I have to concur. I'm pretty sure I've head this verbatim about a year ago. It wasn't a bad episode, just... I've heard it before... from you... thus it takes from it a little.Hungry Donner said:It's not a bad episode, but it's something that you've talked about before. I would have rather seen a movie you missed before reviewed - perhaps something that was recently released on DVD, although a classic would work too.
He could just have done what reviewers/critics usually do when they've got no material... done a retro review. Something that a lot of people might've messaged him about and wanted to hear his opinion on.Twilight_guy said:Basically "well I have no material, time to talk about nothing for 5 minutes! WEEEEEEEE!"
I know that due to circumstance you might not have material for a week but you don't you have a backlog of old ideas or maybe stuff you didn't cover. Gotta have a plan B.
Your opinion, however, I don't really mind the changes. Their minor, ignorable and are usually blown WAY outta proportion.The_root_of_all_evil said:Urh said:
I am altering the film. Pray I don't alter it any further
I agree with this. When you don't have something new to review, please give us your thoughts on some catalogue titles. That would be more entertaining (and topical) than this.Hungry Donner said:It's not a bad episode, but it's something that you've talked about before. I would have rather seen a movie you missed before reviewed - perhaps something that was recently released on DVD, although a classic would work too.
How cute....Bob thinks he's part of the majority.Srdjan Tanaskovic said:"GI Joe didn't get a lot of bad reviews"
really? Because rotten tomatoes says otherwise