- Mar 17, 2012
- 5,950
- 14
- 43
- Country
- United States
Thoughts? This could be huge if this happens and reinforces the "archive EVERYTHING" mentality I have.
You can only get away with publishing other peoples' stuff for so long in the digital age. I think its called the eBaum's World EffectInternet Archive did a very helpful, noble, and explicitly illegal thing, in such a way that required publishers to sue or lose the ability to control their digital distribution.
It's classed as an online library, so like a regular library, it can "lend out" digital goods.So, can anyone usefully explain why in heaven's name the IA decided to do that? I mean, it strikes me as phenomenally stupid, despite the good intentions.
I think I just felt myself age twenty years.eBaum's World
Well, it should probably restructure itself to be like an actual archive. You can go there, you can observe the material. Even experience it. But it does not leave the four walls of the archive.It's classed as an online library, so like a regular library, it can "lend out" digital goods.
Unfortunately, it didn't actually have the authority to lend out unlimited numbers of digital goods like it thought it did.
Sure. But, this strikes me as a pretty basic thing to not notice. Even with my hardly vast job experience in middling organisational seniority, the first question I'd be asking about making shedloads of copyrighted material accessible free over the net is "Have we cleared this with legal?"Unfortunately, it didn't actually have the authority to lend out unlimited numbers of digital goods like it thought it did.