Internet Archive Founder Hopes To Save Every Book

Earnest Cavalli

New member
Jun 19, 2008
5,352
0
0
Internet Archive Founder Hopes To Save Every Book



Brewster Kahle is a man on a mission. A mission to collect every book ever published, before these literary works are lost to the ravages of time.

Kahle, a computer scientist with a degree from MIT, is most famous as the creator of the Internet Archive, a non-profit group formed in 1996 with a goal of preserving every web page ever created.

In that same archival spirit, Kahle has recently set his sights on preserving the existing written history of mankind, and he's off to a pretty solid start.

To date, Kahle's warehouse in Richmond, California houses 500,000 books. That's a drop in the bucket compared to the 130 million tomes collected by Google in its efforts to digitize the entirety of our literature, but Kahle is heartened by the speed at which his group has been able to accrue their half-million books.

The existence of Google's aforementioned project also causes one to question Kahle's motivations. After all, if we've got the text available online, why keep their archaic dead tree iterations?

"There is always going to be a role for books," Kahle says. "We want to see books live forever."

"Knowledge lives in lots of different forms over time," Kahle adds. "First it was in people's memories, then it was in manuscripts, then printed books, then microfilm, CD-ROMS, now on the digital Internet. Each one of these generations is very important."

The key difference, Kahle says, between his project and something like the Library of Congress is that while the latter is a real library, his project is "more like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, an underground Arctic cavern built to shelter back-up copies of the world's food-crop seeds."

"The books are not meant to be loaned out on a regular basis but protected as authoritative reference copies if the digital version somehow disappears into the cloud or a question ever arises about an e-book's faithfulness to the original printed edition," the AP reports.

While I support the idea of preserving knowledge in any form, I'm not entirely sure that Kahle's project is actually all that necessary. I mean, what sort of catastrophe is going to destroy the massively redundant storage systems Google has its book collection stored on and the Library of Congress and any other such large book collection that we might have to crack open Kahle's vault to get another look at how Ahab finally speared that stupid whale?

By that point, I imagine that whatever took out those other massively well-protected archives will have reduced humanity to carbon and ash.

Source: Yahoo News [http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110801/ap_on_hi_te/us_every_book_written]
(Image [http://www.flickr.com/photos/uitdragerij/3100252985/])

Permalink
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Earnest Cavalli said:
I mean, what sort of catastrophe is going to destroy the massively redundant storage systems Google has its book collection stored on and the Library of Congress and any other such large book collection that we might have to crack open Kahle's vault to get another look at how Ahab finally speared that stupid whale?

Well, we'll always know we have time enough at last to read all those books.

As long as we don't drop our glasses.
 

Nooners

New member
Sep 27, 2009
805
0
0
A good idea. I approve. Now, in the spirit of this week's Extra Punctuation, why not start up archives of everything else? Video games, music, TV shows, comic strips/books, etc.....
 

Jumwa

New member
Jun 21, 2010
641
0
0
You don't see the appeal of having an independent body outside government and the corporate world preserve our art and culture in its original form? History has shown again and again that those two bodies have little compunction about altering history to fit their form. In fact, many philosophers and academics believe that rewriting history is actually a function of government in maintaining society.
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
Wow, this idea's actually pretty cool. And it's a NGO, so it's awesome.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
I can definitely see the need for this. We should always try our best to preserve history, and books are some of our best insights into it. Just cuz we have books on the internet doesn't mean we will in a few thousand years and to preserve the original is always the best way. He has a point, if I really dedicated myself I'm sure I can force the future to believe a sentence or two should be in 1984 that really shouldn't, the internet is a lot easier to mess with than print.
 

infohippie

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,369
0
0
Hawk of Battle said:
What, even the Twilight series? Surely we could, ya know, accidentally forget or delete those right?
"Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat It" - and that's why we really do need to keep a copy of Twilight archived.
 

esplode

New member
Dec 17, 2008
47
0
0
Does anyone else see it as ironic that a computer scientist that went to MIT wants to save physical books despite them being saved digitally? It does sound like a good idea though.
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
Nice idea but I dunno how much safer it will be than having everything digitized. The point of the Svalbard Seed Vault is to protect everything in case it goes extinct. This is doing the same thing, but so is Google. A fire wiping out his warehouse is, at the moment, far more likely than losing the digital copies (assuming Google has several back ups, which I cannot imagine the do not). Granted this gives two versions.