This pisses me off.
It pissed me off when the US PSAs came out associating marijuana with automobile collisions and unwanted pregnancies in the early 2000s. I don't smoke weed, but I've seen life and limb lost to alcohol, moving vehicles and poor judgement under the influence. That's where the PSAs should be directed.
This new anti-piracy video pisses me off for the same reason.
Its premise is untrue. Not a single project has been cancelled due to the profit margin getting undercut specifically by media piracy. Not a single person has been fired due to someone downloading movies, or music, or software for free.
With no stats, this commercial is bullshit. And PSAs based on bullshit contraindicate a valid point (whether or not there is one).
Regarding piracy, itself, I've explained my position plenty of times elsewhere on The Escapist. In short, there are no good guys nor bad guys. Given how often consumers are expected to repurchase a favorite movie, every time it comes out on new media we're expected to buy it again[footnote]Will you buy Star Wars on Blu Ray? On 3D? The 40th Anniversary Edition in 2017?[/footnote] and given that music licenses expire whenever companies feel like it (say, when they change their DRM), requiring consumers to re-purchase their music? Is this right?
On the other hand, when my CD of Yes 90125 wears out, and I download the .mp3s, is that piracy? According to the RIAA, it should be, despite my valid license. I play Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle Earth (I), but my DVDs are lost in my room somewhere. Is it piracy if I download it to install it on my laptop? According to ICE, it is. I owned the VCR for Ghostbusters and then the DVD. Should I be required to re-purchases it again on Blu-Ray, or are my two previously-obtained licenses for it valid? According to the MPAA, they are not.
There are ways companies can make the digital age work for them. Closing down download sites or (as is equally often happening) torrent indexes, is not the way to do it.
238U
It pissed me off when the US PSAs came out associating marijuana with automobile collisions and unwanted pregnancies in the early 2000s. I don't smoke weed, but I've seen life and limb lost to alcohol, moving vehicles and poor judgement under the influence. That's where the PSAs should be directed.
This new anti-piracy video pisses me off for the same reason.
Its premise is untrue. Not a single project has been cancelled due to the profit margin getting undercut specifically by media piracy. Not a single person has been fired due to someone downloading movies, or music, or software for free.
With no stats, this commercial is bullshit. And PSAs based on bullshit contraindicate a valid point (whether or not there is one).
Regarding piracy, itself, I've explained my position plenty of times elsewhere on The Escapist. In short, there are no good guys nor bad guys. Given how often consumers are expected to repurchase a favorite movie, every time it comes out on new media we're expected to buy it again[footnote]Will you buy Star Wars on Blu Ray? On 3D? The 40th Anniversary Edition in 2017?[/footnote] and given that music licenses expire whenever companies feel like it (say, when they change their DRM), requiring consumers to re-purchase their music? Is this right?
On the other hand, when my CD of Yes 90125 wears out, and I download the .mp3s, is that piracy? According to the RIAA, it should be, despite my valid license. I play Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle Earth (I), but my DVDs are lost in my room somewhere. Is it piracy if I download it to install it on my laptop? According to ICE, it is. I owned the VCR for Ghostbusters and then the DVD. Should I be required to re-purchases it again on Blu-Ray, or are my two previously-obtained licenses for it valid? According to the MPAA, they are not.
There are ways companies can make the digital age work for them. Closing down download sites or (as is equally often happening) torrent indexes, is not the way to do it.
238U