I think "reboot" is being thrown around very liberally here. But for the above examples:
-Stargate: I'm meh about it. The thing is, on the one hand, I like SG-1 (and Universe, not so much Atlantis). On the other, it always felt like less of a continuation of the movie and more its own thing. Never mind that SG-1 retconned the novels and comics that followed the movie in its own timeframe, never mind that it changed details from said movie (e.g. making Abydos the closest planet to Earth rather than in the Kalim galaxy, not to mention the whole goa'uld/Jaffa thing), but the tone feels different, the characters feel different, it feels...well, different. Not saying this is bad, and part of the reason I like Universe is that it actually did do things differently rather than being a palatte swap like Atlantis was. So, I'm actually optimistic about the Stargate films. I'd like to see Stargate films done in the style of the original, which, as solid as SG-1 was, was most certainly not in the same style.
-Star Wars: Retconned, not rebooted (referring to the EU). Yeah, it sucks, but I can live with it.
-Fantastic 4: Less a reboot, and more "we need to keep the rights." I'm not denying reboots can be cynical in their intent, but Fox's cynicism actually goes a step beyond. And this is from someone who actually found things to like in said film, even though it's a broken one for all intents and purposes.
-Star Trek: Not a reboot. Star Trek 2009 is to Star Trek Prime what SG-1 is to the original movie - a jumping off point to do something different, only with the levels of fan favor reversed. But Star Trek is still going in the Prime universe (e.g. STO), and Star Trek allows the provision for alternate universes (e.g. the mirror universe), even if time travel hasn't previously created a new reality (to my knowledge). And speaking personally, I like the two Abrams films. They were my first proper introduction to the setting, and were a gateway for me getting into the old shows (e.g. TNG and TOS). Beyond looks like utter bollocks, but if you operate under the principle that the Abramsverse was made to attract people not previously into Star Trek, then, castrate me if you want, but I'm one of the dirty pleebs that it succeeded in sucking in.
-X-Men: Not a follower of the films, but does it really count as a reboot? The timeline had a number done on it, but it was done in an in-universe manner.
-Batman: We went from Batman and Robin to the Nolan trilogy. I dare anyone to call that a negative. However, does this count as a reboot? Comics have multiple takes on the same character. Branching out a bit, suppose another adaptation of Lord of the Rings came out. Would it be a reboot of Jackson's films? No, anymore than the Jackson films were a reboot of the Bashki version. Same source material, different interpretation.
-James Bond: We went from Die Another Day to the likes of Casino Royale, Skyfall, and yes, even Spectre (sorry QoS). Honestly, I can't fault this move at all given the results we got.
-Spider-Man: I don't really consider a reboot, in the same vein that, like Batman, it's a different story in a new setting on the same character. That said, ASM1 was utter tripe (never saw its sequel), so I call this a negative (on the other hand, I don't think the Rami trilogy needed continuation - it ended at a perfect point to end the overall story). And since Spidey's found his way into the clutches of the MCU...sigh...
But the Rami films were kickass. Even if the weakest of the trilogy, I even like Spider-Man 3 as a net positive.
-Terminator: Genisys is an odd one. It's clearly not in the same timeline as T3/4. Yet in a hypothetical sequence of T1-2-Genisys, it doesn't quite match up either. Even John saving Kyle differs from how Reese puts it in T1. Since it's well established that the Terminator series has multiple timelines, I actually see Genisys as more of a side story. Its own timeline which spawns a separate timeline, completely separate from anything else. Yes, the same events occur, but not in the same continuity, if that makes sense.
And, unpopular opinion time, I loved it. Heck, I hold it as being the third best in the series after T2 and T1. Yeah, in an ideal world there'd be a proper finish within the movies to the saga, but taking Genisys by itself, separate from them, I thought it was good. And we've seen Skynet be defeated in EU material before, so I can live without seeing it in the movies.
-Superman: Again, not calling this a reboot per se, due to how comic movies work (multiple tellings of the same story). This being a reference to Man of Steel...um...I thought it was okay. Yes, in the realm of fan wars that wage to this day, I'm plonked in the middle. Still enjoyed it though, but when the only other Superman films I've seen were SM4 and Returns, well, guess I don't have much to compare it to.
