1. No that couldn't be said of Ron and Hermione. Both of them showed clear signs of liking each other more throughout the whole series. It was only really obvious since book 4, but it was there before. It might have not been perfect chemistry but there was definetly something there.Alex Co said:The same could be said regarding Ron and Hermione, though.
Well, Rowling should have made Ron achieve more. When I was reading Deathly Hallows, it mentioned that Dumbledore had no interaction with Ron aside from one instance (I think). This was the part where Scrimgeour was handing out the stuff Dumbledore left for Harry, Hermione and Ron. The second "lead" of the series hasn't had more than a few minutes' chat with the headmaster and they're both in every book! Can you imagine that?!
2. Yeah i can. After all Dumbledore was most cencentrated on Harry and had no particular reason to converse with Ron or Hermione other than that they are friends with Harry. Besides Hermione had no really interaction with Dumbledore either, it was just Harry.
I read what Rowling says another time and to me it sounds more like this:
She intended Ron and Hermione to end up together from the start, but feels that it wasn't that fitting in the later books and she mostly did it because she had intended to.
I partially agree. I don't think it was completely unfitting in the end, but it needed a bit more work. They should have gotten more romantic development in the 5th book and started really going out a bit sooner than the last battle.
Then again the romantic relationships were not really the part of the books i was interested in so what do i know...