Is on the Gin
- May 26, 2020
Seems more like an issue of you projecting your beliefs onto me again and trying to once again tell me what I believe or intended.If somebody says, "Oh, so you're fine with [killing people/ eating babies/ bombing puppies], are you?!?", nobody in their right mind would conclude that it's a question asked in good faith, rather than an obviously hostile accusation.
The idea that it was a question asked in good faith is so laughable, it's almost like something from a Mitchell and Webb sketch.
In short: I didn't tell you your intent. You made your intent blindingly obvious when you started throwing shit at people.
Bit of a habit you seem to have of doing that, should I leave you and the Strawman you seem to want to argue with alone for a while?
Mental or physical damage that requires time or effort to heal beyond a simple hurt feeling.Pray tell, what specific wrongdoing does the term "harmful" indicate?
Is it assault? Battery? Murder? Stalking? Those are all demonstrable terms. Which is it?
They brought up criticism in response to people saying cancel culture is bad and specifically in this context death threats, abuse and libel.Someone explicitly condones criticism, and never mentions abuse or harassment.
You accuse them directly of condoning abuse and harassment.
"Except I very clearly wasn't" is just the nineteenth empty denial to plop onto the pile, as if it's worth anything at all.
As I said either conflation or deflection.
Which BTW picking deflection would mean no they didn't believe it they just like the present outcome and didn't want to acknowledge the way said result happened.