one word to summarise this: meh
his points don't seem valid enough, all forms of art have been judged in comparison to the form that came previous, hell that's why something is called an "art" because everything was originally judged in comparison to pretty pictures, its the reason the word "maestro" is synonymous with highly skilled artists and musicians, and the fact we are being compared to an art form is surely a good point? rather than just being labelled kids toys, hell if we care how good our games look we're comparing them to art, and if we care how well the games sound we compare them to music.
aside from that the points he DOES make are nothing major, and they seem to get jumbled a bit, up to a point where i didnt fully understand what the guy was talking about, the video itself is very lackluster, the jokes fall flat, and when your entire arsenal is just pictures of dicks and being condescending thats a difficult feat to pull off.
overall, it just doesn't appeal to me, especially when there is extra credits putting up much more important points in a more entertaining format, and if i want a brit with dick jokes I'll go to yahtzee, who again, more entertaining because he brings up points that are quite valid, and sometimes quite original.
basically what I'm saying is I probably won't be watching this, unless his points get a bit more interesting, and he starts becoming more entertaining than the background music.
also yes, "the steven spielberg of films", well done on the proof-reading.