What I think is stupid is this argument.3asytarg3t said:What's stupid is how held back game development for PCs is because the industry insists on porting games to consoles. Or in most cases with even more tragic results, the other way around.
The developers want more money therefore it has to be multiplatform, it is easier to make a version directly 1:1 on all platforms, it is more fair too.
Even PC exclusives aren't using all the hardware available, did Starcraft 2 or Diablo 3 use all the hardware?
Do Paradox use all the extra PC hardware for their PC only games?
No they don't.
Exclusives could have the best graphics technology in it but they usually don't.
Only thing I have seen that has come close is The Witcher 2.
No its not consoles... its developers.
As shown by CD Projeckt
OT. No one platform is superior it is the games that make the platform not the platform.
For example Ps3 has more games I like on it than PC and its region free so I can play games in many different languages/styles and I can import unlike on PC in recent years thanks to STEAM/GFWL/Origin. I live in NZ online store deals make life so much easier
Also I am aware that I can change language options/play different styles of on PC too but the imports are a greater subject here.
Also I like boxes most of the time I hate digital distribution (apart from GoG no DRM soundtracks and wall papers I can make into boxed copies etc) and hope that boxed copies always stay the norm.