The problem with that campaign, one of the big ones anyways, is that "cute" is hard-coded into our brains, and anything that doesn't meet the requirements for "cute" is either deadly, useless, or edible. This is why people, and animals in general, put up with babies, because you would never let something not cute live in your house, eat all your food, and poop all over the walls. If PETA want to make fish cute, they need to develop a retro-virus that will change millions of years of evolution in our brains.Tesahli said:I do remember though when PETA decided they wanted to go after fishing and started the "Sea-Kittens" campaign in a hope to change the image of fish to something more adorable and likable. As far as I can tell, in terms of their group goals it was a horrible failure, though in terms of giving Internet-cynics something to laugh at, it was a great success.randommaster said:You can theoretically "save" all the animals, but some species are harder to save than others. We do, however, decide which animals to treat favorably, mainly on how cute they are. (You never hear people exclaim "save the monk fish!" because it's ugly.)Hainted said:so now humanity decides which animals are "needed".I hope you realize we didn't magic up any of these animals,but only domesticated their wild ancestors.And it's not ironic it's called being a hypocrite.you either protect ALL the animals or NONE of the animals.Gooble said:There'd be absolutely no need for any breeds that provide meat, so they'd all get slaughtered because they're taking up all the farmland that could be used to grow veg. Temporarily ironic I know.
Like someone was saying in another thread, if we ate polar bears they wouldn't be endangered. If we stopped eating beef cattle say then they would probably become endangered-all the meat poachers wanting to kill them for a start.
If we want to stop the cows from producing methane, we have to stop buying beef. We can still eat beef, we just have to make breeding large numbers of cows unprofitable. Do the Earth a favor and start rustling cattle!
I find this quote so hilarious, because as far as I can tell the United States are the only country in the world in which there's still doubt as to whether global warming is actually happening.Quotation Marx said:"With all of the hysteria, all of the fear, all of the phony science, could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people? It sure sounds like it." -James M.Inhofe
"Don't fix what's not broken." -That counts as a proverb or saying, doesn't it? Digging up whoever said that would be a pain.Travdelosmuertos said:Cattle cause more pollution than all the cars in America. You can provide somewhere between several times more food per acre if you were growing soy in place of cattle. Many of those acres being used were once dense jungle that converted CO2 into oxygen. Without a highly oxygenated environment, humans cannot exist. Eventually we'll just suffocate ourselves.
And no, I'm not veggie, or vegan. I enjoy meat but I try to keep it to free range when possible. In fact, I just ate a delicious pulled pork sandwich from a local bbq place.
Another point to consider: the greenhouse effect was discovered on Venus and scientists study it to learn how to keep that from happening to Earth. I'm not saying man-made global warming exists but if the Earth is warming up, shouldn't we try to change that regardless of whose fault it is?
My suggestion for you: Order a coffin and hire an undertaker to bury you... no difference, really.Why are people arrogant enough to think that they can make a difference? Why do think that we're actually changing anything again?
I agree with this though I think the fact that oil kills/oppresses everyone and everything it touches is reason enough.Lord Azrael said:The real reason for the development of alternative fuel sources is that the world's non-renewable fuels will one day deplete and we should be prepared, no other reasons, none of this hair-brained inflammatory [sic] pseudo science!
Just because your car hasn't broken down yet doesn't mean it couldn't use a tune up. Sometimes a proactive stance is best. The planet on which I live is as good a candidate for that philosophy as any I've seen.Quotation Marx said:"Don't fix what's not broken." -That counts as a proverb or saying, doesn't it? Digging up whoever said that would be a pain.Travdelosmuertos said:Condensed
"Almost every wise saying has an opposite one, no less wise, to balance it." - George SantayanaQuotation Marx said:Also, back to the quoting stuff.
In the spirit of Quotation Marx:SamLowry said:My suggestion for you: Order a coffin and hire an undertaker to bury you... no difference, really.Why are people arrogant enough to think that they can make a difference? Why do think that we're actually changing anything again?
id like to see you digest grass. because most of our livestock eats grass.samaritan.squirrel said:Deforestation for cattle-growing space. Not good. Also, rearing an animal takes a lot of food that we could just eat ourselves.