dscross said:
I've never played Outbreak. Worth it?
I'm mixed on Outbreak myself. Outbreak and Outbreak File 2 take the #10 and 11 RE positions for me respectively. There's a lot going for it, but a lot against it as well.
On the one hand, Outbreak (and by Outbreak I mean both games, File 2 is basically just an expansion for the first) is perhaps the most survival horror-esque game in the series. I mean, sure, the series is survival horror in of itself, but Outbreak goes a step beyond. The game's tough - enemies keep coming, ammo is very scarce, you have to rely on every day items a lot, and the characters are average joes caught up in the Raccoon City Outbreak. Each character also has unique pros and cons, and while none of them are particuarly deep, they do each have their own personality.
On the other hand, Outbreak suffers in the presentation department. There's a bit of an overall story (more so in File 1, in File 2 the scenarios are far less connected), but really it's just a bunch of scenarios thrown together with hardly anything linking them. The graphics are pretty under-par, even for the era, and if you're invested in the overall story of Resident Evil, Outbreak is almost completely tangental. It doesn't really tell us anything that we didn't already know, and to my knowledge, only one of the playable characters has ever been referenced outside the game. It also doesn't help that the voice acting and computer AI are wonky, and that the PS2 no longer has online play.
To be honest, Outbreak would benefit a lot more from a remake than RE2, but as it is, it's kind of a flawed gem. I think there's great potential in Outbreak's style of gameplay, but taking it as it is, it's an enjoyable, albeit flawed game.