LOL nice onebfgmetalhead said:really jack? here's a cheat code for ya:
FIRST:grab controller(aka dagger),place above heart
SECOND:enter this combination up,down...... thats it
this code sends you to hell recomended for retarded govenment guys ONLY
Okay, if you didn't understand what I meant then there is really no speaking with you, because all you're doing is turning this into a pissing contest while refusing to understand exactly what I meant. I didn't mean that there wasn't anyone that was still scarred by WW2, just that there were a lot less, and if you didn't understand that, I'm sorry that I may have mistyped.ShadowsofHope said:Many of the Holocaust survivors still alive would likely want a word with you on that..Johnnyallstar said:Because, unlike WW2 and nazis, there are still a lot of people it's very painful to.InterAirplay said:Just getting hypothetical here for the sake of discussion - if we already know how that process works, then why not simply say "well, this will be acceptable eventually, so why not now?"Johnnyallstar said:Yes, time does matter, but that's still beside the point of being right or not. Alan Alda said, in a Woody Allen movie, that comedy is pain plus time. The acceptability of jokes about tragedy are never funny immediately following the pain, but given time can be accepted. The same could be said about war.InterAirplay said:*Snip
Is it too soon to have a simulator where you act like a terrorist hijacking one of the 9/11 attack planes? I say it is. Though there are people out there questioning if it's been long enough, and are entertaining the idea.
I didn't mean that nobody in the world felt pain from it anymore, but was more drawing to the fact that there are millions more who suffer from the current events. And the wounds are much more fresh. I wasn't intending for anyone to think that there wasn't one soul in the world that feels pain from it. If you really think I felt that way, I'm sorry for mistyping, and sorry that you didn't really see what I was trying to say.InterAirplay said:I find the notion that WWII is not painful to anyone anymore to be completely ridiculous. It probably causes a great deal of pain to a lot of people who never even participated, let alone survived or (or suffered injuries from it). If people are suffering pain from a current war, surely they can allow the pain and the game to go seperately, and we can all have faith that this person will not play the game? and what the hell makes it OK to show it in films, by that logic?Johnnyallstar said:Because, unlike WW2 and nazis, there are still a lot of people it's very painful to.InterAirplay said:Just getting hypothetical here for the sake of discussion - if we already know how that process works, then why not simply say "well, this will be acceptable eventually, so why not now?"Johnnyallstar said:Yes, time does matter, but that's still beside the point of being right or not. Alan Alda said, in a Woody Allen movie, that comedy is pain plus time. The acceptability of jokes about tragedy are never funny immediately following the pain, but given time can be accepted. The same could be said about war.InterAirplay said:*Snip
Is it too soon to have a simulator where you act like a terrorist hijacking one of the 9/11 attack planes? I say it is. Though there are people out there questioning if it's been long enough, and are entertaining the idea.
Contest? Someone has some rather interesting preconceptions..Johnnyallstar said:Okay, if you didn't understand what I meant then there is really no speaking with you, because all you're doing is turning this into a pissing contest while refusing to understand exactly what I meant. I didn't mean that there wasn't anyone that was still scarred by WW2, just that there were a lot less, and if you didn't understand that, I'm sorry that I may have mistyped.ShadowsofHope said:Many of the Holocaust survivors still alive would likely want a word with you on that..Johnnyallstar said:Because, unlike WW2 and nazis, there are still a lot of people it's very painful to.InterAirplay said:Just getting hypothetical here for the sake of discussion - if we already know how that process works, then why not simply say "well, this will be acceptable eventually, so why not now?"Johnnyallstar said:Yes, time does matter, but that's still beside the point of being right or not. Alan Alda said, in a Woody Allen movie, that comedy is pain plus time. The acceptability of jokes about tragedy are never funny immediately following the pain, but given time can be accepted. The same could be said about war.InterAirplay said:*Snip
Is it too soon to have a simulator where you act like a terrorist hijacking one of the 9/11 attack planes? I say it is. Though there are people out there questioning if it's been long enough, and are entertaining the idea.
Money on Palin. xDZuljeet said:OK, Sarah Palin v. Jack Thompson to the death: who wins?