I feel sad at your ignorance and your petty spirits.
Most of your observations are juvenile attacks against straw men.
While you say that people should put more thought into their comments than "dicknose", you mindlessly attack "old white men". This is made more pathetic when one recalls that in the film the character said "big nose". Why did your mind substitute a phallic association where it did not exist?
It feels absurd to ask you simply to be smarter and more thoughtful and more generous of spirit. It feels absurd to ask you to approach Oldman's comments with acknowledgement that he did indeed say things that were true about "PC" speech codes -- codes which your own reactions attempt to enforce. But you could at least approach the subject with the awareness that he was speaking, not writing and that his comments were being made to an interviewer as part of many hours of conversation that are not represented in the interview text. Perhaps he felt he was speaking off-the-record in that moment or that the interviewer would not use those statements because they were (as spoken) extreme examples drawn into an ad hoc argument and not carefully chosen and planned statements.
It would be nonsense to say that a man's acting career should excuse his personal beliefs. But Oldman was not talking about his own beliefs; he was talking about what people are able to get away with saying, and the fact that some people are permitted to say, with apparent sincerity, things that other people cannot. This is not simply a matter of "you can mock your own kind" -- a rule which is as worthless as it is idiotic, as any biracial or bisexual person knows. Oldman is pointing out that some people are permitted, generally because of their political affiliations, to say things that would get other people fired or boycotted.
If a "conservative" has an affair, then he's a liar and a cheat, because people hold him accountable for violating his wedding vows. Yet when a "liberal" does it, everyone knows they didn't take the vows seriously and so it's okay. It's a game of expectations and double-standards. It's not really wrong -- it serves a social purpose -- but Oldman doesn't like it and a lot of people don't like it -- especially people on the side that is held to the "higher standard". It feels unfair. It's not, because they have the benefit of being on the side that everyone knows is held to a higher standard, even though people won't talk about that. (In other words, when really bad things happen, people look to the "conservatives", police and so forth to re-establish order. Which isn't ideal, but it's how things work.)
Anyway, just stop being so petty.
