James Bond Watch Fetches Surprise Fortune on eBay

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
James Bond Watch Fetches Surprise Fortune on eBay


A man who listed his beat-up old watch on eBay for ten bucks was shocked to discover that it was an extremely rare Rolex model that appeared in classic James Bond films and was actually worth a big pile of cash.

Back in the late 50s, a U.S. Navy man by the name of Bob purchased a watch from the Navy Exchange on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. He didn't buy it because it was a classy Rolex, but because he needed a dive watch to time his air reserves and that's what the store happened to have in stock. He blew $70 on it, a fairly hefty price tag at the time; his wife, apparently, was not happy.

Bob wore that old watch for 35 years before finally retiring it to a drawer, where it sat for another decade. Then, a couple of weeks ago, he decided to list a few of his things on eBay, maybe for a little extra cash to blow on Christmas gifts. Whatever the reason, he obviously wasn't expecting much because he started the bidding on his banged-up timepiece at $9.95.

He began to grow suspicious after bidding broke the $30,000 mark. Yes, that's thirty thousand dollars. He and his son did some research and came up with a startling discovery: this wasn't just any old dive watch, this was a Rolex Submariner Ref 5510, described by Thunderball [http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/12/08/rolex-owner-gets-a-christmas-surprise-posted-his-watch-on-ebay-for-9-95-final-bid-was-60000/].

Bob acknowledged in the auction listing that he doesn't have any of the original papers, which makes sense in light of the fact that he wasn't treating it as an investment, so in lieu of that he provided a less precise but far more personal provenance for collectors: photos of himself wearing it throughout the years, including a rather bizarre shot taken at what appears to be some kind of party with Christopher Reeve, aka Superman [http://www.amazon.com/Superman-Movie-Blu-ray-Christopher-Reeve/dp/B000K4X5XA/ref=sr_1_3?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1291913070&sr=1-3], doing the dishes.

In the auction listing [http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rt=nc&nma=true&item=120652944121&si=YZGIC80Vp%252FkUT841Qbv8vcwQ%252B8g%253D&viewitem=], Bob said he and his wife are downsizing and that he hoped to be able to get $50 or $100 for the thing. The final selling price when the auction closed on December 4: $66,100. Nice.

Source: Hodinkee [http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/2010/12/6/interview-the-man-behind-the-most-talked-about-ebay-listing.html]


Permalink
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
Holy... Shit...

Thirty thousand for a James Bond prop?

This literally robbed me of words IRL.
 

maddog015

New member
Sep 12, 2008
338
0
0
Cid SilverWing said:
Holy... Shit...

Thirty thousand for a James Bond prop?

This literally robbed me of words IRL.
It's not a prop. It's the type of watch that was used in the movie.
 

Credge

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,042
0
0
Misleading article is misleading.

The watch is rare to begin with. It really has little to do with it being a James Bond watch. It was also not a prop, which the article lead me to believe.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Cid SilverWing said:
Holy... Shit...

Thirty thousand for a James Bond prop?

This literally robbed me of words IRL.
You didn't finish reading, it sold for over 60,000.
 

Brotherofwill

New member
Jan 25, 2009
2,566
0
0
I love the bidding history.

9.95$
10$
11$
12$
OVEEEEEEEEEEEEEERR 9000000000000000$$$$$$$$$$$$$
66.100$. Sold.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Far too many puns to do a proper "Horatio" on this but I'm sure someone will add some. Just goes to show you the value of those old "antiques".
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,594
0
0
Straying Bullet said:
The double of the inital bid. Nice.
More than that. First bid: $10.95. Second bid: $11.95. Third bid: $1,000. And it rocketed from there.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Credge said:
The watch is rare to begin with. It really has little to do with it being a James Bond watch. It was also not a prop, which the article lead me to believe.
This may come as a surprise to you, but most of our readers aren't watch nerds and have no idea what a Rolex Submariner Ref 5510 is. But it's the one Sean Connery wore in Goldfinger? That's something we can relate to.
 

Gilhelmi

The One Who Protects
Oct 22, 2009
1,480
0
0
One mans junk that his wife complains about. Another mans, who is very wealthy, treasure. I bet his wife wont be complaining about him buying her something with the money they just made.
 

Phat32

New member
Jul 16, 2009
4
0
0
For the people who want a more impressive number, That guy got 94,428.57% of what he spent for the watch