Escape to the Movies: Mockingjay, Part 1 - Best One Yet (Although A Little Thin)

MovieBob

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11,495
0
0
Mockingjay, Part 1 - Best One Yet (Although A Little Thin)

MovieBob isn't quite sure why they needed to split this movie into two parts, but is totally ready for the second half.

Watch Video
 

hawk533

New member
Dec 17, 2009
143
0
0
Wait, did Bob say that the first movie was made weaker by removing the "vital interior monologue"? That monologue was the worst part of the books. Suzanne Collins is not a good writer and her over-reliance on interior monologue made the books difficult to read for me. I thought the first movie was significantly improved by actually showing us what characters were thinking through their actions.

Having said that, I'm sure the third movie is stretched thin by splitting up the last book. But I still planning on seeing it because I've read the books.
 

vid87

New member
May 17, 2010
737
0
0
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
I don't understand how a live-action Cinderella is relevant in this day and age anymore.

I'm pretty sure that even decons and even decon-recons of that particular story are so over-done that it's pointless.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,257
0
0
I'm still quite disappointed that they haven't tried to pull a Maleficent on Cinderella.

As for this film, I might watch it when it's on DVD, I still need to watch Catching Fire as I'm still a bit annoyed by the crappy second half of the first film. I liked the call back to a previous video with the held-at-gunpoint joke, I guess I should go look for said episode.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
I don't know about a lot of this. Catnap is basically Bella with "my dad is so lame" replaced by a generic contrariness. She's a cardboard cutout, a figurehead of a series about becoming a figurehead, except she never truly grows into what could be a brilliant metaphor. Lawrence seems to have captured this with her onscreen portrayal of a gender-swapped Keannu Reeves, to the point where the best parts of the movies tend to be the supporting cast.

And there's a Sam Raimi's Spider-Man parallel in there somewhere.

But the review made me laugh.

hawk533 said:
Wait, did Bob say that the first movie was made weaker by removing the "vital interior monologue"? That monologue was the worst part of the books. Suzanne Collins is not a good writer and her over-reliance on interior monologue made the books difficult to read for me. I thought the first movie was significantly improved by actually showing us what characters were thinking through their actions.
They don't, though. They leave out a lot of the context. And while Collins' purple prose isn't necessary, a good chunk of the motives are lost. Assuming you don't infer it based on a previous reading, I guess.

vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
She's the Girl on Fire. Obviously, she's just using her mutant abilities.
 

RiffRaff

New member
May 5, 2009
70
0
0
Being a father to 2 young girls I read through the Hunger Games books hoping to give them (in a few years) a set of good books they could read through for that strong female role.

I was so disappointed.

Not because the writing isn't great (it's not, but serviceable), but because Katniss is not the strong female role model that I was hoping for.

She is used by everyone around her and she is oblivious to most of it. Every time she ever finds herself in just a little bit of trouble a MALE character comes to her rescue: Gale, Peeta, Haythorn, Cinna. Every dang time! Sure she is certainly capable with a bow and arrow, but other than that it's MALE rescuing the Princess with a Bow.

Is it just me?
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,721
0
0
Hunger Games isn't my thing, sad to say, so I won't be partaking. Glad some are getting enjoyment out of it, though, so enjoy it, folks.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat šŸ
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 26, 2020
7,132
71
53
Country
šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§
Gender
ā™‚
hawk533 said:
Wait, did Bob say that the first movie was made weaker by removing the "vital interior monologue"? That monologue was the worst part of the books. Suzanne Collins is not a good writer and her over-reliance on interior monologue made the books difficult to read for me. I thought the first movie was significantly improved by actually showing us what characters were thinking through their actions.

Having said that, I'm sure the third movie is stretched thin by splitting up the last book. But I still planning on seeing it because I've read the books.
I guess your mileage may vary on this because I thought the interior monologue was one of the best parts of the books, I enjoyed the in depth perspective of the character's thoughts and motives it gave and felt the movie lacked something because of it's absence. Suppose it depends on what you're looking for.
 

Falseprophet

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,381
0
0
RiffRaff said:
Is it just me?
No, because Katniss isn't the Chosen One of a Campellian Hero's Journey. She's a survivor trying to keep herself and her family alive in the face of social forces that want to break her, kill her, own her, or use her to their own ends. This trilogy is more like The Long Walk or All Quiet On the Western Front than Star Wars.

For your purposes, I'd recommend taking a look at books by Tamora Pierce or Patricia C. Wrede. Kristin Cashore's Graceling books and Sarah J. Maas' Throne of Glass series might also be what you're looking for.
 

HaileStorm

New member
Apr 15, 2014
35
0
0
vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
If I remember correctly from when I read the books, it's some sort of bomb arrow like in Twilight Princess. So yeah an arrow with an explosive tip. It's futuristic and all that cool jazz.

edit: I can't spell for shit
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
HaileStorm said:
vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
If I remember correctly from when I read the books, it's some sort of bomb arrow like in Twilight Princess. So yeah an arrow with an explosive tip. It's futuristic and all that cool jazz.

edit: I can't spell for shit
Ignoring the highly improbable nature of hitting the UaV/Aircraft in the first place an object the size of an arrow could cause havoc if it got into the engine intake, if its some futuristic thing thats heavily reliant on vectored thrust it could even bring it down.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
And when this is over I wonder what the next YA Novel they'll try to prop up as the next big thing. Though considering how there isn't any series that is a craze book wise like a lot of other ones have been, methinks Hollywood is going to be scraping the barrel.
 

JennAnge

New member
May 15, 2012
86
0
0
Falseprophet said:
RiffRaff said:
Is it just me?
No, because Katniss isn't the Chosen One of a Campellian Hero's Journey. She's a survivor trying to keep herself and her family alive in the face of social forces that want to break her, kill her, own her, or use her to their own ends. This trilogy is more like The Long Walk or All Quiet On the Western Front than Star Wars.

For your purposes, I'd recommend taking a look at books by Tamora Pierce or Patricia C. Wrede. Kristin Cashore's Graceling books and Sarah J. Maas' Throne of Glass series might also be what you're looking for.
Awesome list, thanks! As the mom of a growing daugther, I want to seed her equally growing library with positive role models - as well as sci-fi and fantasy, because if I have to read one more Heartland horsie novel I am going to go French Cuisine on some unlucky equine's ass. But the books I've read through so far make me want to cry...The Wrede novels look particularly interesting because the first set of the Dragon ones seem to be largely boyfriend free. I have nothing against her reading the gooey stuff too, but I'd like at least a few books to pass the literary equivalent of a Bechdel test. If she don't like 'em, that's fine, but at least she'll hopefully realize that being boy-obssessed in your teens is one choice among others rather than a prerequisite of her gender.

OT: Been meaning to watch the Hunger Games series at some point - tried getting into the novels but the writing, oy... With Bob's review in hand, I think I might wait for the final movie to be out so I can watch the series, and particularly the last movies, as an ensemble.
 

WarpedLord

New member
Mar 11, 2009
135
0
0
Sigmund Av Volsung said:
I don't understand how a live-action Cinderella is relevant in this day and age anymore.

I'm pretty sure that even decons and even decon-recons of that particular story are so over-done that it's pointless.
Because there are always young children around, so there will always be an audience for the classic fairytales, and new retellings of those stories are welcome for those of us that have heard/watched the stories a million times.

Besides, it's a great director with a strong cast.
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
WarpedLord said:
Sigmund Av Volsung said:
I don't understand how a live-action Cinderella is relevant in this day and age anymore.

I'm pretty sure that even decons and even decon-recons of that particular story are so over-done that it's pointless.
Because there are always young children around, so there will always be an audience for the classic fairytales, and new retellings of those stories are welcome for those of us that have heard/watched the stories a million times.

Besides, it's a great director with a strong cast.
But said stories are so ingrained into popular culture that making a movie based on it is redundant. I mean, it looks exactly the same as the animated movie, just in live action. I don't see how good direction or acting can do anything to assist it.

Why not just make more new movies revolving around new fairytales? As for fans of the original, you could always just watch the original.

Disney baffles me sometimes.
 

DaWaffledude

New member
Apr 23, 2011
628
0
0
vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
Yes, it did.

It's part of the whole "turning Katniss into a PR symbol thing". Katniss with a bow and arrow feels more "Katniss"-y to the public than Katniss with a machine gun. So they gave her a bow and a bunch of high-tech arrows (think Hawkeye) to make her seem more unique and impressive. Everyone else is using guns.

To answer your question about their tech, the revolution is mostly led by District 13, who've been in a nuclear stalemate with the Capital since the last rebellion. Their tech has stayed on-par with the Capitol's.
 

vid87

New member
May 17, 2010
737
0
0
DaWaffledude said:
vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
Yes, it did.

It's part of the whole "turning Katniss into a PR symbol thing". Katniss with a bow and arrow feels more "Katniss"-y to the public than Katniss with a machine gun. So they gave her a bow and a bunch of high-tech arrows (think Hawkeye) to make her seem more unique and impressive. Everyone else is using guns.

To answer your question about their tech, the revolution is mostly led by District 13, who've been in a nuclear stalemate with the Capital since the last rebellion. Their tech has stayed on-par with the Capitol's.
I'm hoping based on what Bob mentioned that the story goes out of it's way to point out that that's a tad ridiculous: it'd be like giving modern soldiers colonial-era clothes and muskets because that's symbolic of US military heritage.

And I definitely though Hawkeye, not even because of weaponry, but, had they not been bomb-arrows, she would need hyper senses to bullseye the precise targets required to disable high-tech vehicles in one shot (the guy did hit a usb port from like 100 feet away).
 

TKretts3

New member
Jul 20, 2010
432
0
0
Remember when Bob mispronouncing Katniss' name was funny? I don't. Third time isn't always the charm.

As for the actual movie, I hope it's good, and the new direction that Bob describes it taking definitely sounds interesting, but I'll be waiting until it gets to DVD. I've already got my ticket for Corner Gas: The Movie (Which I doubt will get a review here, though it would be interesting to see Bob review a wholly Canadian movie) on the 5th, and seeing two movies in two weeks just feels weird. Dunno why...
 

Sidmen

New member
Jul 3, 2012
180
0
0
J Tyran said:
HaileStorm said:
vid87 said:
I would at least like to know how they've apparently scrapped together decent weaponry to fight a high-tech martial state. I mean, did she just blow up an air drone with a bow and arrow? Did it at least have a bomb strapped to it or something?
If I remember correctly from when I read the books, it's some sort of bomb arrow like in Twilight Princess. So yeah an arrow with an explosive tip. It's futuristic and all that cool jazz.

edit: I can't spell for shit
Ignoring the highly improbable nature of hitting the UaV/Aircraft in the first place an object the size of an arrow could cause havoc if it got into the engine intake, if its some futuristic thing thats heavily reliant on vectored thrust it could even bring it down.
From my understanding of such things (that is, roughly 30 minutes of trying to find pictures of those aircraft cuz I liked the look of em, and trawling through the places they could be found...

They aren't drones nor are they fighter aircraft. They're Hovercraft that are both larger and slower than any comparison we're making. Apparently, they're also not very well armored and rather unstable once you disrupt their engines. Still badass looking tho.