CoziestPigeon said:ckeymel said:So, you think it's ok for your boss to control everything you do in your life, if you want to keep your job? Ummm, no - your personal time should not be held against you if it is not affecting your work.CoziestPigeon said:It's entirely fair. If they are paying someone to do what they want, you will do exactly what they want, or they will find someone else who will. It is not your right to get a job with them, and if they don't like the fact that you play games like WoW, tough shit. Guess that's not the job for you.
You don't like it, find a new job. He's paying you to do what he wants. You don't do what he wants, you don't get paid. There is no 'right' to be employed.
CoziestPigeon said:ckeymel said:So, you think it's ok for your boss to control everything you do in your life, if you want to keep your job? Ummm, no - your personal time should not be held against you if it is not affecting your work.CoziestPigeon said:It's entirely fair. If they are paying someone to do what they want, you will do exactly what they want, or they will find someone else who will. It is not your right to get a job with them, and if they don't like the fact that you play games like WoW, tough shit. Guess that's not the job for you.
Ummm yeah. He's paying you. This isn't negotiable, he doesn't HAVE to have you working for him under his paycheck. You do what he wants. End of the story.
I'd like to quote a part of the official UK Government Information website, from their article on Job Discrimination Official UK Government Citizens Information Website [http://www.direct.gov.uk]CoziestPigeon said:thebobmaster said:I hope you are never interviewing me for a job. I might not get hired because I like to listen to metal music.CoziestPigeon said:Exactly. Boss owns the efforts he wants to own while you are on the clock. HE HAS NO OBLIGATION TO HIRE YOU, IF FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN HE DOESN'T LIKE YOUR HOBBY. So no, he can't force you to stop playing, but he doesn't have to hire you if you do. Now if you are already working for said boss, then no, he missed his chance, he can't fire you. If he is considering you for a job, and plain old doesn't like you, he does NOT have to hire you. So if you think it's outrageous for a guy to not hire someone because he doesn't like the fact that the potential worker played WoW, you need to straighten your mind.Anton P. Nym said:Um, no. That's not how it works, at least in civilised societies anyway. The boss owns my efforts when I'm on the clock, and I'm responsible for being there on time and in condition to work. Anything else is my business, not the boss's, and if my boss ever tried to tell me how to dress on my days off or what sports to watch at home I'd refuse in writing... and then take 'em to the Labour Board if I was "laid off" afterward.CoziestPigeon said:Ummm yeah. He's paying you. This isn't negotiable, he doesn't HAVE to have you working for him under his paycheck. You do what he wants. End of the story.
I hope you are never applying for a job I'm offering. You might just sit around looking for excuses to not do what I ask all day.
Well, maybe not you. I don't hate metal music.
So, unless playing WoW hampers the worker's ability to perform their job as set out in their job description, there is NO legality to declining that person the job (At least in the UK, however I believe similar laws are widespread in other countries).Direct discrimination
Direct discrimination happens when an employer treats an employee less favourably because of, for example, their gender or race. (So it would be direct discrimination if a driving job was only open to male applicants).
Indirect discrimination
Indirect discrimination is when a condition that disadvantages one group of people more than another is applied to a job. For example, saying that applicants for a job must be clean shaven puts members of some religious groups at a disadvantage.
However the law does allow employers to discriminate indirectly if they can show a good reason for having the condition. For example, the condition that applicants must be clean shaven might be justified if the job involved handling food and it could be shown that having a beard or moustache was a genuine hygiene risk.
If playing WoW adversely affects the worker from doing their job however (e.g. conflicts with working hours, sleep deprivation due to playing etc), then the employer has every right to take action.
Hell, I know someone in upper-management where I work who plays WoW. He knows his limits, works roughly 60 hours a week, and has been one of the best managers in that position in the past 30 years. If it did affect his ability to do his job then he wouldn't have been there, but as he does not let it affect him in the slightest there is NO legal reason as to why he can't have it due to WoW.
Employees are not 'Overlords of all that they survey', and inexcusably unjust demands for workers to change their out-of-hours hobbies when they have no impact on working habits isn't legal in the slightest. So no, it is not a case of "You do what he wants" if what he wants has no relevance to the job at all. If he demands that you stop playing WoW even though your working standards are to a reasonable standard then you can tell your employer to bugger off and call in lawyers if they want it so badly.
EDIT:
Just another good old legality quote to help things settle in:
Federal Laws on Employment Discrimination [http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment-employee-discrimination-harassment/employment-employee-discrimination-harassment-federal-laws.html]
No adverse affect on employee performance = Can't be used as an excuse/reason for not hiring / firing said person.Other federal laws, not enforced by EEOC, also prohibit discrimination and reprisal against federal employees and applicants. The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) contains a number of prohibitions, known as prohibited personnel practices, which are designed to promote overall fairness in federal personnel actions. 5 U.S.C. 2302. The CSRA prohibits any employee who has authority to take certain personnel actions from discriminating for or against employees or applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age or disability. It also provides that certain personnel actions can not be based on attributes or conduct that do not adversely affect employee performance, such as marital status and political affiliation.