The Ukraine has stopped the transit before for political reasons (or rather they rerouted it and lied about it). Germany was pretty pissed about this and that is one of the main reasons that Nordstream II was initiated.Excellent analysis but at the same time Russia having less and less to lose makes it more dangerous. I think you underestimate the strategic implioations of Nord Stream 2. If Germany is willing to sacrifice Ukraine to secure their Nord Stream 2 gas supply(as they would no longer need the country for transit making the country as dependent on Russian gas, with corresponding leverage, as Belarus) then that will be a huge boon to Putin. Like everytime he's prodding how far he can go and everytime there is very little pushback. Russia might be an economically weak country with a demoralized military but none the less is it seeking out confrontations while the European countries do very little to even marginally increase their military budget. Russia might be weak but it isn't lethargic like much of western Europe. This used to not really be a problem since Europe could always rely on the U.S. for their security but this era has ended. Meanwhile Putin is ordering massive placements of troops among the Russian/Ukrainian border and the European countries still just kinda stand and watch. If Ukraine falls then E.U. countries like the baltics and Poland will start shitting bricks.
Germany explicitely prefer depending only on Russia for continued gas supply instead of depending on Russia, Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics. Yes, NordSream 2 will weaken the Ukraine. But it won't strengthen Russia, it will strengthen central Europe instead. Not actually that much since after that event with the Ukraine Germany invested in huge gas storage and can take being cut off again for quite some time.
As for Russia using NordStream to pressure the Ukraine, Germany has already stated that they are perfectly happy to reroute some of the Nordstream gas back to the Ukraine should it be necessary and shouldn't they like what Russia does. So that is a non-issue.
Also the transit costs are a bit high.
As for potential military conflict : Aside from nukes there is little to actually fear for the EU, they are far more powerful than Russia. At least collectively which is why undermining the NATO alliance would be the only real threat. Even if they don't even need the US.
On Topic, i thing CDU+Greens is the most likely coalition. But which of them gets more votes will decide who is chancellor and it will probably get close here. While CDU is traditionally way stronger, the Greens have more topics people are interested in now and by far the more likable candidate. It also didn't help that CDU only chose their candidate after some really nasty infighting while the Greens managed to just agree on one without any fuss.
Greens+SPD+Linke is possible, but less likely.
I don't see CDU+Greens+FDP happeneing. They tried that last time but couldn't agree on a gouvernment strategy. And by now thay have grown even further apart.
Last edited: