Google's Self-Driving Cars Pass 300,000 Miles Accident-Free

Aris Khandr

New member
Oct 6, 2010
2,353
0
0
I'd be all for this. Especially as someone who is considering a cross-country move. Driving from Georgia to Washington would suck, but it would suck far less if I could just read a book or watch TV on my iPad, and let the car worry about getting me there.
 

Grumpy Ginger

New member
Jul 9, 2012
85
0
0
You're already seeing some of this today with cars that can autopark themselves. I think it's going to take a while though. We'll probably start of with simple aid systems. Then to driving but still with the option to take over. It will be a while before anybody myself included would be willing to let a car take the place of the driver completely.
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,310
0
0
Hevva said:
In addition to this, Google is planning to train the cars in how to handle wintery weather, temporary construction and diversion signs, and other "tricky conditions" that drivers tend to encounter on the road. The company is planning to use the newly-added Lexus RX450h self-driving model to achieve this.
I would volunteer in a heartbeat for this operation, except for one problem:

Michigan only has two seasons: winter season, and construction season. Google cars wouldn't last 40 miles here, no matter the time of year.

Still, this is awesome. The future is coming, and it looks pretty damn sweet.
 

DugMachine

New member
Apr 5, 2010
2,566
0
0
Well this is neat but still I don't think i'd put my trust in a computer doing the driving for me.
 

A Satanic Panda

New member
Nov 5, 2009
714
0
0
Think of the economic advantages of of a driver-free world: less money toward medical treatment for vehicular injuries, all the gas saved from much reduced traffic, and think of all the man hours and productivity wasted in rush hour. All this assuming the cars can coordinate with each other [small]to kill their masters in one big horrific crash[/small]

to transport everyone as efficiently as possible on a large scale.
 

TIMESWORDSMAN

Wishes he had fewer cap letters.
Mar 7, 2008
1,040
0
0
I would hardly call twelve cars a "fleet".

Also, a friend of mine once said that when cars can drive themselves, she would stop driving.
This statement carried no hint of irony, so it looks like she'll be coming into some resale money soon.
 

Dimitriov

The end is nigh.
May 24, 2010
1,215
0
0
KingsGambit said:
I didn't even know they were working on such a thing. This is fascinating, cutting edge stuff. I'll be sure to look for more info once time allows, very interested to learn about further developments.

Her's an interesting talking point however, that was posed by Jeremy Clarkson in an episode of Top Gear, when talking about the subject of cars that drive themselves. Not word for word.

It is statistically proven that the greatest cause of the majority (ie. greater than half) of aeroplane accidents is due to pilot error.
It's also (and has been for some time) well known that it is technologically possible for a plane to take off, fly and land itself perfectly without any human intervention.
Therefore we know for fact that a plane which flew itself would be safer than a plane with a human pilot.
But knowing this, who would be willing to fly on a plane without a human pilot?

Yes, but isn't it reasonable to assume that this is caused in part by the complacency of pilots who have been trained to pretty much just trust their instruments? and who have the expectation that the plane can do most things by itself?

This seems to me like a terrible thing, it's just going to remove another aspect of living, and further reduce the need for human interaction. It is also just another thing we are apparently trying to delegate to machines. For what reason I can't imagine. People don't take pride in their own damn accomplishments anymore, there's seems to be a growing malaise of apathy about simply living.

Seriously, I know makes me sound like a grumpy old man, or some doomsday whack job, but there is a point to be made there. For most people it seems like the more machines we create to do stuff for us the less reason we have to live. It's as if we are willfully making ourselves obsolete. And that's just a stupid idea.

And if this sort of thing catches on and something ever does go wrong then your average driver won't even have a fucking clue what to do about it. After all, most of the skill of driving comes from the automatic reactions built up by experience.

I, for one would, rather die due to pilot error than a malfunctioning robotic vehicle (although obviously I'd rather not die at all).
 

Lancer873

New member
Oct 10, 2009
520
0
0
tmande2nd said:
Screw all those military ideas.

Google is going to become Skynet people.
Just watch.
I, for one, welcome our new Google overlords!

OT: I will trust unmanned cars the moment everyone is using them. Then cars will be able to communicate with each other and traffic will be optimized. Crashes will still be a thing as long as there's one person left driving manually, and I'd like to be able to see my crashes coming.
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
I don't care if it does 100.000.000.000 kilometers I'm still not getting one. I'm fine with my steering-wheel, my stick and my pedals. Not to mention driving is fun (that is to say driving on twisty country roads is fun while I can see it becoming a bit of a drag if your entire country's infrastructure consists of arrow-straight motorways).
 

dvd_72

New member
Jun 7, 2010
581
0
0
So I wont actually need to get my drivers license after all? I wont complain!

With the rate technology is growing I doubt it'll take too much longer before this goes public.
 

persephone

Poisoned by Pomegranates
May 2, 2012
165
0
0
Considering I can't currently drive due to physical disability, I really want these things to be out there. Being able to go places on my own rather than relying on family members would make a huge difference in my life. That said, we need to be absolutely sure they're safe before just any idiot can buy one.
 

Jingle Fett

New member
Sep 13, 2011
379
0
0
At first I didn't really like the the idea. You know, Terminator, I Robot, etc.

But then I realized the #1 advantage of this car...

Get wasted at the bar and let the car drive you home.




Also...If two cars are driving themselves and get into an accident, who is held responsible? Google? The cars? I'm guessing there'd need to be a new type of insurance or something that would cover driverless accidents specifically...
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
While it would be hard to imagine a sensible human being agreeing to be driven around by a set of computers right now, it increasingly seems to be the case that that might not be such a ludicrous idea in the future.
kidding or stupid?

around 80% of car accidents happen due to driver error. If we remove driver error by replacing it with computer, iamgine how much safer it would be. Not tn mention no more "i drive 200km per hour because i dont want to look slow" crap.
 

jebbo

New member
Jul 17, 2009
268
0
0
Google is perfecting autopilot and every day sci-fi slowly becomes sci-fact..
SO WHERE'S MY JETPACK???
 

iniudan

New member
Apr 27, 2011
538
0
0
persephone said:
That said, we need to be absolutely sure they're safe before just any idiot can buy one.
Actually, the idiot buying it first is a good thing, since it would prevent them from driving like idiot on the road. =p

jebbo said:
Google is perfecting autopilot and every day sci-fi slowly becomes sci-fact..
SO WHERE'S MY JETPACK???
If you happen to have $200k laying around, communicate with http://www.jetpackinternational.com/ , for that price they should have a jetpack available for you once you went through training. =p
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Driving is fun.

Being driven around in a hybrid lexus by computers seems... Stressful, and not fun at all.

While technologically cool, i don't want this future. I can see that in under 50 years from now we'll all be driving around in completely electric cars that are completely automated, with the driver in the seat with a wheel just for tradition. Don't forget the 'safety cameras' monitoring everyones every move.

Seems like the next 20 years will be the last time the human race will get to enjoy freedom and fun, and you know what?
It's googles fault.
 

Pipotchi

New member
Jan 17, 2008
958
0
0
Its amazing no doubt but even if it were leased for public use there would still be loads of regular cars on the roads.

I imagine an AI controlled car is much more expensive than a regular one. Plus it's a Lexus I'm never going to buy a Lexus, I'm not Alan Partridge :)