Google Considers Adding Cameras To Contact Lenses

Fanghawk

New member
Feb 17, 2011
3,861
0
0
Google Considers Adding Cameras To Contact Lenses

[http://pv.webbyawards.com/2014/web/general-website/games-related]

Permalink
 

Epicspoon

New member
May 25, 2010
841
0
0
My dream of becoming a cyborg without giving up my humanity gets closer and closer every day.
 

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
More relevant to the gaming side of things, these lenses would allow for accurate eye tracking. Imagine combining that with the Oculus Rift. You could have a simulator with a HUD that stays centered where you're looking, and maybe even have sight-based target acquisition.
 

Scrythe

Premium Gasoline
Jun 23, 2009
2,367
0
0
Epicspoon said:
My dream of becoming a cyborg without giving up my humanity gets closer and closer every day.
This.

I feel as though my whole life has led up to having these.
 

Sidmen

New member
Jul 3, 2012
180
0
0
Stormwaltz said:
That's the point at which I stop leaving the house.

I've had quite enough of this surveillance society crap, thanks. If it's not my government, it's random creeps on the street.
I can never understand this mentality.

So, you don't go outside because you don't want people to see you? I mean, every time someone looks at you they're recording your face in their memory and cross-referencing it with other times they may have seen you.

Sure, 99% of the time they immediately forget you, but the same thing will be true of any incidental video recordings of you that someone might get while using their contact lens camera.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Fanghawk said:
Positive applications aside, contact lens cameras would inevitably create privacy concerns, especially since they're harder to spot than a pair of glasses. Perhaps even more concerning is that the lenses would have the ability to recognize faces, <a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124579-Google-Bans-Facial-Recognition-Apps-on-Glass>a feature Google previously banned for the Glass. While the ability to recognize facial patterns isn't the same as identifying who the faces belong to, mentioning it right in the patent application is a little concerning,
you know what also creat privacy concerns? human eyes. lets gouge them out. seriuosly, if i can see it with my eyes and remember it, i can film it. end of discussion. filming it is a way to fix fallible human memory at a cost of lower resolution. If i can see it and remember it, i can film it and remember it.

Stormwaltz said:
That's the point at which I stop leaving the house.

I've had quite enough of this surveillance society crap, thanks. If it's not my government, it's random creeps on the street.
so the point where humans have eyes is when you stop leaving your house? i guess you never left it.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
Sidmen said:
Stormwaltz said:
That's the point at which I stop leaving the house.

I've had quite enough of this surveillance society crap, thanks. If it's not my government, it's random creeps on the street.
I can never understand this mentality.

So, you don't go outside because you don't want people to see you? I mean, every time someone looks at you they're recording your face in their memory and cross-referencing it with other times they may have seen you.

Sure, 99% of the time they immediately forget you, but the same thing will be true of any incidental video recordings of you that someone might get while using their contact lens camera.
The difference is you can't upload your memories to the internet for the whole world to see. Ya, sure, there's always word of mouth, but that has a more limited range and isn't considered very reliable.

Frankly my main question when it comes to these things is why? Outside of augmented reality games, which are kinda lame and gimmicky if you ask me, I can't really see the value of having a screen overlaying your vision. Your eyes are really only capable of focusing on one thing at a time, so even when using google glass/lenses you're still not paying attention to what's in front of you, you might as well just be looking at an actual screen. It just seems to me like a solution looking for a problem.
 

Roxor

New member
Nov 4, 2010
747
0
0
Sounds like Torchwood's I-5s are going to be a reality soon. I'm not too sure if that's a good thing or not.

Maybe we should head off the potential problems of all this surveillance tech by making it illegal to obtain information about an individual without their explicit consent and allowing the individual concerned to wipe any and all information about themselves whenever they want, regardless of who possesses it.
 

iseko

New member
Dec 4, 2008
727
0
0
This... is going to make so many people go blind. I am sure of it. I don't know how yet but it will. I'm putting down my money it. Still cool though. C'mon HUD. I'm waiting on you buddy!
 

kailus13

Soon
Mar 3, 2013
4,568
0
0
I'd give it about a week before someone uses this illegally. And that's being generous.

Porn companies would probably appreciate it though.
 

alj

Master of Unlocking
Nov 20, 2009
335
0
0
Very cool tech, i want my eyes to be able to ZOOM :)

The joke in red dwarf would not make much scene anymore however where chriton cannot find the human zoom function when he is turned into one and lister tells him we dont have one we just move our head closer to the object
 

Ariseishirou

New member
Aug 24, 2010
443
0
0
On the one hand, you can record anything you can see, which would be a godsend to the dregs of humanity who take creepshots.

On the other, it would certainly help people prosecute crimes that are otherwise so often he said/she said, like harassment and sexual assault. Judges and juries would get a recording of exactly what happened.

I'm for it, honestly.
 

thewatergamer

New member
Aug 4, 2012
647
0
0
Uhhhhhh while this is cool in concept for games...

The last thing I want is more cameras in my house and on the streets constantly watching everything I do, so no way too creepy for my liking, I have enough cameras around me already thank you very much
 

waj9876

New member
Jan 14, 2012
600
0
0
They'd have to seriously compensate for the amount of movement your eye does, even when you're staring at something stationary, or focusing on some specific, unmoving thing, your eye makes tons of rapid movements.
 

kenu12345

Seeker of Ancient Knowledge
Aug 3, 2011
573
0
0
Freaking sweet. Would be really be helpful for alot. Probably going to be expensive as heck when they first come out though. No matter! I will save up. I would freakin love all these things this does