I'm kinda scared atm cause seeing that guy blow his brains out didn't effect me at all. I'm not saying movies and VG have desevtised me. But I guess seeing it on a screem instead of face to face makes it unreal to me
I think I know why it's not destibing to me. I saw 2 planes run into buildings for 5 months over and over and over and saw a man jumping out a 100 story building over and over. I think Jim is right the violance in the News is fucking us up more than a VG or fiction.KiloFox said:i actually do wanna know why. when he pulled out the gun everyone freaked, but it looked like he was gonna try and demonstrate a point but never got around to it. i would like some context.Hazzard said:Do you reckon you could edit it what the graphic content is in the description so people know what it is?
Can someone explain to me what the purpose of what happened in the content was? As in why the person did it?
OT though, i actually wasn't disturbed at all on the footage. he pulled the gun, people freaked, he looked like he was trying to calm them down to explain something, they got louder, he shot himself. i had the same expression the entire time, and i didn't really feel any different before, after, or during. now i'm not gonna claim that games desensitized me to violence, that's bullshit. i'm just broken in the head naturally and i know that. in fact, i have the intelligence to hide it most of the time and never do anything about it. and just because i, in particular, wasn't disturbed, dosn't mean that nobody else was. i am not a representation of the rest of gamers, and neither is anyone else who plays games then goes out killing people. they're just a small minority of people who are already broken, but just happen to play games. i'm just smart enough not to go bat-shit insane and do something stupid like that. i enjoy living free to play my games and be my weird-ass self.
Not overlooked.dfphetteplace said:I'm not going to go through the 400 and some comments on this thread, but I am going to add my 2 cents (which will probably be buried and no one will read). I'm a firefighter/paramedic. I have seen death. I've seen a child die. I've been the one to pronounce the time of death for a 10 year old girl that was violently killed. I think about her every day.
I've seen a wife run over by her husband 3 times. I've done CPR on a 3 month old. I've pulled a man out of an ice covered river. I've seen a child die from abuse. I've had to testify in court over the physical and sexual abuse of a 4 year boy that would have continued had I not reported and documented all of it. I've had to remove a suicide victim from his semi truck that shot himself twice, first in the head, and then the chest (he lived through the first shot).
I have played games as long as I can remember. I played the first Mortal Kombat when it came out, and have played tons of "violent" video games since. So I have seen real death, and also the video game stuff. I couldn't watch the video of the man killing himself. I had no interest in watching it. I have seen enough death in real life, up close and personal, and don't want to see anymore unless I have to. I don't even like to see it on shows like Law and Order, CSI, Criminal Minds, or any of the other ones.
I am currently playing Sleeping Dogs, and I just finished Saints Row The Third. Video games to not bother me, at all. Like Jim said, it is over the top fake cartoon violence. I am disgusted by these pundits who say video games cause violence. Now, do I let my small child watch me play some games? No. He doesn't need to see it, even if it is over the top, because I think my son is too young to see anything like that so far. But I am not going to keep the stuff from him forever (he is a preschooler if you are curious).
Like I said, I'm a paramedic, and I do not like to see death. Not real death, at least. I have no problem with people that have died natural deaths, and I can, for the most part, handle most stuff without a second thought. I have had people hang themselves, overdose, ect. Those don't bother me that much. I find nothing fascinating about a violent death, though. If I could stop thinking about that little girl, I would.
I have played "violent" video games for close to 20 years now. I have no problem shooting someone in the head in TF2, or crushing someone under an engine block in Sleeping Dogs. I have seen both of those things happen in real life, and there is no comparison. They are completely different. One is a cartoon, the other is the end of someones life.
I couldn't watch the coverage of the Sandy Hook shooting. I cried when I heard about it. I can not look at the pictures of the victims. I cried not just for the kids that died, but for the children that survived, and the parents of both, and the EMS, fire, and police that responded to that call. The EMS station was next door to the school. I know that would have been my last day on the job.
I hope this gives someone pause if they think that video games desensitize people to real life violence.
Man that was disturbing. It reminds me of some footage from police dashcam where the policeman stops a pickup truck on some US highway. The policeman approaches the driver's side, and the driver comes out. He's dressed like a Vietnam veteran. Things go sour, and the cop shows incredible restraint when the man reaches into his pickup to pull out a rifle. A firefight ensues. You don't actually see much of the violence, but you can hear it. The police officer takes a few hits, and goes to hide behind his squad car. You can hear him screaming for backup. You can tell he is wounded pretty badly as well. The assailant walks towards the officer, and you can hear the policeman beg for his life. And you hear another gunshot, and it's silent. I enjoy all manner of violent video games, but that video shook me to the core. I'll never forget it.Jimothy Sterling said:Desensitized to Violence
Description: Warning -- Contains graphic content. If you don't want to see disturbing Internet things, skip the footage starting at 1:20 and ending at 1:49.
As the mainstream news media continues to revel in the Sandy Hook shootings, its pundits point at the finger at videogames for reveling in digital violence. If you believe these hypocrites, your gaming hobby makes you cold and indifferent to scenes of death and destruction. If you believe the Jimquisition - and you should, for its word is law - you'll know that's bollocks.
Watch Video
No man is an island,Wesley Brannock said:The point to " inform " the people has long since left the media now its about making killers famous REAL killers mind you not fictional ones. If " informing " now a days means constantly covering a story to the point of harassing the families of murder victims then yes they are " informing ". If " informing " means that your going to turn everything you don't approve of into a WITCH HUNT because something " newsworthy " happened then yes they are " informing ". If " informing " means telling people that the guns , video games , or whatever is to blame then yes they are " informing ". If " informing " means covering only one story of lives being lost all week long then yes they are " informing ". The line between " informing " and glorifying is thin. However on a almost daily basis is being stomped on , spit on by the very people to whom are SUPPOSED to uphold it. My way of confirming this is the FACT in less then ten minutes they managed to politicize it. They politicized it by pointing a finger at everyone but the killer. I can't take the view point of a " news " company seriously when they cover a school shooting and follow it by saying. " This is responsible for the mass killing is ( enter preference ) instead of the shooter ". That person who shot up the school was to blame for the incident yet they will instead blame whatever scapegoat they can find. While people will call it " informing " when instead it simply a format for demonizing that to which had no part in any wrong doing. Tell me did a video game pull the trigger or a PERSON. Did the gun pull its own trigger or did that require a PERSON. Did the entire society kill those kids or did one PERSON do it. All I blame the media for is turning the killer into a star of sorts. People that do horrible things should be forgotten in time while the teachers that used their own bodies to shield the children from a rain of bullets should be remember for their bravery. Yet most people can only remember the name and face of the shooter. Why ? Simple the " news " wanted to " inform " people. ( This is the one and only response I will do. )Mr F. said:Guh.Wesley Brannock said:While I didn't like the suicide part I see why Jimothy Sterling used it. He wanted to show the point that real violence was different then video game violence by showing the difference not in a verbal way thats been argued a hundred times over. But in a visual way an effective way. I for one would defend the way in which it is. Why ? Simple for once the news ( to whom shows real violence all the time ) is being shown that the community at large does in fact despise real violence. I for one wouldn't be surprised if members of the site wanted this to be taken down for said reason. In that light we can't be the one's " glorifying " violence it would be C.N.N , Fox news , and other " news " outlets onto which show real violence as the " glorifiers " of violence. Besides here is one question I'd like answered by the media. Which news outlet released the killers face first video game sites or traditional news outlets ?
My girlfriend pointed me towards the video (And the thread) based on the logic that she would get to see some wonderful, wonderful rage on my part. She does so love my rants.
Gonna jump over your first arguments and strait to your assumptions that in comparison to games, it is the News media that glorifies violence. If informing people of a situation is the glorification of a situation, then I glorify racism. I am currently glorifying in the mire of Sociology (As I am being informed of a situation). The authors who write books glorify the subject matter of the book, regardless of what the book is about. I glorify the act of rape because a poem I once wrote got into a book about dealing with rape. Huh. Your logic is broken.
See, that is all I am picking apart here. Yes, the news media shows "Real" violence whilst gamers dont have to deal with real violence. Yet one is to inform (And entertain, to a degree, depends on the news outlet) and the other is to purely entertain. I don't watch the news (Or read it, as is more common with me) because I love seeing the corpses of young Syrian men. I watch it because I wish to remain informed as to the hell these people are going through.
Finally, the question you wish to ask the media:
Of course it was the fucking news media that released his face first. Gaming websites do not cover that kind of story, gaming websites do not have the resources to cover that kind of story. You might as well say "I want to know which media showed fight scenes from Soul Calibur" and use that as proof that gaming media is more violent then the reverse.
This argument is not as simple as Jim would like to argue. But I wont drag myself into the mire of this thread.
Just pick apart a single post, point out the mistakes in the logic and the central argument, and then step out.
I've got to say I agree, Spec Ops: The Line made me feel bad and I play Halo a lot -not exactly the most realistic shooter on the planet but it still made me question my enjoyment of it. I felt very drained when I completed spec ops the first time round. At the end I couldn't decide at the end there is a choice that after the whole story made me question many things and I didn't play any shooters for while after that. The odd thing about spec ops is it's game play isn't unique and has the pretty much standard shooter graphics of this generation but there are the harrowing details like fallen enemies writhing around the floor in pain (an issue I had with GTA4 amplified) that make it so effective and unlike many video games the consequences impact on the character and you.lax4life said:You know, I think that you can find gamers feel uncomfortable with violence in video games too. I know for a fact that I felt like shit with Spec Ops: The Line, and all of my friends who I got to play with, who all play "violent video games" on a pretty regular basis, said that it was fucked up.
If presented well, violence in video games, even though it will never be as realistic and be a little cartoony in comparison to real life, can still make you feel bad.
you have a very good point sir, and i believe that's a point that Jim was trying to get accross in his video.Brad Gardner said:I think I know why it's not destibing to me. I saw 2 planes run into buildings for 5 months over and over and over and saw a man jumping out a 100 story building over and over. I think Jim is right the violance in the News is fucking us up more than a VG or fiction.KiloFox said:i actually do wanna know why. when he pulled out the gun everyone freaked, but it looked like he was gonna try and demonstrate a point but never got around to it. i would like some context.Hazzard said:Do you reckon you could edit it what the graphic content is in the description so people know what it is?
Can someone explain to me what the purpose of what happened in the content was? As in why the person did it?
OT though, i actually wasn't disturbed at all on the footage. he pulled the gun, people freaked, he looked like he was trying to calm them down to explain something, they got louder, he shot himself. i had the same expression the entire time, and i didn't really feel any different before, after, or during. now i'm not gonna claim that games desensitized me to violence, that's bullshit. i'm just broken in the head naturally and i know that. in fact, i have the intelligence to hide it most of the time and never do anything about it. and just because i, in particular, wasn't disturbed, dosn't mean that nobody else was. i am not a representation of the rest of gamers, and neither is anyone else who plays games then goes out killing people. they're just a small minority of people who are already broken, but just happen to play games. i'm just smart enough not to go bat-shit insane and do something stupid like that. i enjoy living free to play my games and be my weird-ass self.
The 9/11 footage is some of the most horrible footage ever, seeing those planes hitting the building knowing they are full of hundreds of people. Knowing that the towers are full of thousands of people, even worse knowing everyone above the impact has no way of escaping.Brad Gardner said:I think I know why it's not destibing to me. I saw 2 planes run into buildings for 5 months over and over and over and saw a man jumping out a 100 story building over and over. I think Jim is right the violance in the News is fucking us up more than a VG or fiction.
Morbid curiosity. It's incredibly strange yet very common, people like to look at death and extreme injuries. Especially if it's something shocking and uncommon like watching someone commit suicide, then of course add in that it may also be so shocking that it could have been thought to be a joke and looking closer allows the reality of what happened to set in.Nash said:Well, frankly I can't understand why any human being would want to get a clearer shot of it.