GothmogII said:Jim Grim said:I'm sorry, it just seems like the creator of this tasteless garbage has gone out of his way to purposefully offend people, and when questioned responded with "I thought it would be funny." I think there should be an expectation for the guy to give a proper explanation for his actions. But that's just how I feel. Maybe I should just shrug it off, let him do whatever he wants simply because he wants to do it.dogstile said:I don't actually think that last one is a right at all... By all means, dole out criticism as you see fit but there is no law or declaration of rights anywhere that says the creator must respond to such criticism in any capacity.Jim Grim said:Context makes all the difference. What your targets represent is far more important than how they look. The fact that it's not real is beside the point, the player is still encouraged to gain enjoyment from a school shooting.
The idea that people should be allowed to produce whatever material they want and not have to justify it is a horrible idea. What the developer is doing here is communicating an idea to the world, of course he should have to respond to criticism. If you create something so obviously controvesial you can't ignore people's responses to it, and you'd better have some damn good reasoning behind your choice to create it. This guy doesn't have that. It would be better for him and I'm sure for many other people if he simply cancelled the project, though of course if he chooses to go ahead with it, he should have the right to. Equally, I should have the right to complain and protest against this, and I should have the right to a proper response to my criticism.
Oh, and you'd better be prepared to spend a long time arguing this point. You said something very contentious in a public forum, and now you'll see the results.
I don't really see the point in arguing shoulds.
Also, how do you feel about abstraction? If we remove the models used in the mod and replace them with cardboard cutouts with the word student on them, you can argue against that in the same way, right?
On your last point, while the extra realism invovled in shooting at detailed character models of children adds another level to how disturbing the whole thing is, I do think that it's horrifying in a similar way to shoot at targets like that.
Actually, I believe someone on facepunch forums actually emailed a trailer to them.BabySinclair said:Fox News will be on this in 3, 2, 1... "Games are ruining America"
But running over civilians for fun is something at least 90% of GTA players do for fun at some point (oh and in the original top down ones there were side missions where you were given a weapon and told to kill as many innocent people as possible). This guy's just making a game that appeals to that mindset. You may not enjoy it, that doesn't mean other people don't. You may be offended by it, that doesn't mean other people aren't. Remember those mothers that were appalled at dead space 2 claiming it to be made by psychotics and saying it's sick and wrong. This is the same, people just have different limits.Doug said:I'm not even wholly sure what to make of this all; nothing good, certainly, and whilst I accept he has the right to make this ...thing... it doesn't me he's right to do so.
I will say only that the difference as I see it is that running over NPCs in GTA isn't the goal or purpose of the game, whereas this is build from the ground up to be about murdering children and innocents. At least in GTA, the goal was typically to kill other killers, or defend yourself from them.Irridium said:You know, I don't mind the mod. It is not that much different from running over people in GTA. What I have a problem with is how little he cares for the medium, how little he cares for other people's opinions(especially the people who had to live through this stuff), and how much he just doesn't give a shit.
Just a damn disgrace. Thats fine if you don't want games to be more then mindless shooters devoid of anything interesting. But don't fuck it up for the people who want more out of it.
The asshole.
As for the 'developer', I suspect he's just a teen kid, too absorbed in himself and his 'beef with society' to realise the scope of what he's doing; possibly.
This game just makes me feel uncomfortable and just something about it is down right disturbing.Space Spoons said:This guy sounds like a sociopath, and that's not a term I use lightly. I feel sorry for him and everyone around him, because it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that this is going to explode into a firestorm of controversy.
Think about the net benefit to society if this were to happen. That may well be the one positive thing this game has going for it.KeyMaster45 said:Glenn Beck may well die from excitement.
Lordmarkus said:His arguments and responses are sound but creating such a mod are just wrong. Horribly wrong.
Without wishing to label people or judge people I haven't met he sounds like a text book sociopath. He is egocentric, unable to see how this events may have affected others as opposed to himself and appears to lack empathy.TheAmazingHobo said:Reading the interview, the dev appears to have some rather strong opinions about video games and the people who play them. Which is okay and his personal buisness.
He, however, also appears to be COMPLETLY incapable of reflection, considering other peoples viewpoints and emotions or even that he may actually be WRONG about something.
I.e. EXACTLY the type of person who could make such a game and really honestly believe that there is NOTHING wrong with it.
Space Spoons said:This guy sounds like a sociopath, and that's not a term I use lightly. I feel sorry for him and everyone around him, because it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that this is going to explode into a firestorm of controversy.