Gentlemen, I present Diplomacy: The Game of International Intrigue

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0

[HEADING=1]Diplomacy: The Game of International Intrigue[/HEADING]


Developer(s) Paradox interactive
Platform(s) - Personal Computer
Release date(s)- October 4th 2005
Genre(s) - Turn based strategy
Mode(s) - Single-player/Multiplayer
Rating(s)- ESRB: E (Everyone)​


If you ask my friend Napoleon Bonaparte, of the Corsican meadows Bonapartes, he?ll tell you how ?The best way to keep one?s word is not to give it?. You see, my good friend knows a thing or two about Diplomacy: The art of thinking twice before doing nothing. Since the dawn of civilization, the fate of nations has been intertwined by negotiations from everything war to peace treaties. And no game captures this better than the computerized version of a long time classic Diplomacy

Since it?s birth in ?50s the board game Diplomacy has been widely regarded as the best strategy game to ever exist. If you?ve ever stepped into a game store, you?ll know that the game is serious business. And while digital versions of the classical board game have been loyal to its nature, they have yet to acquire the same charm. Paradox Entertainment?s Diplomacy may have still fallen into the same pot hole as versions before, it still provides a loyal service to the dedicated fanbase.


[img_inline caption="France is just asking for it" width=340 height=230 align=right]http://pcmedia.gamespy.com/pc/image/article/665/665958/diplomacy-20051110023133880.jpg[/img_inline]


Diplomacy places you as the leader of one of the seven world powers[footnote]Britain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Russia, and the Ottoman Empire[/footnote] that dominated European power politics at the start of the 1900s. The game attempts to reenact the disastrous alliance system that lead to the First World War. But winning doesn't require skill or luck, but rather how good you are at using your opponent into gaining what you need.

The game places you at the head of the armed forces of you selected power. There are two kinds of units; armies and fleets, each worth one point. The game takes place on the continent of Europe, with sections divided into land and sea zones. And despite a historical setting, everyone starts of equal in military strength and resources. The only real usable advantage is the geography of Europe itself, such as Britain and France?s strategic positioning near the sea, or Russia?s access to non-powers land that surrounds it.

The ultimate goal of your conquests is to collect as many resource centers positioned around the globe. The number of centers you control dictates the number of units on the field you can have in total, so it?s vital you collect as many as possible. Creating more units requires you to leave a center in your country open at the start of a round, which means you?ll have to expand. But once nations realize there only a small number of unoccupied resource centers, fights arise over dominance home and abroad.

The game takes place over ?rounds?, or years. And each year is broken to four periods, representing the seasons. In order to take over an enemy resource center you must have dominated it by the fall of that year, and in return it becomes your possession at the start of the next year. Units can only make one move per period, so deciding where to go can be just as important as making alliances.

[img_inline caption="This gets ugly very quickly" width=340 height=220 align=left]http://cdn1.gamepro.com/screens/111901/48189-30-1.jpg[/img_inline]

Like its table top origins, the game focuses a lot on interaction with others. In order to take an area from an enemy, the player needs to have one more unit than the defender, and visa versa. A direct head to head assault between to armies or fleets would end in a stalemate, so this is where the concept of support comes to play. Players will need troops from home or foreigners to help them outmatch an enemy.

To gain such a desirable advantage, the player will need to negotiate with the heads of other states. Creating lasting alliances and tactic pacts are crucial in surviving. Interacting with the games friendly AI is simple as well. By clicking on an animated version of the period?s ruler, you can show them your desired intentions.

The animated avatar will either grunt its approval or dissatisfaction, which can be annoying, but gets the job done efficiently. Don?t worry about keeping track of treaties you have made, because the game will warn you if a move you?re making violates the preset agreement. And while minor flukes may be tolerated, a total betrayal will make it almost impossible to gain the trust of any country ever again.


A lot of this sounds confusing, and it really is. The learning curve ranges from hard to obscene, and only faithful Diplomacy table toppers will be able to pick up and play. It takes about an hour for novices to pick up the rules, and another handful of hours to stop being dominated. It?s definitely not helped by the game tutorial being too convoluted for its own good. Despite an unforgiving difficulty curve, players that don?t falter will be rewarded with one of the most mentally stimulating games ever created.

[img_inline caption="I prefer to play as Britain" width=340 height=220 align=right]http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/d/diplomacy-298837-1256609005.jpeg[/img_inline]

And let?s face it, the game?s Artificial Intelligence could never compare to a living, breathing human opponent, but that doesn?t mean it doesn?t have its own charms. Each countries leader has historically appropriate uniform and personality. However, while breaking a big treaty will cost players a lot in the game, the AI doesn?t even think twice about it, especially if you?ve let yourself vulnerable. But despite not achieving the level of complex conscious decisions as humans, the games computer opponents play style is not broken. Players won?t have to worry about stupid or cheap artificial opponents.

The multiplayer feature is much better if you?re looking for a real challenge. Especially since the ?grunt? system eliminates all possible language barriers. It may be hard to find a game, but it?s definitely worth it. The greatest playmode is the sandbox mode, which allows players to create any virtual scenario and act it out. A great way to experience all the ?what if?s? of the First and Second World War.


The visuals are pretty basic, mimicking the look and feel of the tabletop legend. Animation is fluid, but the game sadly misses the opportunity to explore beyond plastic pieces of the board game. The trouble is that the games requirements are insultingly obnoxious, especially for such low graphical achievement.

By the end of the day it?s clear that the best option is to just gather a group of friends and play the original version like it?s meant to be. The game is loyal to the series as it could get, so if you?re low on free time (or friendships) don?t feel threatened to use the game as a window into strategy games. You?ll start the game as a victim to the powers that be, but with a bit of patience, you?ll find yourself echoing a phrase attributed to another good friend of mine, Julius Caesar ?Veni, Vidi, Vici?[footnote]?I came, I saw, I conquered?[/footnote]


Pimpin Reviews
Dragon Age: Origins VS Rise of the Agronauts [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.177118-Pimpin-Reviews-Dragon-Age-Origins-vs-Rise-of-the-Argonauts]
Dragon Age Origins: DLC [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.180366-Pimpin-Reviews-Dragon-Age-Origins-DLC]
The Hero of Time (Legend of Zelda Fan Movie) [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.183579-Pimpin-Reviews-The-Hero-of-Time-The-Ocarina-of-Time-fan-movie]
Darksiders: Wrath of War [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.186512-Pimpin-Reviews-Darksiders-Wrath-of-War]
Heavy Rain [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.189128-Pimpin-Reviews-Heavy-Rain]

The Knuckleduster:
Mass Effect 2 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.182033-Pimppeter2-and-Domble-present-The-Knuckleduster-Mass-Effect-2]

Gentlemen:
The Legend of Zelda: OOT [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.183580-Gentlemen-I-present-The-Legend-of-Zelda-Ocarina-of-Time]
Diplomacy: The Game of International Intrigue [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.191357-Gentlemen-I-present-Diplomacy-The-Game-of-International-Intrigue#5993365]

Other:
The Dinner Game [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.179110-The-Dinner-Game-Movie-Review]
The Osmos Mote Manifesto [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.184424-The-Osmos-Mote-Manifesto]

Anti-Cookie.com Game Commentary
Oy vey, it's morally gray! [http://theanticookie.weebly.com/morally-grey.html]
The Victim? My time [http://theanticookie.weebly.com/times-a-wastin.html ]


Red Alert 2
Okami
Halo 2
Majora's mask
Legacy of Kain
(Please feel free to recommend!)

You can now follow Pimpin Reviews via Twitter!

http://twitter.com/PimpinReviews [http://twitter.com/PimpinReviews]

-Follow updates on reviews, and if you tweet a game to me, I'll put it at the top of the queue (meaning I will review it within a week)

Also follow me on Forum Spring

http://www.formspring.me/Pimppeter2 [http://www.formspring.me/Pimppeter2]

-Can't wait a full review? Ask me about any game and I'll give you some pimpin' replies. No sign up necessary!​
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
Random Argument Man said:
Since I wasn't able to get back at you in my previous review, I'll just do so here.

I've added MM to the list, and thanks for the complement.
 

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,113
3,283
118
This looks fun. I should try it. Axis and Allies was always my favorite though.
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
that looks awesome! At least, the table top version... Wow, what an insult, "it's better if you DON'T code it"
 

masher

New member
Jul 20, 2009
745
0
0
XD I literally just played that. It was part of my History class/grade. The drama generated in that game is Hilarious. I loved mucking up alliances between other players. XP
It is indeed, a "game of intrigue".
 

Spiner909

New member
Dec 3, 2009
1,699
0
0
I loved the board game Diplomacy. I didn't know there was a video game on it.
This is weird. What's up with your poll? My vote isn't showing up.
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
masher said:
XD I literally just played that. It was part of my History class/grade. The drama generated in that game is Hilarious. I loved mucking up alliances between other players. XP
It is indeed, a "game of intrigue".
Funnily enough, that's exactly how I got into the game. We played the board game for a full week, it was sweet (Except I had to play as France).

It got even more dramatic when the Candy prize got involved.
 

Sir Kemper

New member
Jan 21, 2010
2,248
0
0
Ah, Great Revie Pimpeter2.

I geuss even Pimps need a break from the streets to play board game eh?
 

Sir Kemper

New member
Jan 21, 2010
2,248
0
0
Deleric said:
Looks like..

This Game...

*sunglasses*

Intrigues me.
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

(Sorry for double post, I couden't let that opurtunity pass)
 

BlueInkAlchemist

Ridiculously Awesome
Jun 4, 2008
2,231
0
0
Wow... Diplomacy. Haven't played this one in ages. Usually my dad or mates go right for the rampant bloodshed of Risk.

Still, decent review, continuing Pimp's proud tradition of schooling the room. Incidentally, Pimp seems the kind of guy to excel at this in both the real-life and virtual setting. I'd love to test that. Just putting that out there.
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
Diplomacy, huh? I remember hearing about a videogame version. Great review as always, blah blah blah.

The only question is - why did you start a new column in addition to Pimpin Reviews?
 

Jared Veeser-Lynn

New member
Apr 27, 2010
7
0
0
This seems to be suspiciously alot like axis and allies and risk, maybe thats just me though. Played it its no fun unless you can actually talk to the other players and mess with their heads.
 

Cabisco

New member
May 7, 2009
2,433
0
0
I liked the review, I found I could read it well and you didn't get stuck down in pointless details which seems a big problem for many of us when we attempt this sort of thing.

Also, i'd like to suggest that your next review be of Halo 2 as i'm hoping you'll be able to be constructive on your critism or praise of the game and not fall into the regular fanboy/hater pits of doom.
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
BlueInkAlchemist said:
. Incidentally, Pimp seems the kind of guy to excel at this in both the real-life and virtual setting. I'd love to test that. Just putting that out there.
I was thinking of starting a Diplomacy Escapist User group, and hopefully starting an epic game from that. I'll tell you if we get enough interested members, I know at least 1 other guy that may want in.

Kollega said:
The only question is - why did you start a new column in addition to Pimpin Reviews?
Well the technical reason is to keep Pimpin reviews on a current release path, the other is to switch the style and format.

The real reason, of course, is boredom.

Thank for reading.

TheNamlessGuy said:
Well, I never was a fan of the board game.
As I've said before: If it isn't visual*, its not fun for me.

Still, since this is visual*, I might give it a shot.
Good show, sport.

*[sub]Visual as a video game, not visual as in can see[/sub]
You should! Thanks for reading.

rokkolpo said:
i'll be sure to pick this up sometime.

looks like an intrig....FUN game
What and intig....great comment. Thanks for reading, I hope you do try it out.

Therumancer said:
Good review, however this game has never been to my personal tastes. It's ruined marriages.
To be honest I could see that. Thanks for commenting.

Jared Veeser-Lynn said:
This seems to be suspiciously alot like axis and allies and risk, maybe thats just me though. Played it its no fun unless you can actually talk to the other players and mess with their heads.
Actually, Diplomacy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomacy_%28game%29] was released in 1954, while RISK [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_%28game%29] was released in 1957, and Axis and Allies [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_and_Allies] was the last one released in 1981.

So actually, those two are suspiciously a lot like Diplomacy. :p

I agree though, the best version is the table top one.

Sir Kemper said:
Ah, Great Revie Pimpeter2.

I guess even Pimps need a break from the streets to play board game eh?
I blame monopoly!


crimson5pheonix said:
This looks fun. I should try it. Axis and Allies was always my favorite though.
Looked Axis and Allies, and being released 30 years after Diplomacy, it seems to "borrow heavily" from the game. Though, the increased map size seems a good addition. Though, I prefer Diplomacy because its a bit more compact. I mean, the last time around our game took 12 hours to fully complete (I came in "3rd place"), so I can't even imagine how much time a real game of A&A would take.

Demon ID said:
I liked the review, I found I could read it well and you didn't get stuck down in pointless details which seems a big problem for many of us when we attempt this sort of thing.

Also, i'd like to suggest that your next review be of Halo 2 as i'm hoping you'll be able to be constructive on your critism or praise of the game and not fall into the regular fanboy/hater pits of doom.
Thanks for reading.

And as for the Halo 2 review, I hope so too! I'll be working on it soon enough.