YesRJ 17 said:Which is why I'm asking if ionized hydrogen ever loses it's chargeGundam GP01 said:Okay, I actually read the article now.RJ 17 said:Does ionized hydrogen ever "un-ionize"? Honestly I don't know so feel free to correct me with actual Science if you can. But if it retains it's charge then then we could be looking at some very old ionized hydrogen.Gundam GP01 said:Uh, wouldnt the star stop making ultra-violet light when it dies? And even if it's the leftover gas and dust from after it died that's making the UV light, we should still be able to see it.RJ 17 said:It's the Reapers, they're going around gobbling up stars to charge their power cells!
Seriously though...the only thing I can think of is a stupidly obvious theory that I'd imagine the scientists have already dismissed: light sources burn out. They said they noticed the trend in our area, but not in "younger" areas of the universe? That implies that our area is "older", and as such would have "older" stars...which in turn increases the likelihood of said stars burning out.
I'm, of course, no astro-physicist and have absolutely no scientific background or evidence to base this theory upon, but that simple explanation makes sense to me. :3
They seem to be saying that when hydrogen atoms are struck by ultraviolet light, they turn from electrically neutral atoms to charged ions.
The problem is that they're seeing way too much hydrogen ions and way to few UV light sources to account for the hydrogen ions.
So we are looking at ionized hydrogen. but that doesnt solve the problem because ionized hydrogen cant ionize non ionized hydrogen.
plasma balls/Northen Lights are basically the same thing, it just takes longer because there is a lack of stuff to pawn energy off on to, so it has to radiate out.
When it loses enough energy(~1kev) it will stop being ionized.