I agree with you 100%. Commercial viability does not necessarily translate to critical viability (see: just about every foreign film released in the US).emeraldrafael said:I dont have so much issue with that. You cant really tell whats good and what isnt in a movie through monetary support. As long as (if) this grows to be a series, I just dont want to to grow stale and diluted, turning from tech and little inside nerd jokes (that really arent that bad and you can learn about in five minutes of a computers class), to some mediocre run of the mill action flick that only has the resemblance to the Tron culture and original by its name. If that makes any sense.
I guess to sum that up, i just dont want this to be a hit and watch it go south fast to appease and appeal the general movie going audience.
Oh, I see. Well, it's a fine balancing act, to be honest. On one hand, a franchise will not be continued in the absence of monetary support. In other words, a studio, even one as big as Disney, is not going to promote something that is a flop (in financial terms). However, as you point out, the makers of a franchise may misinterpret success as a call for them to appeal to a wider audience, which essentially amounts to a big "fuck you" as it concerns the original fans. I think a good example of this is Mass Effect. While I thoroughly enjoy both installments, numerous people have complained that as a result of the first one being successful, Bioware decided to dumb the second one down to appeal to a wider audience.
Let's just hope that Tron doesn't go the way of Pirates of the Caribbean <__<