Gold and Silver were best in series in my opinion.RogueRunner said:same with all Pokemon games that came after Red and Blue version.
I beleive Street Fighter 4 was awful.
Gold and Silver were best in series in my opinion.RogueRunner said:same with all Pokemon games that came after Red and Blue version.
Really? I found the second one pretty much better than the first, apart from the whole revist thing.Kuchinawa212 said:Hmm...
I hear Tales of Symphonia 2 was bad.
Not too bad
just bad
That was less than coherent. What I've gathered from that was you not liking the lack of story in the old GTA games, which says to me you've completely missed the point. You are a gangster, and oldschool mafia style urban warrior taking over the streets, why does everything need a story now?alex134219 said:uh no they wasn't any story except get enough cash then get more and kill everything unless better graphics more weapons and an actual story are things you don't like now 4 wasn't as good because it took itself to seriously but your going to say gta was only good when it had less of everythingBlackadder51 said:Crash Bash to Wrath of Cortex...
EDIT :AgreedMetalhandkerchief said:GTA 1&2 were liquid gold, then they sold their souls to the devil in 3&4.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, good one.Metalhandkerchief said:GTA 1&2 were liquid gold...
Look, I agree with the fact that GTA4 is an improvement. But please edit your posts for Grammar, I'm no Nazi but you didn't even put a full stop in the entire post. It really devalues your argument when you can't read it.alex134219 said:the way i came to my conclusions is because i played them and what territory you were everybody's lapdog after you killed enough of gang a you went to gang c they gave you money to kill some of gang b or blowup some building or steal a car then do it over and over and over until you got enough moneyDys said:That was less than coherent. What I've gathered from that was you not liking the lack of story in the old GTA games, which says to me you've completely missed the point. You are a gangster, and oldschool mafia style urban warrior taking over the streets, why does everything need a story now?alex134219 said:uh no they wasn't any story except get enough cash then get more and kill everything unless better graphics more weapons and an actual story are things you don't like now 4 wasn't as good because it took itself to seriously but your going to say gta was only good when it had less of everythingBlackadder51 said:Crash Bash to Wrath of Cortex...
EDIT :AgreedMetalhandkerchief said:GTA 1&2 were liquid gold, then they sold their souls to the devil in 3&4.
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with cruising around doing various jobs for gangs (amongs brilliant humor) while slowly playing them off against each other and moving in on their turf when they are too weak to properly defend it. The newage GTAs trade off the brilliant gameplay for mediocre gameplay with near modern graphics (they are by no means impressive, in fact SA was disguisting next to games being released alongside it). The original GTA games looked fine anyway, they sure as all hell didn't have less of everything.
The old games were all round better, they are free downloads off the rockstar website if I recall correctly, go play them, you'll see how brilliant they are.
and what comedy i just heard jokes that only appeal to 5 year olds and even then they were hit and miss then that guy at the booths voice sounded like somebody was torturing a chipmunk and yes i need a story and a reason not to destroy the entire city or kill all the gangs and take all there money
and so being able to get different weapons and actually aim is mediocre then whats a good game when you turn towards your enemies and hope you shoot them with a bland assortment of weapons wow sounds fun
plus gta san an looked OK for the time especially the PC version
Seconded, severely.CkretAznMan said:How about Halo 2? I personally thought that Halo 1 was okay, but Halo 2 was just really bad.