I'm sure most who frequent forums like this have come across the use of 'But white people were slaves so shut up about African slaves' defense. We all know how to respond. The fact that the modern Irish american descendants of slaves have integrated themselves as successfully as those Irish who emigrated willingly is irrelevant when speaking about black issues unique to black people. As an Irishman I can move to the states tomorrow and expect to be treated better than someone who was born in the country, because I'm white, simple as. It truly irritates me then when some asshole tries to use my people's (I know how that sounds, but its relevant here) history to dismiss some other person's history. The whole 'Irish people got over slavery, so why can't black people?' is a childish derailment technique at best, and I'm glad most can recognize and dismiss it immediately.
But dismissing the argument and dismissing the history are two very different things. Depressingly, many seem to believe that Irish slaves were somehow treated more humanely than African slaves because of some race loyalty between them and the invariably white slavers, untrue. Many more believe that Irish slavery never happened, or employ the euphemism 'indentured servitude' to take the sting out. This is troubling. Hundreds and thousands of people lived and died as slaves and their existence is routinely denied by 'progressive' and 'liberal' advocates for the purpose of depriving their enemies of a rhetorical device. Genocide is minimized out of convenience, laziness and ignorance by the very same people who make it their duty to highlight uncomfortable and inconvenient truth. This is a gross hypocrisy I have yet to see acknowledged here on the escapist.
The express purpose of sending Irish slaves off to Barbados and Virginia was to 'delete' these people, remove the Irish natives of Ireland, and make way for English Protestant plantations. History was supposed to forget that they had lived, their obscurity is a success of genocide. Lucky for us then the English have done a terrible job of hiding this purpose. You too can google the endless documented correspondences referencing killing nits so they do not grow to lice and righteous judgment of God upon these barbarous wretches. And while the ethnic cleansing of Ireland is a hotly divisive topic in the UK and Northern Ireland, with many Oliver Cromwell apologists citing the few times he referred to 'inhabitant casualties' in a way that suggested they were human, I do in fact believe that these events took place, that the perpetrators through their own written admission were operating under an assumptions of racial superiority, and that something very very wrong happened and people are pretending it didn't.
To win internet fights.
The saddest part might be that here in the republic of Ireland we actually couldn't give a fuck about the Irish slaves. There's only 400 redlegs left in Barbados out of the original 50'000 slave shipment. http://www.sligoheritage.com/archBarbados.htm I can't claim to be descended from those people. I don't get angry or sad when I think about them. it was a long time ago and they're far far away. But they at least deserve to be acknowledged to exist. And not laughed at as fabrications dreamth up by some self-pitying racist.
But dismissing the argument and dismissing the history are two very different things. Depressingly, many seem to believe that Irish slaves were somehow treated more humanely than African slaves because of some race loyalty between them and the invariably white slavers, untrue. Many more believe that Irish slavery never happened, or employ the euphemism 'indentured servitude' to take the sting out. This is troubling. Hundreds and thousands of people lived and died as slaves and their existence is routinely denied by 'progressive' and 'liberal' advocates for the purpose of depriving their enemies of a rhetorical device. Genocide is minimized out of convenience, laziness and ignorance by the very same people who make it their duty to highlight uncomfortable and inconvenient truth. This is a gross hypocrisy I have yet to see acknowledged here on the escapist.
The express purpose of sending Irish slaves off to Barbados and Virginia was to 'delete' these people, remove the Irish natives of Ireland, and make way for English Protestant plantations. History was supposed to forget that they had lived, their obscurity is a success of genocide. Lucky for us then the English have done a terrible job of hiding this purpose. You too can google the endless documented correspondences referencing killing nits so they do not grow to lice and righteous judgment of God upon these barbarous wretches. And while the ethnic cleansing of Ireland is a hotly divisive topic in the UK and Northern Ireland, with many Oliver Cromwell apologists citing the few times he referred to 'inhabitant casualties' in a way that suggested they were human, I do in fact believe that these events took place, that the perpetrators through their own written admission were operating under an assumptions of racial superiority, and that something very very wrong happened and people are pretending it didn't.
To win internet fights.
The saddest part might be that here in the republic of Ireland we actually couldn't give a fuck about the Irish slaves. There's only 400 redlegs left in Barbados out of the original 50'000 slave shipment. http://www.sligoheritage.com/archBarbados.htm I can't claim to be descended from those people. I don't get angry or sad when I think about them. it was a long time ago and they're far far away. But they at least deserve to be acknowledged to exist. And not laughed at as fabrications dreamth up by some self-pitying racist.