Stickfigure said:
Well you say personal experiences, but what do you mean by that? This is a genuine question because don't the personal experiences of Bosnian refugees count?
I believe that the when we are discussing the merit of a decade we should not be restricted to pop-culture, despite being on a site dedicated to pop-culture. Why are you so against broadening our argument?
Ethnocentricty, despite the name is a term often used when one places great importance on one cultural group, rather than ethnic group. For instance, a study where all participants are American can be described as ethnocentric.
Lastly, I apologise fro replying to your comment in the first place. It was me venting my frustration at people constantly praising the 90s as the best decade ever. It was misdirected and I apologise.
I apologize myself for calling you a "half-wit." I was taken aback by the seriousness of the response and felt justified in defending my point. That does not, however, require name-calling. You clearly at least possess good cause for pursuing your argument, and the wherewithal to support it, however much I disagree with its propriety in this situation.
Ethnocentricity is a very widely misapplied term, the like of which has only been matched by "hacker." I suppose given its commonality now, even its greater use in scientific terms, I'm being more pedantic than anything else. It probably is only months away from it in the OED, but I still get all sensitive on what I still consider its misuse. I get the same way when people speak in the third person about an unnamed subject and use "they" instead of "he/she." Conversationally it's... acceptable to me, but it's still not right. Yet, anyway. It wasn't the main point of my multi-point argument, but I stand by it all the same.
I am against the broadening of the argument by virtue of the fact that it brings needless complications to a simple subject. In terms of media and entertainment, I feel the 90s was pretty good. Damned good, in fact. I by no means think it's perfect, and cannot argue so, but it wasn't a bad decade, and provably did not "suck," a sentiment MovieBob has issued many a time.
As far as personal experiences; if someone from Bosnia does interject, I will accept his views on pop culture and media as much as anyone else's. Hell, let them discuss ethnic cleansing if they so choose, I won't stop them. However, I think the limited scope of the initial argument allows the points to be more easily covered. No single decade was "better" or "worse" than any other, overall. But in limited sets we can at least discuss the finer points of quality.
(P.S. Yes, I am aware of the hypocrisy of my grammar errors and railing against the debateably more acceptable misuse of the word "ethnocentric." English/Greek lit majors are weird that way.)