I was wondering that too.Sidney Buit said:When I saw this review I thought the same thing as when I saw the trailer.
Why was the option: release or kill? What happened to the third, and IMO obviously superior "keep em tied up till the operation was complete or extraction accomplished" option?
I mean, I get that the survivor told his story with the moral debate, so that's what happened, but... I dunno, it still came to my mind that they missed out on a much better option.
If they were terrorist sympathisers then they can just slow them down completely and the Seals don't gain anything for it. If they were innocent then it would essentially be kidnapping.Sidney Buit said:When I saw this review I thought the same thing as when I saw the trailer.
Why was the option: release or kill? What happened to the third, and IMO obviously superior "keep em tied up till the operation was complete or extraction accomplished" option?
I mean, I get that the survivor told his story with the moral debate, so that's what happened, but... I dunno, it still came to my mind that they missed out on a much better option.
What would have happened if Zod had Kryptoformed Mars instead?Sidney Buit said:When I saw this review I thought the same thing as when I saw the trailer.
Why was the option: release or kill? What happened to the third, and IMO obviously superior "keep em tied up till the operation was complete or extraction accomplished" option?
I mean, I get that the survivor told his story with the moral debate, so that's what happened, but... I dunno, it still came to my mind that they missed out on a much better option.
I think his point is that war-porn without an underlying pathos is just gratuitous.Moth_Monk said:So Bob didn't like it because the film didn't romanticize the reality of war; he prefers to watch a comforting lie at the movies? lol
it's addressed in the movieSidney Buit said:When I saw this review I thought the same thing as when I saw the trailer.
Why was the option: release or kill? What happened to the third, and IMO obviously superior "keep em tied up till the operation was complete or extraction accomplished" option?
I mean, I get that the survivor told his story with the moral debate, so that's what happened, but... I dunno, it still came to my mind that they missed out on a much better option.
Important to note that once you capture someone you are responsible for their safety - leaving the people tied up to die is almost as bad as killing them yourself.Enosh_ said:it's addressed in the movie
- they are found and warn the taliban
- they are not found and:
-are killed by the wildlife (they mention wolves to be specific)
-die due to exposure, night time in Afghanistan in the mountains not being exactly the best time to be tied to a tree