No, that's just a stretch.
Homebrew and jailbroke PS3s are more often used for piracy than not. Due to this fact, it is perfectly reasonable for Sony to rule against jailbreaking PS3s.Thats not the point. You were saying "most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player."icame said:MW2 wouldn't be overrun with hackers if they just IP banned them.Haelium said:Thats why MW2 is overrun with hackers right?icame said:the list goes on, most people will only hack the PS3 so that they can mess around with their own mods in single player.Numachuka said:It wasn't about piracy. It was about the act of jailbreaking the PS3. Downloading games is still illegal.icame said:Oh do telltheriddlen said:You just don't get it do you?icame said:Screw off EFF. I like my developers having money.
I was disproving that point.
REAAAAAALLLLY. So if I want to replace the brakes on my car, and install a new air intake to improve gas mileage without spending $400 I should be thrown in jail? Clearly you are a broken human being.SomethingAmazing said:Yes. But that brings up a really good idea, all mechanics must be certified to work on cars. And modification without certification is illegal.Haelium said:So people shouldn't be allowed modify cars? Does that include mechanics? And so we should monitor what people do on the internet purely because they might be downloading stuff that they shouldn't?
Yes.
Piracy is a huge problem. And while we're at it, we can do other things with the monitoring. Like stopping crimes before they happen. That sort of thing.
Again, huge number of hackers online somehow = most hackers? Most people in prison are weirdos, but that doesn't mean that most weirdos are in prison. Do you get me?icame said:snip
Prison is a horrible comparison. It is an extremely isolated part of society. Multiplayer games are a huge part of gaming now. With games like wow and cod, multiplayer is arguably bigger then single player nowadays for most gamers.Haelium said:Again, huge number of hackers online somehow = most hackers? Most people in prison are weirdos, but that doesn't mean that most weirdos are in prison. Do you get me?icame said:snip
The comparison doesn't matter, I can apply it to other areas.icame said:Prison is a horrible comparison. It is an extremely isolated part of society. Multiplayer games are a huge part of gaming now. With games like wow and cod, multiplayer is arguably bigger then single player nowadays for most gamers.Haelium said:Again, huge number of hackers online somehow = most hackers? Most people in prison are weirdos, but that doesn't mean that most weirdos are in prison. Do you get me?icame said:snip
Source please.icame said:You know what the word OVERRUN means right? An Activision employee said (Out of context mind you) that they might shut down the PS3 servers because its getting so bad. That means there's a hell of a lot of them. That means it probobly a huge chunk of the hackers that are doing it.
...When you buy a PS3 you ARE buying the console, you do own it. Just like other bits of computer/console hardware.SomethingAmazing said:Actually that isn't correct.dathwampeer said:Piracies bad Mmmkay. Even things that aren't piracy but could theoretically be used for piracy... well they're bad too mmmkay.
What Hotz does is perfectly legal. He bought the machine. He can do what he likes with it.
This will just turn out like the jailbreaking iphones case. Hackers win. Because they aren't doing anything wrong.
If not I want off this planet.
When you buy a PS3, you are NOT buying the console. You do not own it, sony does.