Escape to the Movies: The Thing

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
188 days I will spend dreading due to low expectations from Marvel's hubris. 30 (and 37) days I will spend in anticipation due to high expectations that will be met.

Anyway, this almost makes me angry due to The Thing being one of my favorite horror films EVER. It holds up incredibly well to this day.
 

Shiftygiant

New member
Apr 12, 2011
433
0
0
Anyone know where to get 'The thing from another world'? I've looked everywhere for a copy
 

guise709

New member
Feb 2, 2010
118
0
0
Oh that sucked the trailers made it look pretty good but then again tahts what trailers are for. Your right with the animatronics thing they don't make films like they use to. I remember scenes like The Road Warrior where they used actual cars crashing into other cars to get the effects and those scenes is still one of the best car chase scenes in film right now. Sucks to see it happen but business is business and time is money.
 

MaraJade03

New member
Jan 14, 2010
91
0
0
I am actually more interested in seeing what Bob thought the Avengers trailers. Only 188 days? I think i can wait that long just need to survie xmas.
 

therockdemon

New member
Mar 17, 2011
136
0
0
i knew bob was going to put the avengers tralier in there somewhere, also i just got a copy of the thing (the 1982 version) and i cant wait to see it
 

mikey7339

New member
Jun 15, 2011
696
0
0
I just realized my dog looks really similar to the one they find at the beginning of the John Carpenter one. >.>

And without Kurt Russell or Wilford Brimley, there was no way this could have been anywhere near as good as the previous film.
 

ChildofGallifrey

New member
May 26, 2008
1,095
0
0
Now I'm confused. A friend of mine, who is a filmmaking student, said it was f'ing awesome. I tend to agree with Bob almost every time though, so I'm going to pass on this one.
 

Sould1n

New member
Jan 23, 2011
218
0
0
I say brilliant review MovieBob. Sure, I had no interest in the movie (not my kind of movie) but it was nice to hear a well paced in-depth reasoning as why not to watch it.

Also, when you started playing the Avengers trailer I was actually fooled for a moment into thinking you had finished the review there and then and was actually going to simply play Avenger footage for the rest. Should of realised this was not the case when the footage began about mid way through the trailer.

The review was in-depth and funny so once again, brilliant review.
 

1nfinite_Cros5

New member
Mar 31, 2010
249
0
0
For a second there, I actually thought you were going to roll the Avengers trailer for the rest of the video.
 

Stall

New member
Apr 16, 2011
950
0
0
Carpenter's The Thing really doesn't really rank up there for "memorable character". And if you didn't know Wilford Brimley was going to be the "face on the final boss fight," then you need to have your brain checked. Carpenter's The Thing is not really "classical" material: it's a cult film. Last time I checked, those two concepts are radically different.

So I fail to see how you can complain about these things int he remake if not even the original got them right, unless you are so blinded by nostalgia, and bitterly cynical about Hollywood to the point where it obscures your obligations as a critic.

Oh wait, this is MovieBob we're talking about. Of COURSE he can't do a proper job because he's too blinded by nostalgia and bitterly cynical about Hollywood! Silly me... expecting a critic to actually be critical instead of just complaining about how it's Hollywood being Hollywood and that it's not original!

Once again, MovieBob really cements himself as being one of the worst contributors on this site.
 

necromanzer52

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,464
0
0
The thing, being my favorite horror movie of all time, I was really hoping this would be good. Oh well.
 

TokenRupee

New member
Oct 2, 2010
126
0
0
MatParker116 said:
A similar reason is why Sean Bean ended up in the Silent Hill film.
Because his parts were the only well-acted or good bits in the movie?

I may see this. Didn't think it would be as good as The Thing to begin with.
 

MANIFESTER

New member
Sep 14, 2009
64
0
0
Stall said:
Carpenter's The Thing really doesn't really rank up there for "memorable character". And if you didn't know Wilford Brimley was going to be the "face on the final boss fight," then you need to have your brain checked.

So I fail to see how you can complain about these things int he remake if not even the original got them right, unless you are so blinded by nostalgia, and bitterly cynical about Hollywood to the point where it obscures your obligations as a critic.

Oh wait, this is MovieBob we're talking about. Of COURSE he can't do a proper job because he's too blinded by nostalgia and bitterly cynical about Hollywood! Silly me... expecting a critic to actually be critical instead of just complaining about how it's Hollywood being Hollywood and that it's not original!

Once again, MovieBob really cements himself as being one of the worst contributors on this site.

Now perhaps I am forgetting the finer details of the review, but I do not recall MovieBob stating Carpenter's The Thing didn't have those petty things you mentioned. I think he only complimented it for the special effects, being well directed, and by inference not being boring. Which I can actually agree. Now I would agree that the characters in Carpenter's Thing didn't have the best characters, but I was at least engaged in it enough that I could remember them. But to each his own I guess.
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
i find it funny that hollywood exec. people would actually think a prequel would be better than a remake. I think the only thing getting more shafted and hated on than remakes are prequels (three in particular). There's just alot more remake material to sling mud at.