Legal reasons, I'd imagine.slash2x said:No six axis and off set buttons..... soooo it is a reskin on a 360 controller...... Why not just call a spade a spade? Not that it is a bad thing... Just it is a 360 controller....
Short attention spans. The last console to do it was awful, so it's a design flaw.Owyn_Merrilin said:Why are people so convinced that a disc style D-Pad will automatically suck?
I have a ton of games now that I'm on PS+, so this seems like a solid investment as I have always hated the PS controllers.major_chaos said:Really I like the PS3 far more than the 360, but vastly prefer the 360's controller so this is actually perfect for me. Glad to hear its high quality, unlike some third party controllers.
Tell me which input is used more than any other...DaWaffledude said:I honestly do not understand why people seem to prefer the Xbox controller to the PS3 one.
It's way too bulky, the D-pad is terrible and it's assymetrical. Why on Earth would you want an assymetrical controller?
I don't assume that a disc style d-pad will automatically suck it's just that in this case the review says that the d-pad kinda sucks and per your example it's been how many years (>10?) since a company produced a disc style d-pad that didn't suck.Owyn_Merrilin said:Why are people so convinced that a disc style D-Pad will automatically suck? Yes, I know the one on the 360 did, but that's because Microsoft made a bone headed mistake and managed to make a terrible D-pad out of the best basic design. It used to be that fighting game players absolutely swore by the Sega Saturn and 6 button Genesis controllers specifically for the quality of the D-pads, both of which were of the disc variety. I've also got an old Madcatz PS1 controller with that sort of d-pad, and it likewise kicks pretty major ass.
Well first of all I was referring to the reviewer[footnote]Edit: Who didn't actually say anything about first hand experience with the D-Pad, he just bashed it for being disc style. For all either of us know, that thing could have the best D-Pad since the Saturn. It's not all that likely, but I didn't get the impression the reviewer actually tried it in a game that makes use of it before writing it off.[/footnote], not you. Second, it's been that long in the first party arena, because Microsoft is the only company to put one on a first party controller since Sega bowed out of the hardware market. If you dig around in the third party arena, you can probably find something pretty good. Heck, I've got an afterglow 360 controller that's got a better D-Pad than the ones on the official ones, despite it still being disc based. It's not even a difficult problem to solve, Microsoft just seriously screwed up the design by putting the contact plates on the circuit board on the wrong end of the pad, so they could cheap out and re-use the design from the face buttons.ThingWhatSqueaks said:I don't assume that a disc style d-pad will automatically suck it's just that in this case the review says that the d-pad kinda sucks and per your example it's been how many years (>10?) since a company produced a disc style d-pad that didn't suck.Owyn_Merrilin said:Why are people so convinced that a disc style D-Pad will automatically suck? Yes, I know the one on the 360 did, but that's because Microsoft made a bone headed mistake and managed to make a terrible D-pad out of the best basic design. It used to be that fighting game players absolutely swore by the Sega Saturn and 6 button Genesis controllers specifically for the quality of the D-pads, both of which were of the disc variety. I've also got an old Madcatz PS1 controller with that sort of d-pad, and it likewise kicks pretty major ass.
Gaming hardware is crap and behind the times.K.ur said:I'm still waiting for a mouse with thumbstick.