LOL, literally! It's funny because it's true. Plus it would have Megan Fox in it but how they'd be able to find an excuse for a Victorian era character to show us her t*ts would be a stretch.KazNecro said:The only thing that could have made the movie worse would have been if Michael Bay was directing it.
Seconded.Anacortian said:And Moviebob, Branagh's Hamlet was great because it was unabridged.
I dont consider throwing an american into a lead role of an english story an 'adaptation' Scrooged is an adaptation and it worked becaus the story was applied to modern day new yourk and turned into a half decent black comedy. Setting the film where its meant to be set london/sherwood forest whatever but casting an american to boost the US appeal feels like butchering the Original. I agree that teh language should be somewhat adapted to the modern audience but at least keep it in the same country!Anacortian said:If one's biggest problem with foreign adaptations on one's culture's stories is the accent, one needs to apply some reason. First, foreign adaptation is just about the highest form of praise one can give a culture; parroting accents comes dangerously close to an insult regardless of how well it's done and with what sincerity. Second, Victorian English (Dickens), Middle English (Robin Hood and Shakespeare), and Old or not even English (Arther) sound regressively less like modern, true English (what they speak in London). Nobody is ever going to get the accent right, neither you nor me. Repeat after me: "Thank you for the presumed compliment of my culture."
And Moviebob, Branagh's Hamlet was great because it was unabridged.
Indeed it is. Ever since Fly Me to the Moon, 3D has been the flavor of the month for animated movies, just like how vampires have been the flavor of the month for books and TV shows ever since Twilight.Distorted Stu said:I never really liked th sotry int he first place. I wish movies would stop being in 3D. Its ruining cinema with a cheap gimmick
It was still around, but at the moment everyone wants a piece of it. Even TV, Channel 4 in the UK are having a 3D week of programs and I know the series Chuck had a random 3D episode. Why? At least games dropped the '3D' bit a long time ago...Izzil said:My assumptions that the whole resurgence of 3D is just a gimmick to keep the cinemas economically afloat a little longer have never seemed more justified. Granted, I don't think there was a time when 3D glasses weren't a gimmick at the heart of the operation, but now it's just getting more and more clear (then again, the re-release of Nightmare Before Christmas in 3D a few years back should have made that abundantly obvious to anyone with half a brain).