Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Gets PC Details

ph0b0s123

New member
Jul 7, 2010
1,689
0
0
Hey, community how about some carrot as well as stick? With this release they are doing all the right stuff. They are not doing a straight port but are putting in graphics and features just for the PC and they are not imposing an onerous DRM scheme.

Like a child, you shout at them and with hold sales when they do something wrong, like calling 98% of PC owners pirates, and praise them with a games sale, when they do something right, like release a game without major DRM etc. If you just shout and with hold praise no matter what they do they will never learn....
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
If they keep their dirty DRM and doing a proper version then I'll buy it just to say this is what I want and not what they have been doing like with Assassin's Creed.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Well, since they've taken the enormously difficult approach of not being massive twats (difficult for them, at any rate) I might invest.

But why the hell does it need 25GB of space?

vrbtny said:
So it's basically Call of Duty, just with the ability to go invisible?

Ya'know, because that totally hasn't already been done in Crysis 1 and 2 or anything.
*slap*

The first Crysis is not like CoD.
 

MrTub

New member
Mar 12, 2009
1,742
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Tubez said:
Why should I support a company that clearly do not like their pc fanbase and only decided to be "nice" when there was a outrage against them?


I'm quite certain they still only see pc gamers as pirates.
We were angry. They changed their behavior. We're...still angry?

That's like winning, but still hating your opponent that has given in to your demands. Man alive, you're giving them ammunition now.
We will see. I still except to see a post about ubisoft qqing that their pc version had very poor sale and it was because those dirty pirates which means we're going back to always on drm which does close to nothing to stop those dirty pirates.
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
Woodsey said:
Well, since they've taken the enormously difficult approach of not being massive twats (difficult for them, at any rate) I might invest.

But why the hell does it need 25GB of space?

vrbtny said:
So it's basically Call of Duty, just with the ability to go invisible?

Ya'know, because that totally hasn't already been done in Crysis 1 and 2 or anything.
*slap*

The first Crysis is not like CoD.
I... never said it was. I may have got my English a bit wrong. What I meant was that Invisibility was already done in Crysis 1 and 2. Not CoD with invisibility.

I am well aware that Crysis is not like CoD....

For a start CoD doesn't require a monolithic machine to run it at any decent speed on any decent setting.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Tubez said:
We will see. I still except to see a post about ubisoft qqing that their pc version had very poor sale and it was because those dirty pirates which means we're going back to always on drm which does close to nothing to stop those dirty pirates.
And you're only loading the gun for them.

"I disliked your behavior, and you changed it but I'm still going to pretend I'm adhering to principles by not buying your games!" What the hell kind of sense does that make?

It's like demanding sprinkles on your ice cream or you won't buy it. They put sprinkles on it, but you still piss and moan about how you won't buy it.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
vrbtny said:
I... never said it was. I may have got my English a bit wrong. What I meant was that Invisibility was already done in Crysis 1 and 2. Not CoD with invisibility.

I am well aware that Crysis is not like CoD....

For a start CoD doesn't require a monolithic machine to run it at any decent speed on any decent setting.
Yeah, even if you surpass recommended specs by a longshot, Black Ops will still chug on your machine.
 

MrTub

New member
Mar 12, 2009
1,742
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Tubez said:
We will see. I still except to see a post about ubisoft qqing that their pc version had very poor sale and it was because those dirty pirates which means we're going back to always on drm which does close to nothing to stop those dirty pirates.
And you're only loading the gun for them.

"I disliked your behavior, and you changed it but I'm still going to pretend I'm adhering to principles by not buying your games!" What the hell kind of sense does that make?

It's like demanding sprinkles on your ice cream or you won't buy it. They put sprinkles on it, but you still piss and moan about how you won't buy it.
Except I have already tried to support them once and a few months after that ubisoft declares that all pc gamers are pirates and as far as I know they havent apologized/tried to explain that comment.

So again, why should I support the company again and be called a pirate again?
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
vrbtny said:
For a start CoD doesn't require a monolithic machine to run it at any decent speed on any decent setting.
Fact: My PC cost me 250? three years ago, and it ran Crysis and Crysis Warhead fine at 1680x1050, with a mix of high/medium and physics on very high

Fact: Call of Duty doesn't require a lot of run, but it's also running on an engine that still has bugs that IW refuses to fix

Tubez said:
We will see. I still except to see a post about ubisoft qqing
QQ is related to Alt + Q + Q - the shortcut to quit a game in Warcraft III.

It's meant to insult someone who is raging ("QQ more, noob"), by implying that he should just quit.

It's not related to crying, although QQ does look like two eyes with tears. The more you know....