Jimquisition: Fee-to-Pay and the Death of Dignity

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
Fee-to-Pay and the Death of Dignity

Jimquisition revisits the subject of Fee to Pay, because Jim's in a bad mood and feels like kicking at unscrupulous, utterly undignified videogame publishers. Again.

Watch Video
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
I don't have the same faith in the market you do, but if all these bubbles do burst and these fat bloated companies do suffer for it it'll be a very good day indeed.
 

synobal

New member
Jun 8, 2011
2,189
0
0
Don't give up Jim, fight the power man. I ultimately agree the market will fix itself, unless it works and then it will be sad.
 

Ken_J

New member
Jun 4, 2009
891
0
0
I think this is one of those times that Nintendo's bubble that it makes for it self really helps. I don't see them even attempting this kinda shit.
 

MonkeyPunch

New member
Feb 20, 2008
589
0
0
Actually agree with everything you said there. There's literally nothing I disagree with there, except that I think that bubble will crash in quite a while, rather than sooner unfortunately.
I actually think the Xbox One looks like a decent piece of kit - just that all the games pre-fitted with those micro transaction shenanigans makes me be a little bit sick in my mouth.
Good show.
Could only add to it but I'm bored of ranting on this subject.

Also... I can see why that Alien cuddly toy is everything to you. I want one too.

[edit] Hang on! How did I not know about The Dismal Jesters! I was refreshing the Podtoid page for like the last month.
 

cefm

New member
Mar 26, 2010
380
0
0
Let's not forget that this ass-hattery being felched upon us by the game manufacturers is so transparently fake and greedy that it will only serve to "legitimize" the illegal pirating industry. I firmly agree that pirating is illegal and cannot be morally or ethically justified - but the more the "legal" options are revealed to be a scam and an inconvenience, the less surprised I'll be when pirating takes over.
 

kotetamer

New member
Dec 2, 2013
1
0
0
I find it interesting that in a discussion panel recently the former president of THQ and Naughty Dog Jason Rubin said that Nintendo is no longer relevant when it comes to hardware and should just publish on other platforms. The same was said by a few others, Pachter being one of them as well. They seem to be one of the few companies not delving into this sort of practice of micro transactions or DLC that's made from the start of the game's development. Maybe it's a sign of the times where this sort of thing should just be expected and it's bull. I can only hope that Jim is right and this bubble will burst, so far the games on ps4 and xbox one don't look to change this.
 

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
Dragon's Dogma had in game ads? They couldn't have been very effective, because I seem to have mentally blocked them out.
 

Rawbeard

New member
Jan 28, 2010
224
0
0
Personally I hope more companies crash and burn like THQ, so I praise Fee-to-Pay as a possible herald of the end of those fuckheads. Not going to happen, but I can dream.
 

Mr. Omega

ANTI-LIFE JUSTIFIES MY HATE!
Jul 1, 2010
3,902
0
0
Wow... I knew about Ryse, but I didn't think it was that bad. Like Jim said, people eventually reach their breaking point. I've reached mine with the AAA industry. The 4 games I've been playing the most recently have been Mario 3D World, Payday 2, Civ 5, and Pokemon X. Not a single micro-transaction to be found.

Speaking of, I remember playing through Mario 3D World and joking to myself all of the ways they could have worked in microtransactions. Need more green stars? get the Captain Toad level packs and Mystery House bundle! The main 4 not doing things for you? Preorder and get the bonus character! Beat the game? Pay $5 for Star World! It all just reminds me of Capcom selling cheat codes as DLC: unlockables and secrets just aren't in games anymore. We have to buy them. As others have said, it's times like this that I'm glad Nintendo's off in their own little world instead of trying to shove this down our throats.

Also, thanks for summing up my thoughts into a nice word. Instead of typing long paragraphs about why I buy company X's games and not company Y's, I can just say "because X's games have some dignity."

Still, knowing that the racing genre is so easily filled with this shit makes me worry about Mario Kart 8...
 

themilo504

New member
May 9, 2010
731
0
0
I don?t mind the concept of having microtransactions in non free to play games as long as the base game doesn?t cost more than 10-20 bucks, and the microtransactions are cheaper than most free to play micro transactions.

but publishers are too stupid and gluttonous to ever do something like that, so what could have been a alternative to free to play is probably going to vanish once consumers stop buying fee to pay games.
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
What is this called? A culling.

You are very right Jim, there are some really bad Fee-to-Pay business practices out there that are jumping on short-term profits without regard for the long term.

These companies will no doubt reach a breaking point and hopefully the better companies will still be around. I bought two Telltale game bundles this weekend. I only recently caught on to these amazing games; and maybe my experience is a sign of things to come for other people and other series.

The only sad thing is that these companies are gonna drag our beloved old franchises through the dirt. I hope we reach appoint where new franchises learn from today and produce games economically.

Ryse is not gonna be one of them, luckily I hear that game sucks anyway.
 

idarkphoenixi

New member
May 2, 2011
1,492
0
0
When "micro-transactions" cost as much, or more than the game itself, can we just stop using the word "micro" at that point?

Honestly, I love that they're doing all of this. Not because it's a good idea, fuck no, but because the greed and the opulence is SO blindingly obvious that people are forced to stop and reconsider their purchase-to-value ratio.

Selling full-priced AAA games, along with the usual DLC/Season Pass bullshit and on top of that adding hundreds of "micro" transactions... Either it's a full priced game or it's free-to-play, pick one. With all the in-game advertising and sponsoring deals Forza went through, it could easily have supported a free-to-play model, which would probably have been better received.
 

PuckFuppet

Entroducing.
Jan 10, 2009
314
0
0
Feel better Jim.

There is a game I play a hell of a lot of, Crusader Kings II, that has more DLC than I care to count (something around 30 different pieces of DLC) and being perfectly honest they could dangle anything infront of me as DLC ("GET A NEW UI!") and I'd probably buy it immediately.

To a point it is because I've spent more time on that game in the last three years than I have on almost every other franchise I've played since I first picked up a sega controller, and I don't mind throwing money at them. To put what I'm trying to say into context, I don't think its unreasonable to allow a end-user the ability to gladly spend more money on a product they enjoy and some games do just that.

While the "Fee-to-Pay" model is frustrating and genuinely fucking retarded, I still remember how much running into that DLC vendor in Dragon Age killed that game for me, I don't agree that companies should just throw out a title and then expect no profits beyond what it made by selling the disc itself.

EDIT: Its worth noting that the company making the game are continuing to support it with new patches that fix bugs and add content for no extra cost if all you bought was the base game, and in a recent case adding support for various Steam features it previously didn't have.
 

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,020
0
0
There is only one game where I can stand microtransactions- Steam
I recently bought feature called Batman:Arkham City, for a few $
And I think it was worth the price
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Havn't we already covered this?
*sees description*
Oooooh, okay Jim, if it makes you feel better.

I have absolutly no interest in the Xbone or PS4. Not only am I as poor as Oscar the Grouch right now, I just couldn't give a crap about any of the launch games, any of the features or just about anything to do with this whole bloody thing. That might change in the future, but I have a 3DS and a WiiU, not to mention I still have a 360 and a PS3 so... i'm fine, i'm good Sony and Microsoft, maybe i'll join in later next year after all of... THIS is over with.

Also, I really hate to imagine a world with no women. Just a hairy, smelly, gross world full of miserable men... why are men so damn ugly compared to women? I know this isn't always the case but... yeah, men suck. Imagine a world with no Tara Strong!?...

We'd still have Tom Hiddleston but he wouldn't last 5 minutes... that tight butt and charming smile... what was I talking about?
 

minimacker

New member
Apr 20, 2010
637
0
0
Jasper van Heycop said:
Tell that to Angry Birds which just shows some very short stupid ads before it starts and is otherwise freely enjoyable.
He did mention Angry Birds and its ridiculous amount of shit to buy.
 

Lono Shrugged

New member
May 7, 2009
1,467
0
0
Going even more into Jim's point. I am personally waiting to see how this console generation develops before (and even if) I buy a console. Forking over 500 bux, for a system, 50-60 bux for a game and then turn it on and being asked for 5 bux for a sword or costume or whatever is frankly insulting. It's like buying a car and the dealer trying to haggle on the branded floor mats. makes you lose confidence in the overall product. I drifted out of consoles maybe 2 years ago to full PC. (I used to buy my more action-y games on console) This development is not at all convincing me to go back. And I doubt I am alone...
 

Morthasa

New member
Jun 22, 2011
18
0
0
Whilst I generally agree on the points made in this video, there is one case I would like to point out one case where microtransactions in a fully priced game served (at least in my opinion) to improve the experience:

In Mass Effect 3's multiplayer, players acquired new characters, weapons and power-ups by purchasing booster packs containing random items of varying rarity. These boosters could either be bought by spending in-game credits (which were gained by successfully completing MP missions) or by directly spending Bioware points (purchased through real-life moolah).

Whilst this did exemplify the traits which Jim described in his previous video on the subject (i.e. testing the players' patience in order to tempt them to take the "quick way" towards getting the goods), it did have a positive consequence: the multiplayer had several DLC expansions which added a great quantity of new content and kept the game alive; all 5 of these expansions were released free of charge.

In conclusion, whilst I do not doubt that the vast majority of non free games with microtransaction elements are plain money grabs, I think that, at least in some cases, the practice can be justified.