inFamous Developer: You Can't Do That on a 360
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
Could you point to me where this main said that "Graphics are the reason why InFamous 2 can't be on 360"?Sh0ckFyre said:
Processing Power =/= Graphical power, it does so much more than just graphics.
As for Crysis 2, different optimization with different hardware. From what I've seen/heard, Crysis 2 on consoles is apparently nothing like the Crysis on the PC, with significant cutbacks on the technology from the original just to squeeze it in on the consoles.
EDIT: And MGS4 graphics on 3DS? Where the hell did you hear that? MGS4 was 1080p with no compression of files filling up the entire Blu-ray disk (about 25GB I think? Don't take my word on that), where the hell did you get that tid-bit of info?
Specialized computers are more expensive than mass produced things, it's the same as scientists and clinics taking apart Wii devices because normally the specialized censors used in the balance board would cost a lot more to produce by hand in a small factory by specialists, but through the wonders of mass production they can be pumped out much much cheaper by nintendo.Korten12 said:
Same deal, PS3 processing power is much cheaper than an equal computer.
not into L4D, hate Halo, not interested in Gears, ME an ME 2, i could get on Steam if i wanted to play them ( PC version is the only version i'd consider due to modding capability :3 ), and i own the PS3 version of prototype, which is disqualified as it not a 360 exclusive and never has been :3. exclusives only dear, that what i wanna hearHG131 said:
they never said graphics they were talking about the power of the engine, to make it run faster, better, put more enemies onscreen, have more environment on screen, graphics too to an extent, but not graphics themselves, it influences the whole experience.Booze Zombie said:
precisely people just free associate graphics with the ps3 not the processing which is the real point that suckerpunch is making.Jumplion said:
Processing power be damned, there is no system out there that can create, write, or QA a game for you and considering how easily and how often people seem to be able to cock all of that up I wouldn't go boasting regarding your level of detail just yet lest hubris bite you in the asterisk.
The amount of ignorance in this thread is astounding, on so so many different levels. Do you guys get pissed off when people totally ignorant on your profession, comment on it like they're experts? Yeah... most of this thread is pretty much that.
That being said, I can't wait for inFamous 2. Just hope the gameplay improvements are as great as the graphics ones, and inFamous 2 is to inFamous as Uncharted 2 was to Uncharted.
That being said, I can't wait for inFamous 2. Just hope the gameplay improvements are as great as the graphics ones, and inFamous 2 is to inFamous as Uncharted 2 was to Uncharted.
To all the people saying they are bullshitting, Uncharted 2 used every single byte of the 25 gigs available on a Blu-Ray. How the hell would they fit that on a DVD? Its just not possible. Just gotta admit, technologically there are somethings the PS3 can do that other consoles cant.
I didn't see any mention of graphics in the statement, why would you task a processor with game code if it's for graphics anyway?Booze Zombie said:
But the PS3 is notorious for being a ***** to code for, compared to the Xbox or Wii, thanks to it's arse backwards architecture.
I dont really care about graphics. well yes if the game looks like it came from before 1995 but now game designers have reached the best we can possibly get for graphics why not make games with actual STORYLINES!!! Also 3D does not look to promising
