so do iZhukov said:I find the idea of a perfectly sane guy who chooses to act like that for unfathomable reasons to be cooler, scarier and more interesting than a guy who just acts like that because he's crackers.
Although the argument could be made that having unfathomable motives is the same as being insane.
The question is: What kind of insane is he and just how insane is he? Ive seen pleanty of batman shows with the Joker, and he seems to shift from one degree to another, sometimes even several times per show.Zhukov said:I find the idea of a perfectly sane guy who chooses to act like that for unfathomable reasons to be cooler, scarier and more interesting than a guy who just acts like that because he's crackers.
Although the argument could be made that having unfathomable motives is the same as being insane.
It depends on what you mean by "insanity." As someone else pointed out, that's not a medical term; it's a legal one. It describes someone who suffers from a mental disease or defect that renders him incapable of appreciating the consequences of his actions and therefore unable to form the intent to commit a criminal act. Like Hannibal Lecter, I just don't think the Joker fits the bill. He's able to make far-reaching, complicated, and effective plans, which tends to rule out most mental diseases or defects, and he uses these plans to avoid capture, which is a dead giveaway of consciousness of guilt.ruedyn said:There was a debate that he isn't? He dresses up like a clown and kills people, fighting a guy dressed up as a bat (sort of, I never saw the resemblance). I'd say they're all nutty as squirrel shit, except Commissioner Gordon.
^ThisAsita said:One could also say that the very act of choosing to act that way makes a better case for him being insane than almost any other argument could. It's a question of who's crazier: The man locked up in an asylum, or the man who breaks in and pretends to be an inmate?Zhukov said:I find the idea of a perfectly sane guy who chooses to act like that for unfathomable reasons to be cooler, scarier and more interesting than a guy who just acts like that because he's crackers.
Although the argument could be made that having unfathomable motives is the same as being insane.
Zack Alklazaris said:I think he's a sociopath more than a psychopath. A psychopath kills for pleasure for the fun of it. The joker seems more controlled than that. He wants to create chaos, panic, and drag people down to his level. That requires intelligent reasoning, which is something a psychopath wouldn't be able to hold on to. They would become overpowered by their impulses.
Wikipedia on Psychopathy said:Psychopathy is a personality disorder that has been variously described as characterized by shallow emotions (in particular reduced fear), stress tolerance, lacking empathy, coldheartedness, lacking guilt, egocentricity, superficial charm, manipulativeness, irresponsibility, nonplanfulness, impulsivity, and antisocial behaviors such as parasitic lifestyle and criminality
Wikipedia on Sociopathy said:It is characterized by at least 3 of the following:
Callous unconcern for the feelings of others.
Gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social norms, rules, and obligations.
Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them.
Very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence.
Incapacity to experience guilt or to profit from experience, particularly punishment.
Markedly prone to blame others or to offer plausible rationalizations for the behavior that has brought the person into conflict with society.