How can Tommy be female? Power Rangers

Elijin

Elite Muppet
Legacy
Feb 15, 2009
2,067
1,028
118
altnameJag said:
Considering that, as far as I know, the Green/White Ranger in the US Power Rangers never had to solve a problem with his dick, I don't have a problem with Tomi or Tammy or whoever being the Green/White Ranger.
If you want to run off sheer technicality, the problem of the Green/White Ranger was solved because he had a dick. In that he was an evil character sent by Rita to kick the shit out of the power rangers (and constantly did). Until he fell victim to the one thing everyone can relate to: Kimberly was cute. The core of his transformation from bad to good came from him liking Kimberly, and giving everyone time of day in his human form to spend time with her. Until eventually that cursed friendship nonsense won him over.

Maybe new Tommy could fall for Trini instead? Just to cut off everyones 'but that changes the story even more!' complaints....The original Mighty Morphin' were the most popular well adjusted kids to ever attend a highschool. The new setting has given each of them tragic back stories and flaws. Your story is dead, get over it.

Also, Tomika, Tommie.

Oh right, and Tommy(female) was in the top 40% of female names in the 2000 US census, so it turns out Tommy is already a girls name and some of you are huge babies.
 

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,865
0
0
Redryhno said:
Parasondox said:
Tomi. There we go. She's now female. What's the big deal here?
Being lore-friendly? I mean, what do you gain by playing with the power of 63 here? Like, make up a new character, don't be a lazy shit-fer-brains and bank on name recognition alone. It's part of why the new Ghostbusters was so reviled and uninteresting for so many long-time fans of the franchise.
Lore-friendly? On Power Rangers?
So, this

Kids with attitude


Ai-yi-yi-yi-yi


Sexy Rita
are fair game for the lore, but having a 3rd female ranger is "going too far"?
 

Parasondox

New member
Jun 15, 2013
3,229
0
0
undeadsuitor said:
Elijin said:
altnameJag said:
Considering that, as far as I know, the Green/White Ranger in the US Power Rangers never had to solve a problem with his dick, I don't have a problem with Tomi or Tammy or whoever being the Green/White Ranger.
If you want to run off sheer technicality, the problem of the Green/White Ranger was solved because he had a dick. In that he was an evil character sent by Rita to kick the shit out of the power rangers (and constantly did). Until he fell victim to the one thing everyone can relate to: Kimberly was cute. The core of his transformation from bad to good came from him liking Kimberly, and giving everyone time of day in his human form to spend time with her. Until eventually that cursed friendship nonsense won him over.

Maybe new Tommy could fall for Trini instead? Just to cut off everyones 'but that changes the story even more!' complaints....The original Mighty Morphin' were the most popular well adjusted kids to ever attend a highschool. The new setting has given each of them tragic back stories and flaws. Your story is dead, get over it.

Also, Tomika, Tommie.

Oh right, and Tommy(female) was in the top 40% of female names in the 2000 US census, so it turns out Tommy is already a girls name and some of you are huge babies.
Girl!Tommy/trini/Kimberly love triangle

Calling it now
Save that for the porn version.

Time to nominate your choice for which adult actress who will play these characters.
 

Scarytown_v1legacy

New member
Mar 24, 2017
40
0
0
Well here's my two cents: From what I've been reading (and please somebody correct me if I'm wrong), most of the suggestions of making Tommy a girl is coming from the new cast. They are all in their early twenties (except the actor that plays Zack, he's 29). So 4 out of 5 of them wouldn't have even been born when The Green Ranger/White Ranger story line happened. Most of the reason Power Rangers got a big movie reboot is the studios trying to cash in on nostalgia and get people who grew up with the original Power Rangers (along with maybe their kids) in seats. That's not to say the new cast members couldn't have been fans, it just seems unlikely the movie was originally built around their demographic. So it seems to me that it would benefit the studios to keep with a male Tommy.

That being said, I personally have no investment into the new series, so they can change Tommy into whomever they like.

Also, what would it take for an Asian bro to have any other roles besides "High-schooler" when he hits 30?
 

MCerberus

New member
Jun 26, 2013
1,168
0
0
undeadsuitor said:
Silentpony said:
Tammy. Done.
Fuck Tammy

She killed bird person
He got better...

OT - Power Rangers has two out of shape idiots attempting to bully a martial arts club and said that wizards coexisted with dinosaurs. And yet the name has gone too far.

Though if you're talking about taking a dump on the spirit of the thing, gender swapping any character is really irrelevant. The awful thing is they turned teen with attitude->power ranger into more YA destiny "you were born for this" bullshit.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
Zontar said:
It's not a rumour, it's just another character who has become victim of the "white males cannot exist in media, so they all need to change" types who are a cancer that after Ghostbusters will likely not be listened to by anyone putting up their money on these projects.

There's no chance of it happening.
They made Tommy native American
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,981
118
ObsidianJones said:
Zontar said:
It's not a rumour, it's just another character who has become victim of the "white males cannot exist in media, so they all need to change" types who are a cancer that after Ghostbusters will likely not be listened to by anyone putting up their money on these projects.

There's no chance of it happening.
They made Tommy native American
Don't bother him with details, he's too busy for that kind of stuff.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,981
118
votemarvel said:
Zontar said:
No, the changes such as retconning the Asari as having trans individuals in their species (a mono-gendered species that doesn't even have words for male equivalent terms and titles) that actively turns off fans and only is seen as a positive by the gender activist types is indeed pandering given how small that group is compared to gaming culture.
I can think of one example of them doing just that.

Matriarch Aethyta refers to herself as Liara's father, even correcting Shepard who tells her that on Earth both women would be referred to as the mother.

So Andromeda isn't the first of the series to have Asari refer to themselves with male terms.
Actually I think this makes sense. Remember the Asari that is talking to Shepherd is talking to a bi-gender species, so she would likely use terms that make sense to them. When I heard he say "father" I took it to mean simply "I'm the other Asari that got busy with the Asari that actually, physically gave birth to her (mother), but I'm just the other genetic/psychic material donor (father)."
And seeing as she was talking to an outsider about the intricacies of Asari procreation, it's not unreasonable to think she would use a term that made sense to her audience. (Shepherd, and by proxy, us).


And there is nothing saying that they don't have a different word for the "other partner" when it comes to defining who gave birth and who didn't. Since we never actually hear anyone use the Asari native language, and are hearing everyone speaking English (or whatever language you set it too), they are of course limited to the vocabulary available to that language. You know, so the audience knows what the hell they are talking about.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
Happyninja42 said:
ObsidianJones said:
Zontar said:
It's not a rumour, it's just another character who has become victim of the "white males cannot exist in media, so they all need to change" types who are a cancer that after Ghostbusters will likely not be listened to by anyone putting up their money on these projects.

There's no chance of it happening.
They made Tommy native American
Don't bother him with details, he's too busy for that kind of stuff.
It's not really pointing anything out when most people aren't aware he's native given his tribe is one of the many that can be confused for white.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
Happyninja42 said:
And there is nothing saying that they don't have a different word for the "other partner" when it comes to defining who gave birth and who didn't. Since we never actually hear anyone use the Asari native language, and are hearing everyone speaking English (or whatever language you set it too), they are of course limited to the vocabulary available to that language. You know, so the audience knows what the hell they are talking about.
While that could be true, that doesn't really do anything to explain the retconing of the fact that the Asari now have male pronouns and trans individuals explicitly (with no relation to them being the non-birthing parent in a relationship) thanks to Andromeda. There's really no way to reconcile it with previous canon.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,981
118
Zontar said:
Happyninja42 said:
And there is nothing saying that they don't have a different word for the "other partner" when it comes to defining who gave birth and who didn't. Since we never actually hear anyone use the Asari native language, and are hearing everyone speaking English (or whatever language you set it too), they are of course limited to the vocabulary available to that language. You know, so the audience knows what the hell they are talking about.
While that could be true, that doesn't really do anything to explain the retconing of the fact that the Asari now have male pronouns and trans individuals explicitly (with no relation to them being the non-birthing parent in a relationship) thanks to Andromeda. There's really no way to reconcile it with previous canon.
Actually I think it does work with the male pronoun, like I said in my previous post, about that term being used to denote the Asari who provided genetic/psychic material for the child, but didn't actually gestate and give birth.

Now, the transgender terms introduced in Andromeda, I can't speak on that, haven't played the game, don't plan on it. I'm only referring to that scene in ME 3 with Liara's father. I have no issue with how it was presented in that game. Bioware is perfectly capable of doing stupid stuff in other ways, in other games. They've certainly got a track record for dumb game decisions with their other lines.

But, there is I think, some validity in arguing for them deciding how to identify themselves. If a species is uni-gender, is it accurate to use the term "she" anyway? What does "she" mean in a species that has no gender deviation? It's entirely possible, and I think likely, that it's just an artifact of human speech patterns, and that they designed the Asari to look female, based on HUMAN traits. But, considering that there is that scene in ME 3, where the 3 different species are all arguing about what the Asari actually look like, would a "she" classification even fit? It reminds me of a tv show from the 80's, called Alien Nation. In a series of episodes, they go into detail about the reproductive cycle of the alien species. And for their species, both parties end up "carrying" the baby, but in the end, the "male" is the one that actually gives birth to the final product. Yet, they still refer to him as "he", and he is perfectly fine with this gender classification. Yet, he was, biologically doing stuff, that for our planet, is limited (in most cases) to the female. So I don't really see how it's that big of a stretch, for a fictional, alien species, to use gender terms in a way that is different from us.

Perhaps, in their species, the terms he/she, are used to denote differences in personality. Or, maybe they just don't use them at all really, and have since adopted them, for dealing with multi-gender species, to try and differentiate something in their own species, that doesn't really have a proper allegory in ours. It's simply a lost in translation kind of thing, and the closest they can come up with is to use "he" when trying to refer to that type of person from their species.

This is all speculation of course, I don't know what Bioware was actually thinking when they came up with it. But since the species is completely fictional, any and all aspects of them are completely up to change by the creators. That and they can always chalk it up to "This was an aspect of their culture that just never came up before."
 

Veylon

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,626
0
0
This whole thing baffles me. Why rehash a Power Ranger team when they can just make a new one? The show has been doing that for twenty years. There have already been female Red Rangers before, if that's what they are worried about. If they really feel the need to pander to the original audience, they could bring back the original actor as a retired mentor figure, which is another thing the show has already done. And I still can't get over those ugly, ugly mottled suits. They look like their own evil twins.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
How can Tommy be female? Because the Power Rangers aren't real.
Ok, that's kinda dismissive, but I'm sure if they want to do it they'll come up with some reason.

I'm more interested in why people are now trying to convince Zontar that teh femalez/teh gayz aren't ruining games, films and comics.
If the mere inclusion is ruining it for him, yeah. We're ruining all the things, and it's just gonna keep happening.
 

Phoenixmgs_v1legacy

Muse of Fate
Sep 1, 2010
4,691
0
0
Zontar said:
What, the fact I don't pretend this 'rumour' is anything other then more SJWs demanding changes to things they don't even consume (and we have the numbers to prove it) to the determent of the people who do (and again the numbers prove they leave) who want another character to have a pointless sex change for literally no justifiable reason against the wishes of the inbuilt fan base and given what we saw in the movie pretty much against what the movie has set up for the potential sequel as well?

At least anime isn't likely to cater to these people given they make no secret of the fact they only care about what makes money, and those who spend money on their products are not these people, and even 100% pandering to them will never change that fact.
Zontar said:
It's already killed comics, it did a number on video games, and television continues its downward spiral.
Just wow... I can hardly process the amount of backwards logic and complete opposition to actual facts in these posts. So "normal" pandering is OK but not SJW pandering? Comics fell off because of pandering to only their hardcore audience. If you don't make new fans, your market will die because people get bored of the same stuff eventually and people don't live forever. Same thing will happen to anime if it hasn't already; I was semi into anime at one point, but the state it is now is a joke. Thus, you ALWAYS need to pander to both current fans and potentially new fans. Do you actually think it's OK for video game devs to be told by publishers they can't make a game with the protagonist they want? When Heavenly Sword was shown at E3, it was the only game with a female protagonist shown that year. How is that a good thing? Television is in its golden age now, there's so many great shows. Network TV is most likely down because people don't watch TV on appointment anymore, network TV is like pagers vs cell phones. Not too mention the Nielsen rating system has always been flawed. Plus, network TV has never up its quality to contend with cable shows and now streaming shows. Where can I watch something like Legion or Billions or Westworld on network TV?

Here's the proof of diversity comics not being the cause for the "death" of comics:
http://www.cbr.com/no-diversity-didnt-kill-marvels-comic-sales/
"Having dug into the data, it's become clear that diversity is not hurting Marvel. The truth is, Marvel's "diverse" titles actually sell decently. The problem, instead, appears to be a hollowing-out of Marvel's traditional A-List, titles whose sales have dropped by tens of thousands of copies in the past few years."
 

Redryhno

New member
Jul 25, 2011
3,077
0
0
hermes said:
Redryhno said:
Parasondox said:
Tomi. There we go. She's now female. What's the big deal here?
Being lore-friendly? I mean, what do you gain by playing with the power of 63 here? Like, make up a new character, don't be a lazy shit-fer-brains and bank on name recognition alone. It's part of why the new Ghostbusters was so reviled and uninteresting for so many long-time fans of the franchise.
Lore-friendly? On Power Rangers?
So, this

are fair game for the lore, but having a 3rd female ranger is "going too far"?
I don't remember saying I was fully okay with any of that. The topic was "Tommy with boobs", not everything else in the movie. And it's not "having a 3rd female Ranger". So shut that shit down right the fuck now, I am sick and tired of that being the only thing taken from literally anything negative said about this potential change. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything but using a character's name and playing rule 63 with them.

I don't care if there's another female Ranger, I've specifically said multiple times, even in the bit you're quoting, that they can do whatever they want, but if they're going to do that, they may as well just actually make an effort and create a new character.

Again, this is all assuming this is actually a rumor and not just internet bullshittery.
 

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,865
0
0
Redryhno said:
hermes said:
Redryhno said:
Parasondox said:
Tomi. There we go. She's now female. What's the big deal here?
Being lore-friendly? I mean, what do you gain by playing with the power of 63 here? Like, make up a new character, don't be a lazy shit-fer-brains and bank on name recognition alone. It's part of why the new Ghostbusters was so reviled and uninteresting for so many long-time fans of the franchise.
Lore-friendly? On Power Rangers?
So, this

are fair game for the lore, but having a 3rd female ranger is "going too far"?
I don't remember saying I was fully okay with any of that. The topic was "Tommy with boobs", not everything else in the movie. And it's not "having a 3rd female Ranger". So shut that shit down right the fuck now, I am sick and tired of that being the only thing taken from literally anything negative said about this potential change. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything but using a character's name and playing rule 63 with them.

I don't care if there's another female Ranger, I've specifically said multiple times, even in the bit you're quoting, that they can do whatever they want, but if they're going to do that, they may as well just actually make an effort and create a new character.

Again, this is all assuming this is actually a rumor and not just internet bullshittery.
For all intents and purposes, this IS a new character... unless they plan to make her into an evil ranger that changes her ways because of romantic (lesbian) feelings for the pink ranger, or remaking the story again, I am pretty sure she has nothing in common with the original Tommy (apart from their nicknames, which, like all the other characters in the movie, share the same name as their original counterparts), so... congratulations on getting a new character.

My point is that there are a lot of things that are not "lore-friendly" in the last movie. From the origin of major characters to their design and personalities... so why should THIS be the point were they draw a line in the sand and concern with such a thing as "lore-friendliness"? Making the yellow ranger latina and the black ranger asian... no problem. Making Rita Repulsa some sort of sexy Kerrigan... go ahead. Making the green ranger female... are you mad? How dare you tinker with the sacred Power Ranger mythology!

Unlike your example of Ghostbusters, no other character is gender bended in this movie and we don't even know her role, so what would be the point of invoking rule 63 here, or being horrified by it?
 

Redryhno

New member
Jul 25, 2011
3,077
0
0
hermes said:
For all intents and purposes, this IS a new character... unless they plan to make her into an evil ranger that changes her ways because of romantic (lesbian) feelings for the pink ranger, or remaking the story again, I am pretty sure she has nothing in common with the original Tommy (apart from their nicknames, which, like all the other characters in the movie, share the same name as their original counterparts), so... congratulations on getting a new character.

My point is that there are a lot of things that are not "lore-friendly" in the last movie. From the origin of major characters to their design and personalities... so why should THIS be the point were they draw a line in the sand and concern with such a thing as "lore-friendliness"? Making the yellow ranger latina and the black ranger asian... no problem. Making Rita Repulsa some sort of sexy Kerrigan... go ahead. Making the green ranger female... are you mad? How dare you tinker with the sacred Power Ranger mythology!

Unlike your example of Ghostbusters, no other character is gender bended in this movie and we don't even know her role, so what would be the point of invoking rule 63 here, or being horrified by it?
And yet again, things are turned into a bigger problem than the person making the statement has specifically said. Amazing how it always turns into "you just don't like females".

I don't like that the bit of the movie I've seen(long story short, fiance and I went, then had to leave like five minutes in because her baby brother is a bit of an idiot at times and decided to Tarzan off the roof of her parent's house and didn't jump far enough out to catch a tree branch, he's fine, just got a sorta nasty cut on his chest from a broken branch he fell through) has them all turn into some kind of weird mix of Animorphs and Breakfast Club. I don't like any of that, but I didn't really have a chance to see pretty much anything else you're talking about.

And alot of that applies here too, if you're going to use the original cast's names, then actually use the original character's characteristics. If not, then name them something else and have a ball. Got nothing wrong with original characters, provided they're actually done well. Hell, they've got like twenty years of characters to go through, mix and match could've been something interesting.