I honestly don't know how I'd feel about it. We've had it since OoT and it always makes the combat feel awesome.
How would you react if future 3D Zelda games got rid of Z-Targeting?
- Thread starter Sean Hollyman
- Start date
Let me put it this way - if a person was in favor of removing the Z-targeting system, I would have to consider them a member of the "Not Z" Party.
Friends don't let friends join the Not Z Party.
Friends don't let friends join the Not Z Party.
I'd swim to Nintendo's HQ in Kyoto, find Eiji Aonuma, and slap upside the head Gib's style because if a 3D Zelda game didn't have it then combat would be a problem. 2D, isometric Zelda games would do fine without it, but 3D Zelda games would become a huge pain.
Ugh, just trying to imagine Twilight Princess or Wind Waker without Z targeting makes me sick. >.<
I mean, against Ganondorf in OoT you don't have it, but you can easily position yourself to play tennis with Ganondorf. If you were against say Ghirahim without some type of targeting then that'd be annoying.
Ugh, just trying to imagine Twilight Princess or Wind Waker without Z targeting makes me sick. >.<
I mean, against Ganondorf in OoT you don't have it, but you can easily position yourself to play tennis with Ganondorf. If you were against say Ghirahim without some type of targeting then that'd be annoying.
Wait there is Z targeting? I always free lanced swung my sword. Ao impersonally wouldn't care. Then again i haven't played a zelda game since OOT, so i probably wouldn't care anyways.
Fine then , i'll make my own Not Z party! With hookers and blackjack! It will be the best Not Z party ever!
Ha, clever.Dead Seerius said:
Fine then , i'll make my own Not Z party! With hookers and blackjack! It will be the best Not Z party ever!
I wouldn't mind so long as it's replaced with something better.
I think Wind Waker was the last Zelda game that I really dug the combat, all the sword fights and the ability to pick up weapons.
I think Wind Waker was the last Zelda game that I really dug the combat, all the sword fights and the ability to pick up weapons.
That I need to get home quickly because I'm clearly in an alternate dimension. Why in the WORLD would anyone get rid of that? The lock-on is an essential tool in any kind of action game.
No it is an essential tool to overcome any games horrid camera control, if the underlying problem got fixed that would never be necessary.Aiddon said:
But seeing as the resounding vote on Zelda is to keep it all the same devs really have no choice on the matter, they can only keep doing the old things as expected.
May I see a game with what you would consider 'good' camera control? I have yet to see a good 3D action game that wouldn't benefit from some kind of lock-on system.Mr.K. said:
I would be nonplussed if I heard they got rid of the targeting system. How would you aim your projectile weapons in a timely manner? How would you perform Jump attacks or Parry attacks?
Well, given that we have Wii Motes, 3DS', and GamePads, it should be fairly easy to continue playing future 3D Zelda titles without the function of a Z-Targeting system.
So long as we can still strife and effectively aim, I don't think it will be such a hindrance. Parry and counter attacks might be tricky to pull off, but as long as they aren't flat-out broken like in AC3, that won't be too difficult to adjust to.
So long as we can still strife and effectively aim, I don't think it will be such a hindrance. Parry and counter attacks might be tricky to pull off, but as long as they aren't flat-out broken like in AC3, that won't be too difficult to adjust to.